Among the measures assessing peer reputation, the Extended Class Play (ECP) is now used extensively in North American settings. Little information is available in other cultural contexts. Furthermore, practical considerations suggest developing a shorter form of the ECP to be used in socio-educational environments. This study examined the ECP dimensions of peer assessment in Italy as well as developed a shorter form of the measure. We revised the ECP using factor analyses according to an explorative-confirmatory approach. The original 37-item ECP was shortened to a 22-item version and, subsequently, the properties of the revised measure were evaluated. We performed two studies comprising, respectively, 643 (55% male; 97% Italian; Mage = 12.20, SD = 0.60) and 652 (58% male; 94% Italian; Mage = 12.26, SD = 0.66) seventh-grade young adolescents living in southern and central Italy. Results revealed a clear and consistent seven-factor structure and acceptable levels of reliability and validity. Factors included constructs such as Shyness-Withdrawal, Prosociality-Leadership, Aggression, Popularity-Sociability, Victimization, Rejection-Exclusion, and Boastfulness. Correlations between the dimensions of the 22-item ECP and teacher ratings of young adolescents’ behaviors further confirmed the validity of the solution. Findings suggest the importance of culturally revised measures of social reputation and indicate that the short form of the ECP has considerable promise to be considered a valuable measure to assess the multidimensional aspects of peer relationships.
ArgyleM.HendersonM.BondM.IizukaY.ContarelloA. (1986).
Cross-cultural variations in relationship rules. International Journal of Psychology,
21, 287–315. doi:10.1080/00207598608247591
2.
AssirelliG.TosiM. (2013).
Education and family ties in Italy, France and Sweden. Journal of Educational and Social Research,
3, 379–387. doi:10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n7p379
3.
BobbioA.SarricaM. (2009).
Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism: An Italian adaptation of Singelis et al.’s scale and its relations with conflict management and leadership styles. Testing, Psychometrics. Methodology in Applied Psychology,
16, 209–226. doi:10.4473/TPM.16.4.3
4.
BowkerJ. C.RubinK. H.Buskirk-CohenA.Rose-KrasnorL.Booth-LaForceC. (2010).
Behavioral changes predicting temporal changes in perceived popular status. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,
31, 126–133. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2009.10.002
5.
BrockS. E.NickersonA.O’MalleyM. D.ChangY. (2006).
Understanding children victimized by their peers. Journal of School Violence,
5, 3–18. doi:10.1300/J202v05n03_02
6.
BuhsE. S.LaddG. W.Herald-BrownS. L. (2010). Victimization and exclusion: Links to peer rejection, classroom engagement, and achievement. In JimersonS. R.SwearerS. M. (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 163–172).
New York, NY:
Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
7.
BukowskiW. M.CillessenA. H. N.VelásquezA. M. (2012). Peer ratings. In LaursenB.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 211–228).
New York, NY:
The Guilford Press.
8.
CasigliaA. C.Lo CocoA.ZappullaC. (1998).
Aspects of social reputation and peer relationships in Italian children: A cross-cultural perspective. Developmental Psychology,
34, 723–730. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.4.723
9.
ChenF. F. (2007).
Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,
14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
10.
ChenX. (2012).
Culture, peer interaction, and socioemotional development. Child Development Perspectives,
6, 27–34. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00187.x
11.
ChenX.DongQ.ZhouH. (1997).
Authoritative and authoritarian parenting practices and social and school performance in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development,
21, 855–873. doi:10.1080/016502597384703
12.
ChenX.FrenchD. C. (2008).
Children’s social competence in cultural context. Annual Review of Psychology,
59, 591–616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093606
13.
ChenX.HeY.De OliveiraA. M.Lo CocoA.ZappullaC.KasparV., … DeSouzaA. (2004).
Loneliness and social adaptation in Brazilian, Canadian, Chinese and Italian children: A multi-national comparative study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
45, 1373–1384. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00329.x
14.
ChenX.RubinK. H. (Eds.). (2011). Socioemotional development in cultural context.
New York, NY:
Guilford.
15.
ChenX.ZappullaC.Lo CocoA.SchneiderB.KasparV.De OliveiraA. M., … Chi-Hang TseH. (2004).
Self-perceptions of competence in Brazilian, Canadian, Chinese and Italian children: Relations with social and school adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development,
28, 129–138. doi:10.1080/01650250344000334
16.
CillessenA. H. N.MarksP. E. L. (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. In MarksP. E. L.CillessenA. H. N. (Eds.), New directions in peer nomination methodology. New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol.
157, pp. 21–44).
Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/cad.20206
17.
CorreiaJ. V.SantosA. J.FreitasM.RosadoA.RubinK. (2014).
Análise fatorial confirmatória do Extended Class Play numa amostra portuguesa de jovens adolescents [Confirmatory factor analysis of Extended Class Play in a Portuguese sample of young adolescents]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica,
27, 462–471. doi:10.1590/1678-7153.201427306
18.
CorsaroW.MaynardD. W. (1996). Format tying in discussion and argumentation among Italian and American children. In SlobinD.GerhardtJ. (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language. Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 157–184).
Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
19.
CoxeS.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2009).
The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment,
91, 121–136. doi:10.1080/00223890802634175
GazelleH.LaddG. W. (2003).
Anxious solitude and peer exclusion: A diathesis–stress model of internalizing trajectories in childhood. Child Development,
74(1), 257–278. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00534
22.
GazelleH.RudolphK. D. (2004).
Moving toward and away from the world: Social approach and avoidance trajectories in anxious solitary youth. Child Development,
75, 829–849. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00709.x
23.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
24.
GommansR.CillessenA. H. (2015).
Nominating under constraints: A systematic comparison of unlimited and limited peer nomination methodologies in elementary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development,
39, 77–86. doi:10.1177/0165025414551761
25.
