Release or Denial: Evaluating the Roles of Emotion and Risk in Parole Decisions

Abstract

Parole boards often incorporate numerous factors when making release decisions. These factors are typically related to the inmates’ case files. However, in some instances, parole boards’ decisions are influenced by factors outside of the case files, sometimes referred to as extra-legal factors. According to the emotion as social information model, emotion can communicate specific messages to others, and in this case, parole board members might unknowingly incorporate their own emotions and inmates’ emotional displays into their decisions. The current study examines the role of parole board member and inmate emotional expressions as predictors of parole release decisions. Parole hearings were coded for emotion, parole board and inmate gender, supporter presence, and risk scores. Overall, risk scores and parole board members’ emotions predicted release decisions. Higher risk scores were associated with a lower likelihood of release, and inmates’ negative emotion was related to a lower likelihood of release. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

Parole gender emotion corrections decision-making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadinsky

(2012). Probation and parole: Theory and practice (11th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Applegate

B. K.

Cullen

F. T.

Fisher

B. S.

(2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap? Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00127-1

Austin

Naro

(2017). Revalidation of the Nevada Parole Board risk assessment instrument. The JFA Institute. parole.nv.gov

Aviezer

Hassin

R. R.

Ryan

Grady

Susskind

Anderson

Moscovitch

Bentin

(2008). Angry, disgusted, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychological Science, 19(7), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02148.x

Bandes

S. A.

(2016). Remorse and criminal justice. Emotion Review, 8(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915601222

Barrett

L. F.

(2011). Was Darwin wrong about emotional expressions? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429125

Barrett

L. F.

Mesquita

Gendron

(2011). Context in emotion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422522

Brody

L. R.

Hall

J. A.

, (2008). Gender and emotion in context. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 395–408). Guilford.

Burns

Kinkade

Leone

M. C.

Philips

(1999). Perspectives on parole: The board members’ viewpoint. Federal Probation, 63, 16–22.

10.

Caplan

J. M.

(2007). What factors affect parole: A review of empirical research. Federal Probation, 71(1), 16–19.

11.

Caplan

J. M.

(2010). Parole release decisions: Impact of victim input on a representative sample of inmates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.02.012

12.

Carll

(2017). Disparate vantage points: Race, gender, county context, and attitudes about harsh punishments in the US. Social Science Research, 64, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.10.008

13.

Carroll

J. S.

Wiener

R. L.

Coates

Galegher

Alibrio

J. J.

(1982). Evaluation, diagnosis, and prediction in parole decision making. Law & Society Review, 17(1), 199–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053536

14.

Carver

C. S.

Harmon-Jones

(2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965

15.

Dodd

(2018). The punitive woman? Gender differences in public attitudes toward parole among an Australian sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(10), 3006–3022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17739560

16.

Dodd

(2020). Angry women and empathic men: How individuals. Do gender. In a criminal justice context through conformity or resistance to gendered feeling rules. The Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice and Criminology, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.c32f0300

17.

Ekman

Friesen

W. V.

(1986). A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 10(2), 159–168. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992253

18.

Fischer

A. H.

Manstead

A. S. R.

(2008). Social functions of emotion. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotion. (3rd ed., pp. 456–468). Guilford.

19.

Forgas

J. P.

(2010). Affect in legal and forensic settings: The cognitive benefits of not being too happy. In B. H. Bornstein & R. L. Wiener (Eds.), Emotion and the law: Psychological perspectives (pp. 13–44). Springer.

20.

Friedman

Anderson

Brett

Olekalns

Goates

Lisco

C. C.

(2004). The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: Evidence from electronically mediated disputes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.369

21.

Frijda

N. H.

Mesquita

(1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In S. Kitayama & H. S. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 51–87). American Psychological Association.

22.

Garber

R. M.

Maslach

(1977). The parole hearing: Decision or justification? Law and Human Behavior, 1(3), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066627

23.

Gobeil

Serin

R. C.

(2010). Parole decision making. In J. M. Brown & E. A. Campbell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 251–258). Cambridge University Press.

24.

Gold

G. J.

Weiner

(2000). Remorse, confession, group identity, and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2204_3

25.

Haghighi

Lopez

(1998). Gender and perception of prisons and prisoners. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(6), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00023-3

26.

Heuer

Lange

W. G.

Isaac

Rinck

Becker

E. S.

(2010). Morphed emotional faces: Emotion detection and misinterpretation in social anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41(4), 418–425.

27.

Jack

R. E.

Blais

Scheepers

Schyns

P. G.

Caldara

(2009). Cultural confusions show that facial expressions are not universal. Current Biology, 19(18), 1543–1548.

28.

Keltner

Haidt

(1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 505–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.051

29.

Kramer

M. W.

Hess

J. A.

(2002). Communication rules for the display of emotions in organizational settings. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902161003

30.

