Researchers have operationalized working memory in different ways and although working memory–performance relationships are well documented, there has been relatively less attention devoted to determining whether seemingly similar measures yield comparable relations with performance outcomes. Our objective is to assess whether two working memory measures deploying the same processes but different item content yield different relations with two problem-solving criteria. Participants completed a computation-based working memory measure and a reading-based measure prior to performing a computerized simulation. Results reveal differential relations with one of the two criteria and support the notion that the two working memory measures tap working memory capacity and other cognitive abilities. One implication for theory development is that researchers should consider incorporating other cognitive abilities in their working memory models and that the selection of those abilities should correspond to the criterion of interest. One practical implication is that researchers and practitioners shouldn’t automatically assume that different phonological loop-based working memory scales are interchangeable.
AndersonJ. R. (1981) Cognitive skills and their acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
AndersonJ. R. (1995) Cognitive psychology and its implications, 4th ed. New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
AshcraftM. H.KrauseJ. A. (2007) Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14(2): 243–248.
6.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986) Working memory, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7.
BaddeleyA. (2000) The episodic buffer: A new component or working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences4(11): 417–423. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2.
8.
BaddeleyA. (2012) Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology63: 1–29.
9.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. (1974) Working memory. In: BowerG. H. (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 47–89.
10.
BaldoJ. V.BungeS. A.WilsonS. M.DronkersN. F. (2010) Is relational reasoning dependent on language? A voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study. Brain & Language113: 59–64.
11.
BaldoJ. V.DronkersN. F. (2007) Neural correlates of arithmetic and language comprehension: A common substrate?Neuropsychologia45: 229–235.
12.
BaldoJ. V.DronkersN. F.WilkinsD.LudyC.RaskinP.KimJ. (2005) Is problem solving dependent on language?Brain and Language92: 240–250.
13.
BanalesE.KohnenS.McArthurG. (2015) Can verbal working memory training improve reading?Cognitive Neuropsychology32(3–4): 104–132. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2015.1014331.
14.
BühnerM.KönigC. J.PickM.KrummS. (2006) Working memory dimensions as differential predictors of the speed and error aspect of multitasking performance. Human Performance19(3): 253–275.
15.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
16.
ColomR.Martinez-MolinaA.ShihP. C.SantacreuJ. (2010) Intelligence, working memory, and multitasking performance. Intelligence38(6): 543–551.
17.
ConwayA. R. A.KaneM. J.BuntingM. F.HambrickD. Z.WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (2005) Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review12(5): 769–786.
18.
CowanN. (2008) What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? In: SossinW. S.LacailleJ.-C.CastellucciV. F.BellevilleS. (eds) Progress in brain research, Vol. 169, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 323–338.
19.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior19: 450–466.
20.
DanemanM.GreenI. (1986) Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language25: 1–18.
21.
EmersonM. J.MiyakeA. (2003) The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language48: 148–168.
22.
EngleR. W.CarulloJ.CarulloJ. J. (1992) Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18: 972–992.
23.
Engel de AbreuP. M. J.GathercoleS. E. (2012) Executive and phonological processes in second-language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology104: 974–986. doi: 10.1037/a0028390.
24.
ErnstG. W.NewellA. (1969) GPS: A case study in generality and problem solving, New York, NY: Academic Press.
25.
FernyhoughC.FradleyE. (2005) Private speech on an executive task: Relations with task difficulty and task performance. Cognitive Development20: 103–120.
26.
FittsP. M.PosnerM. I. (1967) Human performance, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
27.
Hermer-VazquezL.SpelkeE. S.KatsnelsonA. S. (1999) Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology39: 3–36.
28.
HurlburtR. T.HeaveyC.KelseyJ. M. (2013) Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking. Consciousness and Cognition22: 1477–1494.
29.
JohnsonJ. W. (2000) A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research35(1): 1–19. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1.
30.
JohnsonJ. W.LeBretonJ. M. (2004) History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods7: 238–257.
31.
