While voluntary memories are intended and expected, involuntary memories are retrieved with no intention and are usually unexpected (when one is not waiting for a memory). The present study investigates the effects of retrieval intentionality (wanting to retrieve a memory) and monitoring processes (expecting a memory to appear) on the characteristics of autobiographical memories.
Methods
To this end, by applying mixed-method analysis of memory descriptions (i.e. combining qualitative with quantitative analyses) we re-analysed the large pool of involuntary and voluntary memories obtained in one previously published study, asking independent judges to rate all the memories on several dimensions reflecting memory accessibility (i.e. the likelihood that a memory can be retrieved).
Results
When discussing our findings, we speculate that there may be several stages of memory retrieval that might be differently influenced by intention and monitoring.
Conclusions
We discuss the novel hypothesis that there may be two different types of monitoring that operate independently of each other, before and after retrieval, respectively.
AltmanD.G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research (1st ed.). Chapman & Hall.
2.
BarnesA. E.NelsonT. O.DunloskyJ.MazzoniG.NarensL. (1999). An integrative system of metamemory components involved in retrieval. In GopherD.KoriatA. (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 287–313). The MIT Press.
3.
BarzykowskiK.HajdasS.RadelR.NiedźwieńskaA.KvavilashviliL. (2021). The role of inhibitory control and ADHD symptoms in the occurrence of involuntary thoughts about the past and future: An individual differences study. Consciousness and Cognition, 95, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103208.
4.
BarzykowskiK.MazzoniG. (2021). Do intuitive ideas of the qualities that should characterize involuntary and voluntary memories affect their classification?Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01465-3.
5.
BarzykowskiK.NiedźwieńskaA. (2016). The effects of instruction on the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories. Plos One, 11(6), e0157121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157121.
6.
BarzykowskiK.NiedźwieńskaA. (2018a). Involuntary autobiographical memories are relatively more often reported during high cognitive load tasks. Acta Psychologica, 182, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.014.
BarzykowskiK.NiedźwieńskaA.MazzoniG. (2019). How intention to retrieve a memory and expectation that a memory will come to mind influence the retrieval of autobiographical memories. Consciousness and Cognition, 72, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.011.
9.
BarzykowskiK.RadelR.NiedźwieńskaA.KvavilashviliL. (2019). Why are we not flooded by involuntary thoughts about the past and future? Testing the cognitive inhibition dependency hypothesis. Psychological Research, 83(4), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1120-6.
10.
BarzykowskiK.RiessM.HajdasS.NiedźwieńskaA. (2019). School in our memory: do we remember our time in middle and high school differently?Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1621320.
11.
BarzykowskiK.StaugaardS. R. (2016). Does retrieval intentionality really matter? Similarities and differences between involuntary memories and directly and generatively retrieved voluntary memories. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12160.
12.
BarzykowskiK.StaugaardS. R. (2018). How intention and monitoring your thoughts influence characteristics of autobiographical memories. British Journal of Psychology, 109(2), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12259.
13.
BarzykowskiK.StaugaardS. R.MazzoniG. (2021). Retrieval effort or intention: Which is more important for participants’ classification of involuntary and voluntary memories?British Journal of Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12498.
14.
BatoolI.MazzoniG. (2011). Involuntary memories: Are pictorial cues more effective?Poster presented at ICOM.
15.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements: Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x.
16.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal ofthe Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Methodological, 57, 289–300.
BerntsenD. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary access to autobiographical memory. Memory, 6(2), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/741942071.
19.
BerntsenD. (2009). Involuntary autobiographical memories: An introduction to the unbidden past. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575921.
BerntsenD.HallN. M. (2004). The episodic nature of involuntary autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195869.
22.
BerntsenD.RubinD. C. (2004). Cultural life scripts structure recall from autobiographical memory. Memory & Cognition, 32(3), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195836.
23.
BotzungA.DenkovaE.ManningL. (2008). Experiencing past and future personal events: Functional neuroimaging evidence on the neural bases of mental time travel. Brain and Cognition, 66(2), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.07.011.
24.
ColeS. N.StaugaardS. R.BerntsenD. (2016). Inducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0564-9.
25.
ConwayM. A. (1990). Autobiographical memory: An introduction. Open University Press.
ConwayM. A. (2008). Chapter 1.2 Exploring episodic memory. In DereE.EastonA.NadelL.HustonJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral neuroscience. Handbook of episodic memory (pp. 19–29). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-7339(08)00202-6.
ConwayM. A.JobsonL. (2012). On the nature of autobiographical memory. In BerntsenD.RubinD. C. (Eds), Understanding autobiographical memory: Theories and approaches (pp. 54–69). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021937.006.
30.
ConwayM. A.Pleydell-PearceC. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.261.
31.
CoolicanH. (2014). Research methods and statistics in psychology. Psychology Press.
32.
CrovitzH. F.SchiffmanH. (1974). Frequency of episodic memories as a function of their age. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4(5-B), 517–518. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334277.
33.
DewhurstS. A.AndersonR. J.GraceL.BolandJ. (2017). Survival processing versus self-reference: A memory advantage following descriptive self-referential encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.003.
