Objectification at work reflects instrumentality and denial of humanness in work relationships. These relationships have deleterious consequences for workplace health. One of the consequences of this type of relationship is self-objectification in which the self is perceived as a non-person or as an object. This phenomenon leads to perceiving oneself without mental states (i.e., dementalization) or as an instrument (i.e., instrumentalization) and as a nonperson (i.e., loss of humanness). However, few studies have considered how to reduce these consequences. In this study, we examine the protective role of meaning at work against the consequences of objectification. A total of 153 employees answered an online questionnaire which measured objectification, meaning of work, mentalization, and instrumentality/humanness. The results highlight an impact of objectification on instrumentality and humanness but not on mentalization as in previous studies. There is also a moderation effect of the meaning of work on the relationship between objectification and humanness. These results lead us to consider instrumentality, humanness, and dementalization as separate constructs accounting for self-objectification.
AndelaM.AuzoultL.TruchotD. (2014).
An exploratory study of self-consciousness and emotion regulation strategies in health care workers. Psychological Reports,
115, 106–114. doi:10.2466/20.16.PR0.115c17z4
2.
AndrighettoL.BaldissarriC.GabbiadiniA.SacinoA.ValtortaR. R.VolpatoC. (2018).
Objectified conformity: Working self-objectification increases conforming behavior. Social Influence,
13, 78–90. doi:10.1080/15534510.2018.1439769
3.
AndrighettoL.BaldissariC.VolpatoC. (2017). (
Still) Modern times: Objectification at work. European Journal of Social Psychology,
47, 25–35. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2190
4.
AuzoultL.PersonnazB. (2016).
The role of organizational culture and self-consciousness in self-objectification in the workplace. TPM—Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology,
23, 271–284.
5.
BaldissariC.AndrighettoL.GabbiadiniA.VolpatoC. (2017).
Work and freedom? Working self-objectification and belief in personal free will. British Journal of Social Psychology,
56, 250–269. doi:10.1111/bjso.12172
6.
BaldissariC.AndrighettoL.VolpatoC. (2014).
When work does not ennoble man: Psychological consequences of working objectification. TPM—Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology,
21, 327–339.
7.
BaldissariC.AndrighettoL.VolpatoC. (2017).
Workers as objects: The nature of working objectification and the role of perceived alienation. TPM—Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology,
24, 1–14. doi:10.4473/TPM24.2.
8.
BastianB.HaslamN. (2011).
Experiencing dehumanization: Cognitive and emotional effects of everyday dehumanization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
33, 295–303. doi:10.1080/01973533.2011.614132
9.
BaumeisterR. F. (1991). Meanings of life.
New York, NY:
The Guilford Press.
10.
BudesheimT. L. (2014). Exploring the dark matter of objectification. In . BornsteinB. H. WienerR. L (Eds.), Justice, conflict and wellbeing (pp. 97–125).
New York, NY:
Springer.
11.
CaesensG.StinglhamberF.DemoulinS.De WildeM. (2017).
Perceived organizational support and employees’ well-being: The mediating role of organizational dehumanization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,
26, 527–540. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2017.1319817
12.
ChalofskyN. (2003).
An emerging construct of meaningful work. Human Resources Development International,
6, 69–83.
13.
CheneyG.CarrollC. (1997).
The person as object in discourses in and around organizations. Communication Research,
24, 593–630.
14.
ChristoffK. (2014).
Dehumanization in organizational settings: Some scientific and ethical considerations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
8, 1–5. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00748
15.
DimitrovD. (2012).
Sources of meaningfulness in the workplace: A study in the US hospitality sector. European Journal of Training and Development,
36, 351–371. doi:10.1108/03090591211204788
16.
DurkheimE. (1893). De la division du travail social [The division of social work].
Paris, France:
Felix Alcan.
17.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997).
Objectification theory: An explanation for women’s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Woman Quarterly,
21, 173–206.
18.
FrommE. (1956). The sane society.
London, England:
Routledge.
19.
GervaisS. J.WienerR. L.AllenJ.FarnumK. S.KimbleK. (2016).
Do you see what I see? The consequences of objectification in work settings for experiencers and third party predictors. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy,
16, 143–174. doi:10.1111/asap.12118
20.
GhorbaniN.CunninghamC. J. L.WatsonP. J. (2010).
Comparative analysis of integrative self-knowledge, mindfulness and private self-consciousness in predicting responses to stress in Iran. International Journal of Psychology,
45, 147–154. doi:10.1080/00207590903473768.
21.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ. C.GalinskiA. D. (2008).
Power and the Objectification of Social Targets. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,
95, 111–127. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111.
22.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign.
Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
23.