HanishL. D.GuerraN. G. (2002).
A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology,
14(1), 69–89.
26.
HightowerA. D.WorkW. C.CowenE. L.LotyczewskiB. S.SpinellA. P.GuareJ. C.RohrbeckC. A. (1986).
The Teacher-Child Rating Scale: A brief objective measure of elementary school children’s school problem behaviors and competencies. School Psychology Review,
15(3), 393–409.
Italian Association of Psychology. (2015). Codice etico per la ricerca in psicologia [Ethical code for psychological research]. Retrieved from http://www.aipass.org/node/11560
IvesA. R. (2015).
For testing the significance of regression coefficients, go ahead and log-transform count data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution,
6, 828–835. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12386
32.
KalutskayaI. N.BuhsE. S. (2015).
Social withdrawal in Russian youth: Using the Extended Class Play to examine socio-emotional and academic adjustment. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth,
20, 485–500. doi:10.1080/02673843.2013.806270
33.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.).
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
34.
LaddG. W.BurgessK. B. (2001).
Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment?Child Development,
72, 1579–1601. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00366
35.
Lo Cricchio, M. G., Lo Coco, A., Cheah, C., & Liga, F. (2019). The good parent: Southern Italian mothers' conceptualization of good parenting and parent -child relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 40, 1583--1603.
36.
MaasC. J.HoxJ. J. (2005).
Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology,
1, 86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
37.
MastenA. S.MorisonP.PellegriniD. S. (1985).
A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology,
21, 523–533. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.3.523
38.
MercerS. H.DeRosierM. E. (2008).
Teacher preference, peer rejection, and student aggression: A prospective study of transactional influence and independent contributions to emotional adjustment and grades. Journal of School Psychology,
46, 661–685. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.006
39.
MuthénB. O.MuthénL. K. (2014). Mplus (Version 7.2) [Computer software].
Los Angeles, CA:
Muthén & Muthén.
40.
NelsonD. A.RobinsonC. C.HartC. H.AlbanoA. D.MarshallS. J. (2010).
Italian preschoolers’ peer-status linkages with sociability and subtypes of aggression and victimization. Social Development,
19, 698–720. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00551.x
41.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000).
SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,
32, 396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
42.
OhW.RubinK. H.BowkerJ. C.Booth-LaForceC.Rose-KrasnorL.LaursenB. (2008).
Trajectories of social withdrawal from middle childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,
36, 553–566. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9199-z
43.
OishiS.DienerE.LucasR. E.SuhE. M. (1999).
Cross-cultural variation in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
25, 980–990. doi:10.1177/01461672992511006
44.
PrinsteinM. J.RancourtD.GuerryJ. D.BrowneC. B. (2009). Peer reputations and psychological adjustment. In RubinK. H.BukowskiW.LaursenB. (Eds.), The handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 548–567).
New York, NY:
Guilford.
45.
RealmutoG. M.AugustG. J.SielerJ. D.Pessoa-BrandaoL. (1997).
Peer assessment of social reputation in community samples of disruptive and nondisruptive children: Utility of the revised class play method. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,
26, 67–73. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2601_7
46.
RoeserR. W.EcclesJ. S.SameroffA. J. (2000).
School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal,
100(5), 443–471.
47.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.BowkerJ. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In LernerR. M. (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Ecological settings and processes (7th ed., Vol.
4, pp. 321–412).
Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons Inc. doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy405
48.
RubinK. H.ChenX.HymelS. (1993).
Socioemotional characteristics of withdrawn and aggressive children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,
39, 518–534. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23087247
49.
RubinK. H.CheahC.MenzerM. M. (2010). Peers. In BornsteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of cultural developmental science (pp. 223–237).
New York, NY:
Psychology Press.
50.
RubinK. H.HemphillS. A.ChenX.HastingsP.SansonA.Lo CocoA., . . . ChenH. (2006).
A cross-cultural study of behavioral inhibition in toddlers: East–West–North–South. International Journal of Behavioral Development,
30, 219–226. doi:10.1177/0165025406066723
51.
RubinK. H.MillsR. S. L. (1988).
The many faces of social isolation in childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
56, 916–924. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.916
52.
RubinK. H.WojslawowiczJ. C.Rose-KrasnorL.Booth-LaForceC.BurgessK. B. (2006).
The best friendships of shy/withdrawn children: Prevalence, stability, and relationship quality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,
34, 139–153. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-9017-4
53.
SantinelloM.VienoA. (2003).
Contributo all’adattamento italiano della Teacher-Child Rating Scale [Contribution to the Italian adaptation of the Teacher-Child Rating Scale]. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata,
241, 37–43.
54.
SmithG. T.McCarthyD. M.AndersonK. G. (2000).
On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment,
12, 102–111. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102
55.
van den BergY. H. M.LansuT. A. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2015).
Measuring social status and social behavior with peer and teacher nomination methods. Social Development,
24, 815–832. doi:10.1111/sode.12120
56.
Van de SchootR.LugtigP.HoxJ. (2012).
A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology,
9, 486–492. doi:10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
57.
WinderC. L.WigginsJ. S. (1964).
Social reputation and social behavior: A further validation of the Peer Nomination Inventory. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
68, 681–684. doi:10.1037/h0039885
58.
Wojslawowicz BowkerJ. C.RubinK. H.BurgessK. B.Booth-LaForceC.Rose-KrasnorL. (2006).
Behavioral characteristics associated with stable and fluid best friendship patterns in middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,
52(4), 671–693. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23096029
59.
ZellerM.VannattaK.SchaferJ.NollR. B. (2003).
Behavioral reputation: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology,
39, 129–139. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.129
60.
ZwickW. R.VelicerW. F. (1986).
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin,
99, 432–442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432
