The Rey 15-Item Test and reliable digit span were evaluated in Japan. Participants were controls (n = 15), healthy volunteers instructed to simulate memory impairment (n = 12; 5 of 17 volunteers did not comply with instructions and were dropped), healthy elderly (n = 12), and cognitively disabled nursing home residents (n = 8). On the 15-Item Test, controls and elderly performed similarly and were combined. Nursing home residents could not cope with the 15-Item Test and were dropped. Total score was a fair predictor of dissimulation using a cutoff ≤ 8. Rows were fair predictors using a ≤2 cutoff. Sensitivities were low and specificities were excellent. Reliable digit span contrasts between simulators and each of the other groups demonstrated that reliable digit span discriminated controls and elderly from simulators (≤6 and ≤5 cutoffs). Sensitivities were moderate and specificities were excellent. Reliable digit span did not differentiate simulators from nursing home residents.
ArnettP. A.HammekeT. A.SchwartzL. (1995) Qualitative and quantitative performance on Rey’s 15-Item Test in neurological patients and dissimulators. The Clinical Neuropsychologists9: 17–26. doi:10.1080/13854049508402052.
2.
BaileyK. C.SobleJ. R.O’RourkeJ. J. F. (2018) Clinical utility of the Rey 15-Item Test, recognition trial, and error scores for detecting noncredible neuropsychological performance in a mixed clinical sample of veterans. The Clinical Neuropsychologist32: 119–131. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1333151.
3.
BackC.BooneK. B.ParksC.BurgoyneK.SilverB. (1996) The performance of schizophrenics on three cognitive tests of malingering, Rey 15-Item Test, Rey Dot Counting, and Hiscock forced-choice method. Assessment3: 449–457. doi:10.1177/107319119600300411.
4.
BernardL. C.FowlerW. (1990) Assessing the validity of memory complaints: Performance of brain-damaged and normal individuals on Rey’s task to detect malingering. Journal of Clinical Psychology46: 432–436. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199007)46:4<432::AID-JCLP2270460410>3.0.CO;2-0.
5.
BooneK. B.SalazarX.LuP.Warner-ChaconK.RazaniJ. (2002) The Rey 15-Item Recognition Trial: A technique to enhance sensitivity of the Rey 15-Item Memorization test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology24: 561–573. doi:10.1076/jcen.24.5.561.1004.
6.
BortnikK. E.HornerM. D.BachmanD. L. (2013) Performance on standard indexes of effort among patients with dementia. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult20: 233–242. doi:10.1080/09084282.2012.695757.
7.
BurtonV.Vilar-LopezR.PuenteA. E. (2012) Measuring effort in neuropsychological evaluations of forensic cases of Spanish-speakers. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology27: 262–267. doi:10.1093/arclin/acs026.
8.
BushS. S.RuffR. M.TrosterA. I.BarthJ. T.KofflerS. P.PliskinN. H., et al. (2005) Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy and planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology20: 41426. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002.
9.
DeanA. C.VictorT. L.BooneK. B.PhilpottL. M.HessR. A. (2009) Dementia and effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist23: 133–152. doi:10.1080/13854040701819050.
10.
DuncanS. A.AusbornD. L. (2002) The use of reliable digit span to detect malingering in a criminal forensic pretrial population. Assessment9: 56–61. doi:10.1177/1073191102009001007.
11.
Fazio, R. L., Faris, A. N., & Yamout, K. Z. (in press). Use of the Rey 15-Item Test as a performance validity test in an elderly population. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/23279095.2017.1353994.
12.
FlahertyJ. M.SpencerR. J.DragL. L.PangilinanP. H.BieliauskusL. A. (2015) Limited usefulness of the Rey Fifteen-Item test in detection of invalid performance in veterans suspected of mild traumatic brain-injury. Brain Injury29: 1630–1634. doi:10.3109/02699052.2015.1075249.
13.
FrazierT. W.FrazierA. R.BuschR. M.KerwoodM. A.DemareeH. A. (2008) Detection of simulated ADHD and reading disorder using symptom validity measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology23: 501–509. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2008.04.001.
14.
Gasquoine, P. G., Weiner, A. A., & Amador, A. (2017). Specificity rates for nonclinical, bilingual, Mexican Americans on three popular performance validity measures. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31, 587–597. doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.127786.
15.
GreenC. M.KirkJ. W.ConneryA. K.BakerKirkwoodM. W. (2014) The use of the Rey 15-Item Test and recognition trial to evaluate noncredible effort after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology36: 261–267. doi:10.1080/13803395.2013.879096.
16.
GigerP.MertenT. (2013) Swiss population-based reference data for six symptom validity tests. Clinica y Salud24: 153–159. doi:10.1016/S1130-5274(13)70016-1.
17.
