In the last few years, the popular press, judges, state attorneys general, and legal scholars have raised concerns about the frivolus nature of lawsuits filed in federal court by inmates in state and local custodies under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. An ethnographic content analysis of a random sample of 200 cases filed in 1994 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona demonstrates that the label “frivolous” is used in different ways by various stakeholders in the civil justice system. A typology of differing conceptualizations of frivolous cases is explored, and the sociolegal and public policy implications of the findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, R., Jr. (1993). Slamming the federal courthouse door on inmates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(2), 103-116.
2.
Allison v. Arizona Department of Corrections, Civ. 94-1942-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. filed Sept. 21, 1994).
3.
Alpert, G. P., & Huff, C. R. (1981, Summer). Prisoners, the law, and public policy: Planning for legal aid. New England Journal of Prison Law, 7, 307-340.
4.
Altheide, D. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Andenaes, J. (1974). Punishment and deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6.
Annual Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. (1967-1996). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
7.
Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977).
8.
Broomfield, R. C., & Weare, R. H. (1995). Annual report of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Phoenix: Privately printed by the United Staes District Court for the District of Arizona.
9.
Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 (1953).
10.
Burns, K. L. (1997, Spring). Return to hard time: The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Georgia Law Review, 31, 879-927.
11.
Cleavinger v. Saxner, 474 U.S. 193 (1985).
12.
Clute, P. D. (1980). The legal aspects of prisons and jails. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
13.
Cooper v. Pate, 382 F.2d 518 (7th Cir. 1967).
14.
Cotner v. Campbell, 618 F. Supp. 1091 (E.D. Okla. 1985). aff'd, in part, vacated in part, 795 F.2d 900 (10th Cir. 1986).
15.
Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344 (1986).
16.
DeFilippo v. Arpaio, Civ. 94-0311-PHX-RCB (D. Ariz. filed Feb. 9, 1994).
17.
Delaney v. Hotham, Civ. 94-0059-PHX-EHC (D. Ariz. filed Jan 6, 1994).
18.
Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25 (1992).
19.
Doumar, R. G. (1988, fall). Prisoners' civil rights suits: A pompous delusion. George Mason Law Review, 11, 1-30.
20.
Doumar, R. G. (1994). Prisoner cases: Feeding the monster in the judicial closet. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 14, 21-40.
21.
Eisenberg, H. B. (1993, spring). Rethinking prisoner civil rights cases and the provision of counsel. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 17, 417-490.
22.
Ellis v. Metalski, Civ. 94-1363-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. filed July 5, 1994).
23.
Ellison v. Arpaio, Civ. 94-1860-PHX-CAM (D. Ariz. filed Sept. 8, 1994).
24.
Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976).
25.
Ex Parte Hull, 312 U.S. 546 (1941).
26.
Federal Judicial Center. (1980). Recommended procedures for handling prisoner civil rights cases in the federal courts. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
27.
Fradella, H. F. (1997). Frivolous by any other name: An interdisciplinary analysis of Section 1983 prisoner civil rights cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
28.
Friedman, L. (1994). New developments in civil rights litigation and trends in Section 1983 actions. Practicing Law Institute's Litigation and Administrative Practice Course Handbook Series, 511(H4-5201), 575-821.
29.
Hager, P. (1995, May 15). Should inmates suit themselves? Prisoner filings, meritorious or not, increasingly burden federal judges and state lawyers. California Lawyer, pp. 33-35.
30.
Harrall, R. C. (1988). Prisoners' Section 1983 cases: A study of Palmigiano v. Garrahy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
31.
Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992).
32.
Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984).
33.
Irwin, J. (1985). The jail: Managing the underclass in American society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Jackson v. Arpaio, Civ. 94-1135-PHX-CAM (D. Ariz. filed June 7, 1994).
35.
Kuzinski, E. J. (1998, Winter). The end of the prison law firm? Frivolous inmate litigation, judicial oversight, and the prison litigation reform act of 1995. Rutgers Law Journal, 29, 361-399.
36.
