The purpose of this study was to examine the dimensional structure of the Arabic version of the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule using a sample of undergraduate students from a private university in the Sultanate of Oman. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test four preconceptualized item-fit models: a one-factor structure model, a two-factor model using a factor structure of items converging on Positive Affect and Negative Affect, a correlated two-factor model, and finally the correlated three-factor model. Strongest support was found for the correlated two-factor model. A recent study provided further evidence of the robust structure of the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule using the two-factor model. This study tested the model in a non-Western culture and a population that was very different from that in previous studies. The implications of these findings and recommendations are discussed herein.
BeckJ. G.NovyD. M.DiefenbachG. J.StanleyM. A.AverillP. M.SwannA. C. (2003).
Differentiating anxiety and depression in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Psychological Assessment,
15, 184–192. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.131
2.
BuzJ.Perez-ArechaederraD.Fernandez-PulidoR.UrchagaD. (2015).
Factorial structure and measurement invariance of the PANAS in Spanish older adults. The Spanish Journal of Psychology,
18(e3), 1–11. doi:10.1017/sjp.2015.6
3.
ChangE. C.AsakawaK. (2003).
Cultural variations on optimistic and pessimistic bias for self versus a sibling: Is there evidence for self-enhancement in the West and for self-criticism in the East when the referent group is specified?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
84(3), 569–581. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.569
4.
CrawfordJ. R.HenryJ. D. (2004).
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology,
24, 245–265. doi:10.1348/0144665031752934
5.
CrockerP. R. (1997).
A confirmatory factor analysis of the positive affect and negative affect Schedule PANAS with a youth sport sample. Journal of Sport & Executive Psychology,
19, 91–97. doi:10.1123/jsep.19.1.91
6.
DePaoliL. C.SweeneyD. C. (2000).
Further validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,
15(4), 561–568.
7.
EkmanP. (1993).
Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist,
48(4), 384–392. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.384
8.
GalinhaI. C.PereiraC. R.EstevesF. G. (2013).
Confirmatory factor analysis and temporal invariance of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica,
26(4), 671–679. doi:10.1590/S0102-79722013000400007
9.
GaudreauP.SanchezX.BlondinJ. P. (2006).
Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting: Testing the factorial structure of the PANAS across two samples of French-Canadian participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
22, 240–249. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.4.240
10.
HeubeckB. G.WilkinsonR. (2019).
Is all fit that glitters gold? Comparisons of two, three and bi-factor models for Watson, Clark & Tellegen’s 20-item state and trait PANAS. Personality and Individual Differences,
144, 132–140. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.002
11.
HilleråsP. K.JormA. F.HerlitzA.WinbladB. (1998).
Negative and positive affect among the very old: A survey on a sample age 90 years or older. Research on Aging,
20, 593–610. doi:10.1177/0164027598205003
12.
HuebnerE. S.DewT. (1995).
Preliminary validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule with adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
13, 286–293. doi:10.1177/073428299501300307
13.
JoinerT. E.SandinB.ChorokP.LostaoL.MarqurinaG. (1997).
Development and factor analytic validation of the SPANAS among women in Spain: (More) cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood. Journal of Personality Assessment,
68, 600–615. doi:10.1207/s15327752.jpa6803_8
14.
KercherK. (1992).
Assessing subjective well-being in the old-old: The PANAS as a measure of orthogonal dimensions of positive and negative affect. Research on Aging,
14, 131–168. doi:10.1177/0164027592142001
15.
KillgoreW. D. (2000).
Evidence for a third factor on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule PANAS in a college student sample. Perceptional and Motor Skills,
90, 147–152. doi:10.2466//pms.2000.90.1.147
16.
KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.MatsumotoH.NorasakkunkitV. (1997).
Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
72(6), 1245–1267. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1245
17.
KrohneH. W.EgloffB.KohlmannC. W.TauschA. (1996).
Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica,
42, 139–156.
18.
LazarusR. S. (1999). The cognition–emotion debate: A bit of history. In DalgleishT.PowerR. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 3–19).
New York, NY:
John Wiley.
19.
LeueA.BeauducelA. (2011).
The PANAS structure revisited: On the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment,
23(1), 215–225. doi:10.1037/a0021400
20.
LoniganC. I.HooeE. S.DavidC. F.KistnerJ. A. (1999).
Positive and negative affectivity in children: Confirmatory factor analysis of a two-factor model and its relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
67(3), 374–386. doi:10.1037/0022.006x.67.3.374
21.
MackinnonA.JormA.ChristensenH.KortenA.JacombP.RodgersB. (1999).
A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences,
27, 405–416. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7
22.
MehrabianA. (1997).
Comparison of the PAD and PANAS as models for describing emotions and for differentiating anxiety from depression. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment,
19, 331–357. doi:10.1007/BF02229025
23.