GoldbergJ. O.MillerH. R. (1986) Performance of psychiatric inpatients and intellectually deficient individuals on a task that assesses the validity of memory complaints. Journal of Clinical Psychology42: 792–795. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198609)42:5<792::AID-JCLP2270420519>3.0.CO;2-8.
18.
GreiffensteinM. F.BakerW. J.GolaT. (1994) Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment6: 218–224. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.3.218.
19.
GriffinG. A.NormingtonJ.GlassmireD. (1996) Qualitative dimensions in scoring the Rey Visual Memory Test in malingering. Psychological Assessment8: 383–387. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.383.
20.
GuilmetteT. J.HartJ. K.GiulianoA. J.LeiningerB. E. (1994) Detecting simulated memory impairment: Comparison of the Rey Fifteen-Item Test and the Hiscock Forced-Choice Procedure. The Clinical Neuropsychologist8: 283–294. doi:10.1080/13854049408404135.
21.
HaysJ. R.EmmonsJ.LawsonK. A. (1993) Psychiatric norms for the Rey 15-Item Visual Memory Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills79: 1331–1334. doi:10.2466/pms.1993.76.3c.1331.
22.
HaysJ. R.EmmonsJ.StallingsG. (2000) Dementia and mental retardation markers on the Rey 15-Item Visual Memory Test. Psychological Reports86: 179–182. doi:10.2466/pr0.2000.86.1.179.
23.
JasinskiL. J.BerryD. T. R.ShanderaA. L.ClarkJ. A. (2011) Use of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale digit span subtest for malingering detection: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology33: 300–314. doi:10.1080/13803395.2010.516743.
24.
KaufmanA. S.McLeanJ. E.ReynoldsC. R. (1988) Sex, race, residence, region, and educational differences on the 11 WAIS-R subtests. Journal of Clinical Psychology44: 231–248. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198803)44:2<231::AID-JCLP2270440224>3.0.CO;2-J.
25.
KellyP. J.BakerG. A.van den BroekM. D.JacksonH.HumphriesG. (2005) The detection of malingering in memory performance: The sensitivity and specificity of four measures in a UK population. British Journal of Clinical Psychology44: 333–341. doi:10.1348/014466505X35687.
26.
KiewelN. A.WisdomN. M.BradshawM. R.PastorekN. J.StruttA. M. (2012) A retrospective review of digit span-related effort indicator in probable Alzheimer’s disease patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologists26: 965–974. doi:10.1080/13854046.2012.694478.
27.
LeeG. P.LoringD. W.MartinR. C. (1992) Rey’s 15-Item Visual Memory Test for the detection of malingering: Normative observations on patients with neurological disorders. Psychological Assessment4: 43–46. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.43.
28.
LoringD. W.GoldsteinF. C.ChenC.DraneD. L.LahJ. J.ZhaoL.GlennJ.Larrabee for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2016) (2016) False-positive error rates for Reliable Digit Span and Auditory Verbal Learning Test performance validity measures in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer disease. Archive of Clinical Neuropsychology31: 313–331. doi:10.1093/arclin/acw014.
29.
LoveC. M.GlassmireD. M.ZanoliniS.WolfA. (2014) Specificity and false positive rates of the Test of Memory Malingering, Rey 15-Item Test, and Rey Word Recognition Test among forensic inpatients with intellectual disabilities. Assessment21: 618–627. doi:10.1177/1073191114528028.
30.
LezakM. D. (1995) Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford.
31.
MathiasC. W.GreveK. W.BianchiniK. J.HoustonR. J.CrouchJ. A. (2002) Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction using reliable digit span in traumatic brain injury. Assessment9: 301–308. doi:10.1177/1073191102009003009.
32.
MertenT.GreenP.HenryM.BlaskewitzN.BrockhausR. (2005) Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology20: 719–726. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004.
33.
Miller, J, B., Millis, S. R., Rapport, L. J., Bashem, J. R., Hanks, R. A., & Axelrod, B. N. (2011). Detection of insufficient effort using the advanced clinical solutions for the Wechsler Memory Scale, Fourth Edition. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25, 160–172. doi:10.1080/13854046.2010.533197.
34.
MillisS. R.KlerS. (1995) Limitations of the Rey Fifteen-Item test in the detection of malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist9: 241–244. doi:10.1080/13854049508400486.
35.
MindtM. R.ByrdD.SaezP.ManlyJ. (2010) Increasing culturally competent neuropsychological services for ethnic minority populations: A call to action. The Clinical Neuropsychologist24: 429–453. doi:10.1080/13854040903058960.
36.
MorganS. F. (1991) Effect of true memory impairment on a test of memory complaint validity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology6: 327–334. doi:10.1093/arclin/6.4.327.
37.
MorseC. L.Douglas-NewmanK.MandelS.Swirsky-SacchettiT. (2013) Utility of the Rey recognition trial to detect invalid performance in forensic neuropsychological sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist27: 1395–1407. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.832385.
38.
