The Forensic Symptoms Inventory—Youth Version—Revised: Development and Age Invariance Testing of a Broad-Spectrum Questionnaire for Forensic Assessment
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online October, 2021
The Forensic Symptoms Inventory—Youth Version—Revised: Development and Age Invariance Testing of a Broad-Spectrum Questionnaire for Forensic Assessment
Covering both individual and neuropsychological factors, the Forensic Symptom Inventory—Youth Version—Revised (FSI-YV-R) is the first broad spectrum questionnaire for adolescents in forensic care, measuring several deficits, such as executive dysfunctions, anger, and inadequate coping to enhance treatment goals and evaluate interventions. In this study, both the factor structure and the measurement and structural invariance of the FSI-YV-R were investigated. The sample consisted of 159 forensic juvenile outpatients (79.9% males and 20.1% females) aged 12 to 19 with a mean age of 16.07 (SD = 1.57). Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analyses identified a second-order model (measuring executive functioning) and proved measurement and structural invariant across age groups (younger adolescents, 12–15 years and older adolescents, 16–18 years). Contrary to the expectations none of the FSI-YV-R subscales differentiated between younger adolescents (N = 74) and older adolescents (N = 85). These results and implications for both theory and practice are discussed.
AdamsonsK.BuehlerC. (2007).
Mothering versus fathering versus parenting: Measurement equivalence in parenting measures. Parenting,
7(3), 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295190701498686
2.
AdjorloloS. (2017).
Biological protective factors of criminal offending: Implications for risk assessment research and practice. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology,
28(1), 108–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2016.1261175
3.
AebiM.GigerJ.PlattnerB.MetzkeC. W.SteinhausenH. C. (2014).
Problem coping skills, psychosocial adversities and mental health problems in children and adolescents as predictors of criminal outcomes in young adulthood. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,
23(5), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-013-0458-y
4.
AgnewR. (2001).
Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,
38(4), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427801038004001
5.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
6.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.).
LexisNexis/Matthew Bender.
AssinkM.van der PutC. E.HoeveM.de VriesS. L.StamsG. J. J.OortF. J. (2015).
Risk factors for persistent delinquent behavior among juveniles: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review,
42, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.002
9.
BaumgartnerH.SteenkampJ. B. E. (1998).
Multi-group latent variable models for varying numbers of items and factors with cross-national and longitudinal applications. Marketing Letters,
9(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007911903032
10.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM. B. (2000).
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine,
25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
BiedermanJ.PettyC. R.FriedR.DoyleA. E.SpencerT.SeidmanL. J.GrossL.PoetzlK.FaraoneS. V. (2007).
Stability of executive function deficits into young adult years: A prospective longitudinal follow‐up study of grown up males with ADHD. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica,
116(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01008.x
13.
BijleveldC. C.van der GeestV.HendriksJ. (2016). Vulnerable youth in pathways to adulthood. In: LoeberR.HoeveM.Wim SlotN.Van der LaanP.H. (Eds.), Persisters and desisters in crime from adolescence into adulthood (pp. 145–166).
Routledge.
14.
BoelemaS. R.HarakehZ.OrmelJ.HartmanC. A.VolleberghW. A.van ZandvoortM. J. (2014).
Executive functioning shows differential maturation from early to late adolescence: Longitudinal findings from a TRAILS study. Neuropsychology,
28(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000049
15.
BoisvertD. L.ConnollyE. J.VaskeJ. C.ArmstrongT. A.BoutwellB. B. (2019).
Genetic and environmental overlap between substance use and delinquency in adolescence: An analysis by same-sex twins. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,
17(2), 154–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204018756469
16.
BontaJ. L.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.).
Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
17.
BorraniJ.FríasM.OrtizX.GarcíaA.ValdezP. (2015).
Analysis of cognitive inhibition and flexibility in juvenile delinquents. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology,
26(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.971852
18.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research.
The Guildford Press.
19.
Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage
20.
CauffmanE.SteinbergL.PiqueroA. R. (2005).
Psychological, neuropsychological and physiological correlates of serous antisocial behavior in adolescence: The role of self-control. Criminology,
43(1), 133–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00005.x
21.
CheungG. W.LauR. S. (2008).
Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods,
11(2), 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343
22.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002).
Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343
23.
ChoS.LeeY. H. (2020).
Assessing self-control and strain of delinquent peer association trajectories within developmental perspectives: A latent class growth analysis approach. Children and Youth Services Review,
109, 104745–15. DOI:1016/j.childyouth.2020.104745.
24.
CornellD. G.PetersonC. S.RichardsH. A. (1999).
Anger as a predictor of aggression among incarcerated adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
67(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.67.1.108
25.