MehrabianA. (2009). “Silent messages”—A wealth of information about nonverbal communication (body language). Personality & Emotion Tests & Software: Psychological Books & Articles of Popular Interest. Los Angeles, CA: Self-Published. Retrieved April 6, 2010.
24.
MelvinG. A.MolloyG. N. (2000).
Some psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule among Australian youth. Psychological Reports,
86, 1209–1212. doi:10.2466/pr02000.86.3c.1209
25.
MerzE. L.RoeschS. C. (2011).
Modelling trait and state variation using multilevel factor analysis with PANAS daily diary data. Journal of Research in Personality,
45, 2–9. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.003
26.
MolloyG. N.PallantJ. F.KantasA. (2001).
A psychometric comparison of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule across age and sex. Psychological Reports,
88(3 Pt 1), 861–862. doi:10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3.861
27.
NarayananL.MenonS.SpectorP. E. (1999a).
Stress in the workplace: A comparison of gender and occupations. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
20, 63–73. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199901)20:1<63::AID-JOB873>3.0.CO;2-J
28.
NarayananL.MenonS.SpectorP. E. (1999b).
A cross-cultural comparison of job stressors and reactions among employees holding comparable jobs in two countries. International Journal of Stress Management,
6(3), 197–212. doi:10.1023/A:1021986709317
29.
NasserR. (2005).
A method for social scientists to adapt instruments from one culture to another: The case of the job descriptive index. Journal of Social Science,
1(4), 232–237. doi:10.3844/jssp.2005.232.237
30.
NasserR.AbouchedidK. (2002).
Attributions for the causes of peace and locus of control: Their relation in a country where there is conflict. Current Research in Social Psychology,
7(7), 94–113. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/∼grpproc/crisp/crisp.7.7.htm
31.
Ortuño-SierraJ.Santarén-RosellM.De AlbénizA. P.Fonseca-PedreroE. (2015).
Dimensional structure of the Spanish version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in adolescents and young adults. Psychological Assessment,
27(3), e1–e9. doi:10.1037/pas0000107
32.
PandeyR.SrivastavaN. (2008).
Psychometric evaluation of a Hindi version of positive-negative affect schedule. Industrial Psychiatry Journal,
17, 59–54.
33.
PerunovicW. Q.HellerD.RafaeliE. (2007).
Within-person positive emotion culture 5 changes in the structure of emotion: The role of cultural identification and language. Psychological Science,
18, 607–613. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01947.x
34.
PlutchikR. (1994). The psychology and biology of emotion.
New York, NY:
HarperCollins.
35.
SchimmackU.GrobA. (2000).
Dimensional models of core affect: A quantitative comparison by means of structural equation modeling. European Journal of Personality,
14, 325–345. doi:10.1002/1099-0984(200007/08)14:4::AID-PER3803.0.CO;2-I
36.
SchimmackU.OishiS.DienerE. (2002).
Cultural influences on the relation between pleasant emotions and unpleasant emotions: Asian dialectic philosophies or individualism-collectivism?Cognition and Emotion,
16(6), 705–719. doi:10.1080/02699930143000590
37.
SchmuckleS. C.EgloffB.BurnzI. R. (2002).
The relationship between positive and negative affect in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Journal of Research in Personality,
36(5), 463–475. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00007-7
38.
Seib-PfeiferL. E.PugnaghiG.BeauducelA.LeueA. (2017).
On the replication of factor structures of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Personality and Individual Differences,
107, 201–207. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.053
39.
ShapiroA. M.RobertsJ. E.BeckJ. G. (1999).
Differentiating symptoms of anxiety and depression in older adults: Distinct cognitive and affective profiles?Cognitive Therapy and Research,
23, 53–74. doi:10.1023/A:1018710707960
40.
SteigerJ. H. (2000).
Point estimation, hypothesis testing, and interval estimation using the RMSEA: Some comments and reply to Hayduk and Glasser. Structural Equation Modelling,
7, 149–162. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_1
41.
TerraccianoA.McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2003).
Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
19(2), 131–141. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131
42.
Thompson, R. A., & Meyer S. (2007). Socialization of emotion regulation in the family. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 249–268).
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
43.
TitchenerE. B. (1908). The psychology of feeling and attention.
New York, NY:
Macmillan.
44.
TuccittoD. E.GiacobbiP. R.Jr.LeiteW. L. (2010).
The internal structure of positive and negative affect: A confirmatory factor analysis of the PANAS. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
70, 125–141. doi:10.1177/0013164409344522
45.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1997).
The measurement and mismeasurement of mood: Recurrent and emergent issues. Journal of Personality Assessment,
86, 267–296. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6802_4
46.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988).
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
54(6), 1063–2. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
47.
WatsonD.TellegenA. (1985).
Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychology Bulletin,
98, 219–235. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219
48.
WundtW. (1896). Grundriss der Psychologic [Floor plan of psychologic]. (Trans, by C. Judd of 1896 and 1907 editions as Outlines of psychology.) Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.
49.
YuC. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
