An experiment examined the impact of thinking about autobiographical group-related events (i.e., a past group inclusion experience or a past group exclusion experience) on recognition memory. After encountering the experimental manipulation, participants studied a list of words. Participants later engaged in two subsequent recognition tests: a group recognition test with a bogus confederate and a surprise individual recognition test. The memory measures were derived from signal detection theory and included hit rates, false alarm rates, and a memory discrimination index. Results showed that exposure to false information produced decreased hit rates, increased false alarms, and lowered discrimination values. Group-related thinking generally impaired recognition memory. These results are discussed in the context of prior research and in the context of theories of false memory.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin117: 497–529. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497.
2.
BetzA. L.SkowronskiJ. J.OstromT. M. (1996) Shared realities: Social influence and stimulus memory. Social Cognition14: 113–140. doi:10.1521/soco.1996.14.2.113.
3.
Carter-Sowell, A. R., Chen, Z., & Williams, K. D. (2008). Ostracism increases social susceptibility. Social Influence, 3, 143–153. doi:10.1080/15534510802204868.
4.
DeutschM.GerardH. (1955) A study of normative and informational influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology51: 621–629. doi:10.1037/h0046408.
5.
FriendlyM.FranklinP. E.HoffmanD.RubinD. C. (1982) The Toronto Word Pool: Norms of imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1080 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation14: 375–399. doi:10.3758/bf03203275.
6.
GardnerW. L.GabrielS.LeeA. Y. (1999) “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science10: 321–326. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00162.
7.
GentnerD.LoftusE. F. (1979) Integration of verbal and visual information as evidenced by distortions in picture memory. The American Journal of Psychology92: 363–375. doi:10.2307/1421930.
8.
GreenhouseS. W.GeisserS. (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika24: 95–112. doi:10.1007/bf02289823.
9.
HammersleyR.ReadJ. D. (1986) What is integration? Remembering a story and remembering false implications about the story. British Journal of Psychology77: 329–341. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02200.x.
10.
JarvisB. G. (2006a) MediaLab (Version 2006) [Computer Software], New York, NY: Empirisoft Corporation.
11.
JarvisB. G. (2006b) DirectRT (Version 2006) [Computer Software], New York, NY: Empirisoft Corporation.
12.
LalwaniA. K.ShavittS. (2009) The “Me” I claim to be: Cultural self-construal elicits self-presentational goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology97: 88–102. doi:10.1037/a0014100.
13.
LoftusE. F. (1975) Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology7: 560–572. doi:10.1017/0010-0285(75)90023-7.
14.
LoftusE. F. (2005) Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory12: 361–366. doi:10.1101/lm.94705.
15.
LoftusE. F.SchoolerJ. W.WagenaarW. A. (1985) The fate of memory: Comment on McCloskey and Zaragoza. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General114: 375–380. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.114.3.375.
16.
MacDonaldJ. A.SandryJ.RiceS. (2012) Self-construal priming affects speed of retrieval from short-term memory. PLoS One7(11): e50007. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050007.
17.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review98: 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
18.
McCloskeyM.ZaragozaM. (1985a) Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General114: 1–16. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.114.1.1.
19.
McCloskeyM.ZaragozaM. (1985b) Postevent information and memory: Reply to Loftus, Schooler, and Wagenaar. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General114: 381–387. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.114.1.1.
20.
NumbersK. T.MeadeM. L.PergaV. A. (2014) The influences of partner accuracy and partner memory ability on social false memories. Memory & Cognition42: 1225–1238. doi:10.35758/s13421-014-0443-9.
21.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin128: 3–72. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3.
22.
PettersonB.PatersonH. M. (2012) Culture and conformity: The effects of independent and interdependent self-construal on witness memory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law19: 735–744. doi:10.1080/13218719.2011.615821.
23.
PutnamA. L.SungkhasetteeV. W.RoedigerH. L. (2017) When misinformation improves memory: The effects of recollecting change. Psychological Science28: 36–46. doi:10.1177/0956797616672268.
24.
Reed, J., Wegener, D. T., Nairne, J. S., Wagner, M. F., & Skowronski, J. J. (2018). The effect of supporting information strength on false recognition in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott Paradigm: A persuasion theories approach (Unpublished manuscript).
25.
ReysenM. B. (2005) The effects of conformity on recognition judgements. Memory13: 87–94. doi:10.1080/09658210344000602.
26.
Roediger IIIH. L.MeadeM. L.BergmanE. T. (2001) Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review8: 365–371. doi:10.3758/BF03196174.
27.
SchacterD. L. (2001) The seven sins of memory: How the mind remembers and forgets, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
28.
SkagerbergE. M.WrightD. B. (2008) Manipulating power can affect memory conformity. Applied Cognitive Psychology22: 207–216. doi:10.1002/acp.1353.
29.
SmithV. L.EllsworthP. C. (1987) The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology72: 294–300. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.294.
30.
TverskyB.TuchinM. (1989) A reconciliation of the evidence on eyewitness testimony: Comments on McCloskey and Zaragoza. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118: 86–91. doi:10.1036//0096-3445.118.1.86.
31.
UnderwoodJ.PezdekK. (1998) Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review5: 449–453. doi:10.3758/bf03208820.
32.
Walters, R. H., Marshall, W. E., & Shooter, J. R. (1960). Anxiety, isolation, and susceptibility to social influence. Journal of Personality, 28, 518–529. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1960.tb01637.x.
33.
Walters, R. H., & Quinn, M. J. (1960). The effects of sensory and social deprivation on autokinetic judgments. Journal of Personality, 28, 210–220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1960.tb01614.x.
34.
WagnerM. F.SkowronskiJ. J. (2017) Social influence and mental routes to the production of authentic false memories and inauthentic false memories. Consciousness and Cognition51: 34–52. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.017.
35.
WeissR. F.BuchananW.PasamanickB. (1964) Social consensus in persuasive communication. Psychological Reports14: 95–98.
36.
Whittaker, J. O. (1964). Parameters of social influence in the autokinetic situation. Sociometry, 27, 88–95. doi:10.2307/2785805.
37.
WickensT. D. (2001) Signal detection theory, New York City, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
WrightD. B.LondonK.WaechterM. (2010) Social anxiety moderates memory conformity in adolescents. Applied Cognitive Psychology24: 1034–1045. doi:10.1002/acp.1604.
39.
ZaragozaM. S.McCloskeyM. (1989) Misleading postevent information and the memory impairment hypothesis: Comment on Belli and reply to Tversky and Tuchin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118: 92–99. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.92.
40.
Zwolinski, J. (2014). Does inclusion after ostracism influence the persistence of affective distress? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18, 282. doi:10.1037/gdn0000012.