CottrellC. (2018).
Racial differences in anger and depression as mediators in the relationship between suspension and juvenile delinquency: A test of general strain theory. Journal for the Advancement of Educational Research International,
12(1), 58–69.
CroneE. A. (2019). Hersenontwikkeling in de adolescentie [Brain development in adolescence]. In: SlotW.Van AkenM. (Eds.), Psychologie van de adolescentie (pp. 79–91).
Thieme Meulenhoff.
28.
DowdenC.BrownS. L. (2002).
The role of substance abuse factors in predicting recidivism: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law,
8(3), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160208401818
29.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999).
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods,
4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.4.3.272
30.
FournetN.RoulinJ.MonnierC.AtzeniT.CosnefroyO.Le GallD.RoyA. (2015).
Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and structural invariance with age of the behavior rating inventory of executive function (BRIEF)—French version. Child Neuropsychology: A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence,
21(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2014.906569
31.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA.AltamiranoL. J.CorleyR. P.YoungS. E.RheaS. A.HewittJ. K. (2016).
Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study. Developmental Psychology,
52(2), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000075
32.
GardnerT. W.DishionT. J.ConnellA. M. (2008).
Adolescent self-regulation as resilience: Resistance to antisocial behavior within the deviant peer context. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,
36(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9176-6
GiancolaP. R.RothR. M.ParrottD. J. (2006).
The mediating role of executive functioning in the relation between difficult temperament and physical aggression. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment,
28(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-9015-4
35.
GieddJ. N. (2004).
Adolescent brain development: Vulnerabilities and opportunities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
1021, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1308.009
36.
GioiaG.IsquithP.GuyS.KenworthyL. (2000). Behavior rating inventory of executive function.
Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
37.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime.
Stanford University Press.
38.
HarveyM.ByrdM. (1998).
The relationship between perceptions of self-esteem, patterns of familial attachment, and family environment during early and late phases of adolescence. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth,
7(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.1998.9747815
39.
HerreroO.EscorialS.ColomR. (2010).
Basic executive processes in incarcerated offenders. Personality and Individual Differences,
48(2), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.09.009
40.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008).
Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,
6(1), 53–60. http://arrow.dit.ie
41.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99).
SAGE Publications, Inc.
42.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999).
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
43.
HuizingaM.SmidtsD. P. (2011).
Age-related changes in executive function: A normative study with the Dutch version of the behavior rating inventory of executive function (BRIEF). Child Neuropsychology: A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence,
17(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2010.509715
JacobsonK. C.PrescottC. A.KendlerK. S. (2002).
Sex differences in the genetic and environmental influences on the development of antisocial behavior. Development and Psychopathology,
14(2), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579402002110
46.
KennyD. T.BlackerS.AllertonM. (2014).
Reculer pour Mieux Sauter: A review of attachment and other developmental processes inherent in identified risk factors for juvenile delinquency and juvenile offending. Laws,
3(3), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3030439
47.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.).
Guilford Press.
48.
KronerD. G.LozaW. (2001).
Evidence for the efficacy of self-report in predicting nonviolent and violent criminal recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,
16(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016002005
49.
LeversoJ.BielbyW.HoelterL. F. (2015).
Back on the streets: Maturation and risk factors for recidivism among serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Adolescence,
41, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.02.008
50.
LongE. C.HillJ.LunaB.VerhulstB.ClarkD. B. (2015).
Disruptive behavior disorders and indicators of disinhibition in adolescents: The BRIEF-SR, anti-saccade task, and D-KEFS color–word interference test. Journal of Adolescence,
44, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.07.003
MalagoliC.UsaiM. C. (2018).
The effects of gender and age on inhibition and working memory organization in 14- to 19-year old adolescents and young adults. Cognitive Development,
45, 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.005
53.
MarshH. W.WenZ.HauK. T. (2004).
Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods,
9(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.9.3.275
54.
MatthysW.VanderschurenL. J.SchutterD. J. (2013).
The neurobiology of oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: Altered functioning in three mental domains. Development and Psychopathology,
25(1), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579412000272
55.
MillerH. V. (2010).
If your friends jumped off of a bridge, would you do it too? Delinquent peers and susceptibility to peer influence. Justice Quarterly,
27(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903218974
56.
MillsJ. F.LozaW.KronerD. G. (2003).
Predictive validity despite social desirability: Evidence for the robustness of self‐report among offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health,
13(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.536
57.
MiuraH.FuchigamiY. (2017).
Impaired executive function in 14‐to 16‐year‐old boys with conduct disorder is related to recidivism: A prospective longitudinal study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health,
27(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1993
58.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000).
The Unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology,
41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
59.
MoffittT. E. (1993).
Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review,
100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.100.4.674
60.
MoffittT. E.ArseneaultL.BelskyD.DicksonN.HancoxR. J.HarringtonH.HoutsR.PoultonR.RobertsB. W.RossS.SearsM. R.ThomsonW. M.CaspiA. (2011).
A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
108(7), 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108
61.
MoilanenK. (2007).
The adolescent self-regulatory inventory: The development and validation of a questionnaire of short-term and long-term self-regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
36(6), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9107-9
62.
MulderE.BrandE.BullensR.Van MarleH. (2011).
Risk factors for overall recidivism and severity of recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,
55(1), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x09356683
63.
NordvallO.JonssonB.NeelyA. S. (2017).
Self-reported and performance-based measures of executive functions in interned youth. Psychology, Crime & Law,
23(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2016.1239725
64.
OgilvieJ. M.StewartA. L.ChanR. C.ShumD. H. (2011).
Neuropsychological measures of executive function and antisocial behavior: A meta‐analysis. Criminology,
49(4), 1063–1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00252.x
65.
OhannessianC. M.VannucciA.LincolnC. R.FlanneryK. M.TrinhA. (2019).
Self‐competence and depressive symptoms in middle–late adolescence: Disentangling the direction of effect. Journal of Research on Adolescence: The Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence,
29(3), 736–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12412
66.
PetrichD. M.SullivanC. J. (2020).
Does future orientation moderate the relationship between impulse control and offending? Insights from a sample of serious young offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,
18(2), 156–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204019876976
67.
PharoH.SimC.GrahamM.GrossJ.HayneH. (2011).
Risky business: Executive function, personality, and reckless behavior during adolescence and emerging adulthood. Behavioral Neuroscience,
125(6), 970–978. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025768
68.
RatchfordM.BeaverK. M. (2009).
Neuropsychological deficits, low self-control, and delinquent involvement: Toward a biosocial explanation of delinquency. Criminal Justice and Behavior,
36(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808325967
69.
RaubenheimerJ. (2004).
An item selection procedure to maximize scale reliability and validity. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology,
30(4), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v30i4.168
70.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006).
Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin,
132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
71.
RoccaG.VerdeA.GattiU. (2019).
Impact of alcohol and cannabis use on juvenile delinquency: Results from an international multi-city study (ISRD3). European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research,
25(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09413-7
72.
SagoneE.De CaroliM. E.FalangaR.IndianaM. L. (2020).
Resilience and perceived self-efficacy in life skills from early to late adolescence. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth,
25(1), 882–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2020.1771599
73.
SawyerS. M.AzzopardiP. S.WickremarathneD.PattonG. C. (2018).
The age of adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health,
2(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1
74.
SchiebenerJ.García-AriasM.García-VillamisarD.Cabanyes-TruffinoJ.BrandM. (2015).
Developmental changes in decision making under risk: The role of executive functions and reasoning abilities in 8- to 19-year-old decision makers. Child Neuropsychology: A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence,
21(6), 759–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2014.934216
75.
SéguinJ. R.BoulericeB.HardenP. W.TremblayR. E.PihlR. O. (1999).
Executive functions and physical aggression after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, general memory, and IQ. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
40(8), 1197–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00536
76.
SigfusdottirI. D.GudjonssonG. H.SigurdssonJ. F. (2010).
Bullying and delinquency. The mediating role of anger. Personality and Individual Differences,
48(4), 391–396.
77.
SlotW.Van AkenM. (Eds.). (2019). Psychologie van de adolescentie [Psychology of adolescence].
ThiemeMeulenhoff.
78.
SowellE. R.ThompsonP. M.HolmesC. J.BatthR.JerniganT. L.TogaA. W. (1999).
Localizing age-related changes in brain structure between childhood and adolescence using statistical parametric mapping. NeuroImage,
9(6), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0436
79.
SpielbergJ. M.GalarceE. M.LadouceurC. D.McMakinD. L.OlinoT. M.ForbesE. E.SilkJ. S.RyanN. D.DahlR. E. (2015).
Adolescent development of inhibition as a function of SES and gender: Converging evidence from behavior and fMRI. Human Brain Mapping,
36(8), 3194–3203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22838
80.
SpinellaM. (2007).
Normative data and a short form of the Barratt impulsivity scale. The International Journal of Neuroscience,
117(3), 359–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450600588881
81.
SpruitA.van der PutC.GubbelsJ.BindelsA. (2017).
Age differences in the severity, impact and relative importance of dynamic risk factors for recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice,
50, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.006
82.
StadlerC.PoustkaF.SterzerP. (2010).