Levy, T. I. (1993). Mandatory disclosure: A methodology for reducing the burden of pro se prisoner litigation. Albany Law Review, 57, 487-518.
37.
Maahs, J. R., & Del Carmen, R. V. (1995, December). Curtailing frivolous Section 1983 inmate litigation: Laws, practices, and proposals. Federal Probation, p. 53.
38.
Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961), overruled on other grounds by Monnell v. Dep't of Soc. Serv. of the City of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978).
39.
Moran, G. (1996, August 9). Cruel and unusual: Where does punishment end and cruelty begin?San Diego Union-Tribune, p. A1.
40.
Mueller, M. J. (1984). Abusive pro se plaintiffs in the federal courts: Proposals for judicial control. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 18, 93-114.
41.
Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989).
42.
O'Banion v. Arpaio, Civ. 94-0997-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. filed May 17, 1994).
43.
Ontiveros v. Harkins, Civ. 94-1108-PHX-RGS (D. Ariz. filed June 2, 1994).
44.
O'Shaugnessy, P. (1996, April 7). Con-job suits: New move to curb wacky prisoner claims. The New York Daily News, p. 18.
45.
Player v. Dinges, Civ. 94-1909-PHX-PGR (D. Ariz. filed Sept. 16, 1994).
46.
Polanice v. Arpaio, Civ. 94-0854-PHX-RCB (D. Ariz. filed Apr. 28, 1994).
47.
Possley, M. (1980, October 15). Inmates in and out: They sue. The Chicago Sun Times, p. 20.
48.
Powlas v. Arizona State Prison Complex Staff, Civ. 94-1538-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. filed July 26, 1994).
49.
Riewe, J. M. (1997). The least among us: Unconstitutional changes in prisoner litigation under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Duke Law Journal, 47, 117-160.
50.
Ross, D. L. (1995a, November). A twenty-year analysis of Section 1983 litigation in corrections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Boston.
51.
Ross, D. L. (1995b). A twenty-year analysis of Section 1983 litigation in corrections. American Jails, 9(2), 10-11, 13-16.
52.
Ruffin v. Commonwealth, 62 Va. 790 (1871).
53.
Sanders v. Gallegher, Civ. 94-0040-PHX-CAM (D. Ariz. filed Jan. 5, 1994).
54.
Shaffer v. Arpaio, Civ. 94-2279-PHX-RGS (D. Ariz. filed Nov. 10, 1994).
55.
Thomas, J. (1988). The paradox of the jailhouse lawyer. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
56.
Thomas, J., Aylward, A. M., Casey, M. L., Monton, D., Oldham, M., & Wheetley, G. (1985). Rethinking prisoner litigation: Some preliminary distinctions between habeas corpus & civil rights. The Prison Journal, 65(1), 83-106.
57.
Thompson v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Civ. 94-0054-PHX-PGR (D. Ariz. filed Jan. 6, 1994).
58.
Tompson v. Detention Bureau, Civ. 94-0032-PHX-PGR (D. Ariz. filed Jan. 4, 1994).
59.
Turner, W. B. (1979). When prisoners sue: A study of prisoner Section 1983 suits in the federal courts. Harvard Law Review, 92, 610-637.
60.
Tuzon v. Schmidt, Civ. 94-0045-PHX-PGR (D. Ariz. filed Jan. 5, 1994).
61.
United States Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Statistics. (1996). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
62.
Van Atta, D. (1996, April). The scandal of prisoner lawsuits. Reader's Digest, 65-70.
63.
Van Vort, M. (1987). Controlling and deterring frivolous in forma pauperis complaints. Fordham Law Review, 55, 1165-1176.
64.
Wallace, D. H. (1992). Ruffin v. Virginia and Slaves of the States: A nonexistent baseline of prisoners' rights jurisprudence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 333.
65.
Westling, W. T., & Rasmussen, P. (1985). Prisoners' access to the courts: Legal requirements and practical realities. Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal, 16, 273-317.
66.
Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294 (1991).
67.
Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974).
68.
Yoakum v. United States, Civ. 94-1987-PHX-PGR (D. Ariz. filed Feb. 27, 1994).