HaqueO. S.WaytzA. (2012).
Dehumanization in medicine: Causes, solutions, and functions. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
7, 176–186. doi:10.1177/1745691611429706
24.
HaslamN. (2006).
Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
10, 252–264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
25.
HaslamN.BainP. (2007).
Humanizing the self: Moderators of the attribution of lesser humanness to others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
33, 57–68. doi:10.1177/0146167206293191
26.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach.
New York, NY:
The Guilford Press.
27.
HillP. L.TurianoN. A. (2014).
Purpose in life as a predictor of mortality across adulthood. Psychological Science,
25, 1482–1486.
28.
KahnW. A. (1990).
Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal,
33, 692–724.
29.
KnoopR. (1994).
Relieving stress through value-rich work. The Journal of Social Psychology,
134, 829–836.
30.
LandauM. J.SullivanD.KeeferL. A.RothschildZ. K.OsmanM. R. (2012).
Subjectivity uncertainty theory of objectification: Compensating for uncertainty about how to positively relate to others by downplaying their subjective attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
48, 1234–1246. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.003
31.
LangtonR. (2011).
Sexual solipsism: Philosophical essays on pornography and objectification. European Journal of Philosophy,
19, 327–334. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00478.x
32.
LoughnanS.BaldissarriC.SpaccatiniF.ElderL. (2017).
Internalizing objectification: Objectified individuals see themselves as less warm, competent, moral, and human. British Journal of Social Psychology,
56, 217–232. doi:10.1111/bjso.12188
33.
MarxK. (1944). The economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844. In . TuckerR (Ed.), The marx/engels reader (pp. 66–125).
New York, NY:
Norton & Company.
34.
MayD. R.GilsonR. L.HarterL. M. (2004).
The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology,
77, 11–37.
35.
MullenB.SulsJ. (1982).
Know thyself: Stressful life changes and the ameliorative effect of private self-consciousness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
18, 43–55. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(82)90080-4
36.
NussbaumM. C. (1995).
Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs,
24, 249–291.
37.
OsborneJ. W. (2003).
Effect sizes and the disattenuation of correlation and regression coefficient: Lessons from educational psychology. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,
8. http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=11
38.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003).
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,
88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
39.
RochfordK. C.JackA. I.BoyatzisR. E.FrenchS. E. (2016).
Ethical leadership as a balance between opposing neural networks. Journal of Business Ethics,
144, 755–770. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3264-x
40.
RossoB. D.DekasK. H.WrzesniewskiA. (2010).
On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior,
30, 91–127. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
41.
RyffC. D.SingerB. (1998).
The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry,
9, 1–28.
42.
ShieldsJ.GrantD. (2010).
Psychologising the Subject: HRM, Commodification, and the Objectification of Labour. The Economic and Labour Relations Review,
20, 61–76.
43.
SulsJ.FletcherB. (1985).
Self-attention, life stress and illness: A prospective study. Psychosomatic Medicine,
47, 469–481. doi:10.1097/00006842-198509000-00007
44.
SzymanskiD. M.FeltmanC. E. (2015).
Linking sexually objectifying work environments among waitresses to psychological and job-related outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
39, 390–404. doi:10.1177/0361684314565345
45.
SzymanskiD. M.MikorskiR. (2016).
Sexually objectifying restaurants and waitresses’ burnout and intentions to leave: The roles of power and support. Sex Roles,
75, 328–338. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0621-210.1007/s11199-016-0621-2
46.
SchnellT.HögeT.PolletE. (2013).
Predicting meaning in work: Theory, data, implications. The Journal of Positive Psychology,
8, 543–554. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.830763
47.
TimmermansS.AlmelingR. (2009).
Objectification, standardization, and commodification in health care: A conceptual readjustment. Social Science & Medicine,
69, 21–27. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.020
48.
VolpatoC.AndrighettoL. (2015).
Dehumanization. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences,
6, 31–37.
49.
VolpatoC.AndrighettoL.BaldissariC. (2017).
Perceptions of low-status workers and the maintenance of the social class status quo. Journal of Social Issues,
73, 192–210. doi:10.1111/josi.12211
50.
WienerR. L.GervaisS. L.AllenJ.MarquezA. (2013).
Eye of the beholder: Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,
19, 206–221. doi:10.1037/a0028497
51.
WollastR.PuviaE.BernardP.TevichapongP.KleinO. (2018).
How sexual objectification generates dehumanization in Western and Eastern cultures, a comparison between Belgium and Thailand. Swiss Journal of Psychology,
77, 69–82. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000209
52.
WrzesniewskiA.DuttonJ. E. (2001).
Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review,
26, 179–201.