Kutateladze

Crossman

A. M.

(2009). An exploratory analysis of gender differences in punitiveness in two countries. International Criminal Justice Review, 19(3), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567709338921

31.

Lacombe

(2013). “Mr. S, you do have sexual fantasies?” the parole hearing and treatment of a sex offender at the turn of the 21^st century. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 38(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs14844

32.

LaFrance

Banaji

(1992). Toward a reconsideration of the gender-emotion relationship. Emotion and Social Behavior, 14, 178–201.

33.

Lanzetta

J. T.

Englis

B. G.

(1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers' vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.543

34.

Marques

J. M.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

Leyens

J. P.

(1988). The ‘black sheep effect’: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102

35.

Martens

J. P.

Tracy

J. L.

Shariff

A. F.

(2012). Status signals: Adaptive benefits of displaying and observing the nonverbal expressions of pride and shame. Cognition & Emotion, 26(3), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.645281

36.

Maruschak

L. M.

Bonczar

T. P.

(2013). Probation and parole in the United States, 2012 (no. NCJ 243826). Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.

37.

Matejkowski

Draine

Solomon

Salzer

M. S.

(2011). Mental illness, criminal risk factors and parole release decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29(4), 528–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.991

38.

Mooney

J. L.

Daffern

(2014). Elucidating the factors that influence parole decision-making and violent offenders’ performance on parole. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(3), 385–405. http://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2013.818521

39.

Morgan

K. D.

Smith

(2005). Parole release decisions revisited: An analysis of parole release decisions for violent inmates in a southeastern state. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.02.007

40.

Nevada Board of Parole Commissions. (2011, June). Operation of the board. http://parole.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/parolenvgov/content/Hearings/OperationOfTheBoard.PDF

41.

Nunez

Estrada-Reynolds

Schweitzer

Myers

(2016). The impact of emotions on juror judgments and decision making. In M. K. Miller & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 55–93). Springer.

42.

Parkinson

(2005). Do facial movements express emotions or communicate motives? Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 9(4), 278–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0904_1

43.

Parkinson

(2014). Emotions in interpersonal life: Computer mediation, modeling, and simulation. In R. Calvo, S. D’Mello, J. Gratch, & A. Kappas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of affective computing (pp. 68–83). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199942237.013.004

44.

Proeve

M. J.

Howells

(2006). Effects of remorse and shame and criminal justice experience on judgements about a sex offender. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160512331316271

45.

Reamer

F. G.

(2017). On the parole board: Reflections on crime, punishment, redemption, and justice. Columbia University Press.

46.

Russell-Brown

(2018). The academic swoon over implicit racial bias: Costs, benefits and other considerations. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 15(1), 185–193. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X18000073

47.

Ruva

C. L.

Guenther

C. C.

Yarbrough

(2011). Positive and negative pretrial publicity: The roles of impression formation, emotion, and predecisional distortion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(5), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811400823

48.

Semmler

Brewer

(2002). Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.502

49.

Serin

R. C.

Gobeil

Lloyd

C. D.

Chadwick

Wardrop

Hanby

(2016). Using dynamic risk to enhance conditional release decisions in prisoners to improve their outcomes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(2-3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2213

50.

Shammas

V. L.

(2019). The perils of parole hearings: California lifers, performative disadvantage, and the ideology of insight. Polar: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 42(1), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12275

51.

Slovic

Peters

(2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x

52.

Sprott

J. B.

(1999). Are members of the public tough on crime? The dimensions of public “punitiveness”. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(5), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(99)00017-3

53.

Szumilas

(2010). Explaining odds ratios. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(3), 227–229.

54.

Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. (2013, December). Revised parole guidelines. http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/bpp/parole_guidelines/parole_guidelines.html

55.

Van Kleef

G. A.

(2010). The emerging view of emotion as social information. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00262.x

56.

Van Kleef

G. A.

Anastasopoulou

Nijstad

B. A.

(2010). Can expressions of anger enhance creativity? A test of the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.015

57.

Van Kleef

G. A.

De Dreu

C. K.

Manstead

A. S.

(2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 45–96). Academic Press.

58.

Van Kleef

G. A.

Van Doorn

E. A.

Heerdink

M. W.

Koning

L. F.

(2011). Emotion is for influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 114–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2011.627192

59.

Vîlcică

E. R.

(2018). Revisiting parole decision making: Testing for the punitive hypothesis in a large US jurisdiction. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(5), 1357–1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16668512

60.

Waldron

V. R.

Krone

K. J.

(1991). The experience and expression of emotion in the workplace: A study of a corrections organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318991004003002

61.

West-Smith

Pogrebin

M. R.

Poole

E. D.

(2000). Denial of parole: An inmate perspective. Federal Probation, 64(2), 3–10.

62.

Williams

(1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 963–976. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.963

63.

Zhong, R., Baranoski, M., Feigenson, N., Davidson, L., Buchanan, A., & Zonana, H. (2014). So you're sorry? The role of remorse in criminal law. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 42, 39–48.