JurdenF. H. (1995) Individual differences in working memory and complex cognition. Journal of Educational Psychology87: 93–102.
32.
KyllonenP. C. (1993) Aptitude testing inspired by information processing: A test of the four-sources model. Journal of General Psychology120: 375–405.
33.
KyllonenP. C.ShuteV. J. (1989) A taxonomy of learning skills. In: AckermanP. L.SternbergR. J.GlaserR. (eds) Learning and individual differences: Advances in theory and research, New York, NY: Freeman, pp. 117–163.
34.
LangleyP.EmeryM.BarleyM.MacLellanC. J. (2013) An architecture for flexible problem solving. Advances in Cognitive Systems3: 1–18.
35.
LeshR.PostT.BehrM. (1987) Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In: JanvierC. (ed.) Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 33–40.
36.
LilienthalL.RoseN. S.TamezE.MyersonJ.HaleS. (2015) Individuals with low working memory spans show greater interference from irrelevant information because of poor source monitoring, not greater activation. Memory and Cognition43: 357–366.
37.
LogieR. H.BaddeleyA.ManeA.DonchinE.SheptakR. (1988) Working memory in the acquisition of cognitive skills. In: ColleyA. M.BeechJ. R. (eds) Cognition and action in skilled behaviour, North-Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 361–377.
38.
Lorenzo-SevaU.FerrandoP. J.ChicoE. (2010) Two SPSS programs for interpreting multiple regression results. Behavior Research Methods42(1): 29–35. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.29.
39.
MilradM. (2002) Using construction kits, modeling tools and system dynamics simulations to support collaborative discovery learning. Educational Technology & Society5(4): 76–87.
40.
OberauerK.SüßH. -. M.SchulzeR.WhilelmO.WittmanW. W. (2000) Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences29: 1017–1045.
41.
OberauerK.SüßH. -. M.WhilelmO.WittmanW. W. (2003) The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence31: 167–193.
42.
OrmrodJ. E.CochranK. F. (1988) Relationship of verbal ability and working memory to spelling achievement and learning to spell. Reading Research & Instruction28(1): 33–43.
43.
PerlowR.JattusoM.MooreD. (1997) Role of verbal working memory in complex skill acquisition. Human Performance10: 283–302.
44.
PerlowR.MooreD. D.KyleR.KillenT. (1999) Convergent evidence among content-specific versions of working memory tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement59: 866–877.
45.
Perrone-BertolottiM.RapinL.LachauxJ. -. P.BaciuM.LœvenbruckH. (2014) What is that little voice inside my head? Inner speech phenomenology, its role in cognitive performance, and its relation to self-monitoring. Behavioural Brain Research261: 220–239.
46.
SalthouseT. A. (1992) Influence of processing speed on adult age differences in working memory. Acta Psychologica79: 1–16.
47.
SalthouseT. A.BabcockR. L. (1991) Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology27: 763–776.
48.
ShuteV. J. (1991) Who is likely to acquire programming skills?Journal of Educational Computing Research7: 1–24.
49.
SimonH. A. (1978) Information processing theory of human problem solving. In: EstesW. K. (ed.) Handbook of learning and cognitive processes V, Hillsdale, NJ: LEA, pp. 271–295.
50.
SwansonH. L. (1992) Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology84: 473–488.
51.
SwansonH. L.OroscoM. J.LussierC. M.GerberM. M.Guzman-OrthD. A. (2011) The influence of working memory and phonological processing on English language learner children's bilingual reading and language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology103: 838–856. doi: 10.1037/a0024578.
52.
TonidandelS.LeBretonJ. M. (2011) Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology26: 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3.
53.
TurnerM. L.EngleR. W. (1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language28: 127–154.
54.
WelshJ. A.NixR. L.BlairC.BiermanK. L.NelsonK. E. (2010) The development of cognitive skills and gains in academic school readiness for children from low income families. Journal of Educational Psychology102: 43–53. doi: 10.1037/a0016738.
55.
WoltzD. J. (1988) An investigation of the role of working memory in procedural skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General117: 319–331.