34.
FleissJ. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382.
35.
HintzmanD. L. (2011). Research strategy in the study of memory: Fads, fallacies, and the search for the “coordinates of truth”. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406924.
HutmacherF (2019). Why is there so much more research on vision than on any other sensory modality?Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2246. Article 2246https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02246.
38.
JanssenS. M. J.ChessaA. G.MurreJ. M. J. (2007). Temporal distribution of favourite books, movies, and records: Differential encoding and re-sampling. Memory, 15(7), 755–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701539646.
39.
JanssenS. M. J.MurreJ. M. J.MeeterM. (2008). Reminiscence bump in memory for public events. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 738–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701554409.
40.
JohannessenK. B.BerntsenD. (2010). Current concerns in involuntary and voluntary autobiographical memories. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.01.009.
41.
JoslynS. L.OakesM. a. (2005). Directed forgetting of autobiographical events. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 577–587. doi: 10.3758/BF03195325.
42.
KandelE.R.SchwartzJ.H.JessellT.M. (2000). Principles of neural science. In KandelE. R.ShwartzJ. H.JessellT. M. (Eds.), Constructing the visual image (4th edition, pp. 515–520). McGraw-Hill.
43.
KaplanR.M.SaccussoD. P. (2017). Psychological testing principles, applications, and issues (9th edition). Cengage Learning.
44.
KoriatA. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100(4), 609–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.609.
45.
KoriatA.Levy-SadotR. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.34.
46.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
47.
MaceJ. H. (2006). Episodic remembering creates access to involuntary conscious memory: Demonstrating involuntary recall on a voluntary recall task. Memory, 14(8), 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210600759766.
48.
MaceJHStaleyBJASopociMK (2020). When trying to recall our past, all roads lead to Rome: More evidence for the multi-process retrieval theory of autobiographical memory. Memory & Cognition, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01099-1.
49.
MatsumotoN.MochizukiS. (2019). Retrieval process of overgeneral memory and the capture and executive control hypothesis: Using autobiographical memory test with thought sampling. Memory, 27(5), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1552708.
50.
MatsumotoN.TakahashiY.KawaguchiJ. (2020). Increased direct retrieval of overgeneral categoric memory in individuals with dysphoria and a history of major depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 44(3), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10079-3.
51.
MazzoniG.VannucciM.BatoolI. (2014). Manipulating cues in involuntary autobiographical memory: Verbal cues are more effective than pictorial cues. Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1076–1085. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0420-3.
52.
McHughM. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.
53.
RitchieT. D.SkowronskiJ. J.Richard WalkerW.WoodS. E. (2006). Comparing two perceived characteristics of autobiographical memory: Memory detail and accessibility. Memory, 14(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210500478434.
54.
RubinD. C.DennisM. F.BeckhamJ. C. (2011). Autobiographical memory for stressful events: The role of autobiographical memory in posttraumatic stress disorder. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 840–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.015.
55.
SchlagmanS.KliegelM.SchulzJ.KvavilashviliL. (2009). Differential effects of age on involuntary and voluntary autobiographical memory. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015785.
56.
SchlagmanS.KvavilashviliL. (2008). Involuntary autobiographical memories in and outside the laboratory: How different are they from voluntary autobiographical memories?Memory & Cognition, 36(5), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.920.
57.
SchwartzB. L.MetcalfeJ. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1074.
58.
ŚmiejaM.OrzechowskiJ.BeauvaleA. (2007). TIE—test inteligencji emocjonalnej. [TIE—Test of Emotional Intelligence]. Studia Psychologiczne, 45(1), 19–32.
59.
ToyotaH. (2012). The effects of social memories in autobiographical elaboration on incidental memory. Japanese Psychological Research, 54(4), 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00519.x.
60.
UzerT. (2016). Retrieving autobiographical memories: How different retrieval strategies associated with different cues explain reaction time differences. Acta Psychologica, 164, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.004.
UzerT.LeeP. J.BrownN. R. (2012). On the prevalence of directly retrieved autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1296–1308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028142.
63.
VannucciM.BatoolI.PelagattiC.MazzoniG. (2014). Modifying the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories. Plos One, 9(4), e89582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089582.
64.
VannucciM.PelagattiC.HanczakowskiM.ChiorriC. (2019). Visual attentional load affects the frequency of involuntary auto- biographical memories and their level of meta-awareness. Mem- ory & Cognition, 47, 1171–129018. https://doi.org/10.3758/s1342--0854-0.
65.
WangQ. (2004). The emergence of cultural self-constructs: autobiographical memory and self-description in European American and Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 40(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.3.
66.
WangQ. (2008). Being American, being Asian: The bicultural self and autobiographical memory in Asian Americans. Cognition, 107, 743–751.
67.
WangQ.ConwayM. A. (2004). The Stories We Keep: Autobiographical Memory in American and Chinese Middle-Aged Adults. Journal of Personality, 72(5), 911–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00285.x.
68.
WilliamsJ. M. G. (1996). Depression and the specificity of autobiographical memory. In RubinD. C. (Ed.), Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory (pp. 244–268). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527913.010.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