MyersW. C.HallR. C. W.Tolou-ShamsM. (2013) Prevalence and assessment of malingering in homicide defendants using the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Rey 15-Item Test. Homicide Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal17: 314–328. doi:10.1177/108876791246560.
39.
NelsonN. W.BooneK.DueckA.WagenerL.LuP.GrillsC. (2003) Relationships between eight measures of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist17: 263–272. doi:10.1076/clin.17.2.263.16511.
40.
Nijdam-JonesA.RosenfeldB. (2017) Cross-cultural feigning assessment: A systematic review of feigning instruments used with linguistically, ethically, and culturally diverse samples. Psychological Assessment29: 1321–1336. doi:10.1037/pas0000438.
41.
ReeseC. S.SuhrJ. A.RiddleT. L. (2012) Exploration of indices in the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition Digit Span subtest. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology27: 176–181. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr117.
42.
ReznekL. (2005) The 15-item test for malingering: A meta-analysis. Brain Injury19: 539–543. doi:10.1080/02699050400005242.
43.
RoblesL.LopezE.SalazarX.BooneK. B.GlaserD. F. (2015) Specificity data for the b Test, Dot Counting Test, Rey-15 Item plus recognition, and Rey Word Recognition Test in monolingual Spanish-speakers. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology37: 614–621. doi:10.1080/13803395.2015.1039961.
44.
RogersR. (1997) Introduction. In: RogersR. (ed.) Clinical assessment of malingering and deception, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press., pp. 1–19. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173056.001.
45.
SchretlenD.BrandtJ.KrafftL.Van GorpW. (1991) Some caveats using the Rey 15-Item Test to detect malingered amnesia. Psychological Assessment3: 667–672. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.3.4.667.
46.
SchroederR. W.Twumasi-AmbrakP.BaadeL. E.MarshallP. S. (2012) Reliable Digit Span: A systematic review and cross-validation study. Assessment19: 21–31. doi:10.1177/1073191111428764.
47.
SimonM. J. (1994) The use of the Rey Memory Test to assess malingering in criminal defendants. Journal of Clinical Psychology50: 913–917. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199411)50:6<913::AID-JCLP2270500616>3.0.CO;2-O.
48.
SpencerR. J.AxelrodB. N.DragL. L.Waldron-PerrineB.PangilinanP. H.BieliauskasL. A. (2013) WAIS-IV Reliable Digit Span is no more accurate than age corrected scaled scores as an indicator of invalid performance in a veteran sample undergoing evaluation for mTBI. The Clinical Neuropsychologist27: 1362–1372. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.845248.
49.
StimmelM.GreenD.BelfiB.KlaverJ. (2012) Exploring the accuracy and utility of the Rey Fifteen Item Test (RMT) with recognition trial in a forensic psychiatric population. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health11: 51–58. doi:10.1080/14999013.2012.676148.
50.
StraussE.SlickD. J.Levy-BenchetonJ.HunterM.MacDonaldS. W. S.HultschD. F. (2002) Intraindividual variability as an indicator of malingering in head injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology17: 423–444. doi:10.1093/arclin/17.5.423.
51.
StruttA. M.ScottB. M.ShresthaS.YorkM. K. (2011) The Rey 15-Item Memory Test and Spanish-speaking older adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist25: 1253–1265. doi:10.1080/arclin/17.5.423.
52.
Suhr, J., Tranel, D., Wefel, J., & Barrash, J. (1997). Memory performance after head injury: Contributions of malingering, litigation status, psychological factors, and medication use. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 19, 500–514. doi.org/10.1080/01688639708403740.
53.
TakedaM.NakayaM.KikuchiY.InoueS.KamataT. (2018) Clinical validity of the Japanese version of the WAIS-III short forms: Adaptations for patients with mild neurocognitive disorder and dementia. Asian Journal of Psychiatry31: 21–24. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2017.12.019.
54.
VickeryC. D.BerryD. T. R.InmanT. H.HarrisM. J.OreyS. A. (2001) Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: A meta-analytic review of selected procedures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology16: 45–73. doi:10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00058-X.
55.
Vilar-LopezR.Gomes-RioM.Caracuel-RomeroA.Llamas-ElviraJ.Perez-GarciaM. (2008) Use of specific malingering measures in a Spanish sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology30: 710–722. doi:10.1080/13803390701684562.
56.
WechslerD. (1981) WAIS-R manual, San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
57.
Wechsler, D. (1990). Japanese Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) (Shino, F., Kobayashi, S., Fujita, K., & Mackawa, H. Trans.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
58.
WechslerD. (2009) Advanced clinical solutions for the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV, San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
59.
ZenisekR.MillisS. R.BanksS. J.MillerJ. B. (2016) Prevalence of below-criterion Reliable Digit Span scores in a clinical sample of older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology31: 426–433. doi:10.1093/arclin/acw025.