The heterogeneity of disruptive behavior disorders–implications for neurobiological research and treatment. Frontiers in Psychiatry,
1, 21–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2010.00021
83.
SteketeeM.JungerM.Junger-TasJ. (2013).
Sex differences in the predictors of juvenile delinquency: Females are more susceptible to poor environments; males are influenced more by low self-control. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice,
29(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986212470888
84.
SyngelakiE. M.MooreS. C.SavageJ. C.FairchildG.Van GoozenS. H. M. (2009).
Executive functioning and risky decision making in young male offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior,
36(11), 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809343095
85.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon
86.
TaylorS. J.BarkerL. A.HeaveyL.McHaleS. (2013).
The typical developmental trajectory of social and executive functions in late adolescence and early adulthood. Developmental Psychology,
49(7), 1253–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029871
87.
TewJ.HarkinsL.DixonL. (2015).
Assessing the reliability and validity of the self-report psychopathy scales in a UK offender population. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology,
26(2), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.981565
88.
TillmanC.BrockiK. C.SørensenL.LundervoldA. J. (2015).
A longitudinal examination of the developmental executive function hierarchy in children with externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Attention Disorders,
19(6), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713488439
89.
TonnaerF.CimaM.ArntzA. (2016).
Executive (dys)functioning and impulsivity as possible vulnerability factors for aggression in forensic patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,
204(4), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000485
90.
ToplakM. E.BucciarelliS. M.JainU.TannockR. (2009).
Executive functions: Performance-based measures and the behavior rating inventory of executive function (BRIEF) in adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Child Neuropsychology: A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence,
15(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802070929
91.
ToplakM. E.WestR. F.StanovichK. E. (2013).
Practitioner review: Do performance‐based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
54(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12001
92.
TreffersP. D. A.GoedhartA. W.VeermanJ. W.Van den BerghB. R. H.AckaertL.De RyckeL. (2002). Competentiebelevingsschaal voor adolescenten (CBSA): Handleiding [Competency perception scale for adolescents (CBSA): Manual].
Harcourt Test Publishers.
93.
ValliantP. M.FreestonA.PottierD.KosmynaR. (2003).
Personality and executive functioning as risk factors in recidivists. Psychological Reports,
92(1), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.1.299
94.
Van der GeestV. (2011). Working their way into adulthood: Delinquency and employment in high risk boys to age 32.
Viktor van der Geest. http://www.vu.nl
95.
Van der PutC. E.StamsG. J. J.HoeveM.DekovicM.SpanjaardH. J. M.Van der LaanP. H.BarnoskiR. P. (2012).
Changes in the relative importance of dynamic risk factors for recidivism during adolescence. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,
56(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x11398462
96.
Van der VenS. H. G.KroesbergenE. H.BoomJ.LesemanP. P. M. (2013).
The structure of executive functions in children: A closer examination of inhibition, shifting, and updating. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology,
31(Pt 1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835x.2012.02079.x
97.
van HornJ. E. (2018).
The forensic symptoms inventory—Revised (FSI-R adults): Measurement and structural invariance across gender and age groups. Psychological Reports,
121(3), 566–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117732343
98.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000).
A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods,
3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
99.
VedelagoL.AmlungM.MorrisV.PetkerT.BalodisI.McLachlanK.MamakM.MouldenH.ChaimowitzG.MacKillopJ. (2019).
Technological advances in the assessment of impulse control in offenders: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law,
37(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2420
100.
VelottiP.GarofaloC.CalleaA.BucksR. S.RobertonT.DaffernM. (2017).
Exploring anger among offenders: The role of emotion dysregulation and alexithymia. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,
24(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1164639
101.
VerhulstF. C.EndeJ. V. D.KootH. M. (1997). Handleiding voor de youth self-report (YSR) [Manual for the youth self-report (YSR)].
Sophia Kinderziekenhuis, Erasmus MC.
102.
WaltersG. D. (2006).
Risk-appraisal versus self-report in the prediction of criminal justice outcomes: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior,
33(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0093854805284409
103.
WaltersG. D. (2015).
Early childhood temperament, maternal monitoring, reactive criminal thinking, and the origin(s) of low self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice,
43(5), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.07.001
104.
WaltersG. D. (2019).
Maturing out of delinquency: Unpacking the effects of identity achievement and future orientation on crime desistance. Self and Identity,
18(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2018.1439848
105.
WaltersG. D. (2020).
Prosocial peers as risk, protective, and promotive factors for the prevention of delinquency and drug use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
49(3), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01058-3
106.
Zonneveld, E. M. van. (2019). Early intervention in children at high risk of future criminal behaviour: Indicationsfrom neurocognitive and neuroaffective mechanisms (Doctoral dissertation). https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/78818
