How to Measure Propensity to Take Risks in the Italian Context: The Italian Validation of the Risk Propensity Scale

Abstract

Risk propensity is a multifaced construct that influences many aspects of life, such as decision making. In the present study, the psychometric characteristics of the Risk Propensity Scale (RPS) have been explored for the first time in an Italian sample. The RPS is a 7 item self-report questionnaire measuring people’s tendency to take risks. The English RPS has been translated following the forward–backwards translation method, and it was filled out by 199 participants. Since its dimensionality has never been explored before, its factor structure has been analysed with exploratory factor analysis that confirmed the one-factor structure of the questionnaire and the retention of all the items. The Italian version of the RPS has high internal consistency (Cronbach alphas .78), and almost all the items were positively and significantly correlated. The convergent and discriminant validity, analysed by considering the associations with decision-making styles and an implicit measure of risk propensity, were satisfactory. Overall, the Italian version of the RPS is a valid and quick questionnaire useful to measure propensity to take risks in the Italian context.

Keywords

Italian validation risk propensity decision making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernard

Iyare

Moore

(2007). Individual risk propensity and risk background. In 28th Annual Review Seminar Research Department Central Bank of Barbados (Vol. 1).

Brislin

R. W.

(1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Epstein

(1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.49.8.709

Frey

Pedroni

Mata

Rieskamp

Hertwig

(2017). Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Science Advances, 3(10), e1701381. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701381

Gambetti

Fabbri

Bensi

Tonetti

(2008). A contribution to the Italian validation of the general decision-making style inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 842–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.017

Gambetti

Giusberti

(2019). Personality, decision-making styles and investments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80(February), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.002

Gorini

Miglioretti

Pravettoni

(2012). A new perspective on blame culture: An experimental study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(3), 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01831.x

Greenwald

A. G.

(1980). The totalitarian ego fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35(7), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.7.603

10.

Greenwald

A. G.

Farnham

S. D.

(2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022–1038. https://doi.org/10.1037/KK122-3514.79.6.10?2

11.

Guo

Trueblood

J. S.

Diederich

(2017). Thinking fast increases framing effects in risky decision making. Psychological Science, 28(4), 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616689092

12.

Gur

R. C.

Sackeim

(1979). Self-deception: A concept in search of a phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37, 147–169.

13.

Horn

J. L.

(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447

14.

Hutcheson

Sofroniou

(1999). The Multivariate Social Scientist. The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Sage Publications.

15.

Kahneman

(2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697

16.

Kahneman

(2011). Thinking fast, thinking slow. Interpretation. Tavistock.

17.

Keller

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(2017). Mindsets affect risk perception and risk-taking behavior: Illusory optimism and the BART. Social Psychology, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000304

18.

Lejuez

C. W.

Richards

J. B.

Read

J. P.

Kahler

C. W.

Ramsey

S. E.

Stuart

G. L.

Strong

D. R.

Brown

R. A.

(2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75

19.

Loo

(2000). A psychometric evaluation of the general decision-making style inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(5), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00241-X

20.

Marton

Pizzoli

S. F. M.

Vergani

Mazzocco

Monzani

Bailo

Pancani

Pravettoni

(2021). Patients’ health locus of control and preferences about the role that they want to play in the medical decision-making process. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(2), 260-266. DOI:10.1080/13548506.2020.1748211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1748211.

21.

Meertens

R. M.

Lion

(2008). Measuring an individual’s tendency to take risks: The risk propensity scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1506–1520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00357.x

22.

Monzani

Vergani

Pizzoli

S. F. M.

Marton

Mazzocco

Bailo

Messori

Pancani

Cattelan

Pravettoni

(2020). Sexism interacts with patient–physician gender concordance in influencing patient control preferences: Findings from a vignette experimental design. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 12(2):471–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12193

23.

Morton

R. L.

Asher

Peyton

Tran

Smit

A. K.

Butow

P. N.

Kimlin

M. G.

Dobbinson

S. J.

Wordsworth

Keogh

Cust

A. E.

(2019). Risk attitudes and sun protection behaviour: Can behaviour be altered by using a melanoma genomic risk intervention? Cancer Epidemiology, 61, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2019.05.002

24.

Nicholson

O’Creevy

M. F.

Soane

Willman

(2002). Risk propensity and personality. London Business School, Open University Business School and Said Business School Oxford.

25.

Nullaly

J. C.

Bernstein

I. H.

(1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric theory. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1960143

26.

Orne

M. T.

(1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17(11), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043424

27.

Paek

H.-J.

Hove

Paek

H.-J.

Hove

(2017). Risk perceptions and risk characteristics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, June, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.283

28.

Pravettoni

Mazzocco

Gorini

Curigliano

(2016). Understanding cognitive processes behind acceptance or refusal of phase I trials. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 100, 69–73. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.01.023

29.

Robbins

S. P.

(2015). Decide & conquer: The ultimate guide for improving your decision making (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

30.

Rosenberg

M. J.

Rosnow

(1969). The conditions and consequences of evaluation apprehension. In Artifacts in behavioral research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195385540.003.0007

31.

Scott

S. G.

Bruce

R. A.

(1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5):818–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005017

32.

Sitkin

S. B.

Pablo

A. L.

(1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. The Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/258646

33.

Slovic

(2000). The perception of risk. Earthscan Publications.

34.

Steinberg

(2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20445

35.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). https://www.abebooks.com/9780321056771/Using-Multivariate-Statistics-4th-Edition-0321056779/plp

36.

Taylor

S. E.

Brown

J. D.

(1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological bulletin, 103(2), 193-210.

37.

Tedeschi

J. T.

Schlenker

B. R.

Bonoma

T. V.

(1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist, 26(8), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032110

38.

van den Bos

Homberg

de Visser

(2013). A critical review of sex differences in decision-making tasks: focus on the Iowa Gambling Task. Behavioural brain research, 238, 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.002.

39.

Vaughn

M. G.

Salas-Wright

C. P.

Alsolami

A. S.

Goings

T. C.

(2021). Margin for error: Examining racial and ethnic trends in adolescent risk propensity. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 56(6), 993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02026-8.

40.

Yeh

S.-C. J.

Wang

W. C.

Chou

H.-C.

Chen

S.-H. S.

(2021). Private long-term care insurance decision: The role of income, risk propensity, personality, and life experience. Healthcare, 9(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9010102

41.

Zwick

W. R.

Velicer

W. F.

(1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432-442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432.