The purpose of this investigation was to examine the factorial validity and measurement invariance of the short version of the Leadership Scale for Sports (LSS; Chelladurai & Saleh, 1980): coaches’ perceptions of their own behavior, athletes’ preferences and athletes’ perceptions of their coaches’ behavior. This validation will allow researchers to minimize time demands on participants. Three independent samples of athletes (n1 = 373; n2 = 817; n3 = 246) and two samples of coaches (n1 = 115; n2 = 351) were studied to examine the factorial validity and measurement invariance of the 25-item version of the LSS (LSS-25; Chiu et al., 2016). Findings indicated that a 15-item version (LSS-15) fits the data better than the LSS-25. The LSS-15 showed factorial validity and proved to have adequate reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis showed that its factor structure was invariant across two independent samples and across gender for athletes’ perceived and preferred versions. Significant relationships between the LSS-15 subscales and athlete satisfaction also demonstrate criterion validity. These findings support a valid and reliable alternative to the original LSS long-form, especially in applied settings when time constraints require a brief measure of leadership or when study designs include multiple variables.
AndrewD. P. S. (2009).
The impact of leadership behavior on satisfaction of college tennis players: A test of the leadership behaviour congruency hypothesis of the multidimensional model of leadership. Journal of Sport Behavior,
32, 261–277.
2.
Borrego, C. C., Leitão, J. C., Alves, J., Silva, C., & Palmi, J. (2010). Análise confirmatória do Questionário de Satisfação do Atleta – Versão Portuguesa [Confirmatory factor analysis of the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ) – Portuguese version]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 23(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722010000100014.
3.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.).
Routledge.
4.
ChelladuraiP. (1993). Leadership. In SingerR.TennantL. (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp. 647–671).
Macmillan.
5.
ChelladuraiP. (2007). Leadership in sports. In TenenbaumG.EklundR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 113–135).
John Wiley & Sons.
6.
ChelladuraiP.CarronA. V. (1983).
Athletic maturity and preferred leadership. Journal of Sport Psychology,
5(4), 371–380.
7.
ChelladuraiP.RiemerH. A. (1998). Measurement of leadership in sport. In DudaJ. L. (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 227–256).
Fitness Information Technology.
8.
ChelladuraiP.SalehS. D. (1980).
Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology,
2(1), 34–45.
9.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002).
Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
9(2), 233–255.
10.
ChiuW.RodriguezF. M.WonD. (2016).
Revisiting the leadership scale for sports: Examining factor structure through exploratory structural equation modelling. Psychological Reports,
119(2), 435–449.
11.
FletcherR. B.RobertsM. H. (2013).
Longitudinal stability of the leadership scale for sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,
17(2), 89–104.
12.
GrahamJ. W.HoferS. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In LittleT. D.SchnableK. U.BaumertJ. (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201–218).
Erlbaum.
13.
HairJ. F.Jr.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.).
Pearson.
14.
KwonH. H.KohK. T.PyunD. Y.WangJ. (2009).
Psychometric properties of leadership scale for sport: The case of Singaporean secondary school athletes. International Journal of Sport Management,
10, 367–381.
15.
KwonH. H.PyunD. Y.HanS.OgasawaraE. (2011).
Testing for factorial invariance of the modified leadership scale for sports: Using a Japanese version. Asia Pacific Journal of Education,
31(1), 65–76.
16.
MárcenC.GimenoF.GómezC. (2016).
Adapting leadership scale for sport (LSS) in a high-performance center coaches and athletes. Cuadernos de Psicología Del Deporte,
16, 21–32.
17.
MarshH. W.EllisL. A.ParadaR. H.RichardsG.HeubeckB. G. (2005).
A short version of the self-description questionnaire II: Operationalizing criteria for short-form evaluation with new applications of confirmatory factor analyses. Psychological Assessment,
17(1), 81–102.
18.
MartinS. B.JacksonA. W.RichardsonP. A.WeillerK. H. (1999).
Coaching preferences of adolescent youths and their parents. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,
11(2), 247–262.
19.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. J. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.).
McGraw-Hill.
20.
PodsakoffP.MacKenzieS.LeeJ.PodsakoffN. (2003).
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology,
88(5), 879–903.
21.
RaykovT. (1997).
Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement,
21(2), 173–184.
22.
Riemer, H. A., & Toon, K. (2001). Leadership and satisfaction in tennis: Examination of congruence, gender, and ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72(3), 243–256. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2001.10608957.
23.
RiemerH. A. (2007). Multidimensional model of coach leadership. In JowettS.LavalleeD. (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 57–74).
Human Kinetics.
24.
RiemerH. A.ChelladuraiP. (1995).
Leadership and satisfaction in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
17(3), 276–293.
25.
Riemer, H. A., & Chelladurai, P. (1998). Development of the Atlhete Satisfaction Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(2), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.20.2.127.
26.
ScottJ. (2008). Children as respondents: The challenge for quantitative methods. In ChristensenP.JamesA. (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 87–108).
Routledge.
27.
SerpaS. (1993).
Avaliação dos processos de interacção treinador-atleta e liderança no desporto [Evaluation of the processes of coach-athlete interaction and leadership in sport]. Ludens,
13, 9–16.
28.
SerpaS.PatacoV.SantosF. (1991).
Leadership patterns in handball international competition. International Journal of Sport Psychology,
22, 78–89.
29.
SmithG. T.McCarthyD. M.AndersonK. G. (2000).
On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment,
12(1), 102–111.
30.
WilliamsL. J.CoteJ. A.BuckleyM. R. (1989).
Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions of work: Reality or artifact?Journal of Applied Psychology,
74(3), 462–468.
31.
YungY.-F.BentlerP. M. (1996). Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance structures. In MarcoulidesG. A.SchumackerR. E. (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 195–226).
Erlbaum.
