There has been a growing concern about responding to violent young people within the prison setting. One of the dominant responses has been to “get tough” by introducing more authoritarian and militaristic regimes, but this strategy has become increasingly identified as being counterproductive and expensive. An alternative approach that is gaining ground, particularly in Canada and the United Kingdom, is the development of Cognitive Skills Programs, which are designed to encourage offenders to “think straight” and thereby to “go straight” and become more law abiding. Although these approaches have been subject to extensive evaluation, it is suggested that the forms of evaluation employed are flawed and that there are serious limitations to using recidivist rates as the principle measure of the success of these programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blud, L. (1996). Cognitive Skills Programs in prison. In S. Hayman (Ed.), What works with young prisoners?London: Institute for the Study and Treatment of Delinquency (ISTD).
2.
Currie, E. (1986). Confronting crime: An American challenge. New York: Pantheon.
3.
Fagan, F. (1990). Treatment and reintegration of violent offenders: Experimental results. Justice Quarterly, 7(2), 233-262.
4.
Genders, E., & Player, E. (1995). Grendon: A study of a therapeutic community. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
5.
Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4(3), 349-407.
6.
Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons For England and Wales. (1996). Feltham: Report of a full inspection. London: Home Office.
7.
Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons For England and Wales. (1997). Young prisoners: A the matic review by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for England and Wales. London: Home Office.
8.
Howard League. (1995). Banged up, beaten up and cutting up: Report of the Howard League Commission of Inquiry into violence in penal institutions for teenagers under 18. London: Author.
9.
Jones, P. (1996). Risk prediction in criminal justice. In A. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 33-69). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Little, M. (1990). Young men in prison. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
11.
Maltz, M. (1984). Recividism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
12.
Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 32, 22-45.
13.
Martinson, R. (1979). New findings, new views: A note of caution regarding sentencing reform. Hofstra Law Review, 7, 243-258.
14.
Matthews, R. (1987). Decarceration and social control: Fantasies and realities. In J. Lowman, R. Menzies, & T. Palys. (Eds.), Transcareeration: Essays in the sociology of social control (pp. 338-358). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
15.
McGuire, J., & Priestly, P. (1995). Reviewing what works: Past, present and future. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 3-35). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
16.
Morash, M., & Ricker, L. (1990). A critical look at the idea of boot camps as correctional reform. Crime & Delinquency, 36(2), 204-222.
17.
O'Donnell, L., & Edgar, K. (1996). Victimisation in prisons (Research findings No. 37). London: Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate.
18.
Palmer, T. (1975). Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 133-152.
19.
Palmer, T. (1992). The re-emergence of correctional intervention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation, London: Sage Ltd.
21.
Porporino, T., & Robinson, D. (1995). An evaluation of the reasoning and rehabilitation program with Canadian federal offenders. In R. Ross & R. Ross (Eds.), Thinking straight (pp. 29-46). Ottawa, Canada: Air Training Publications.
22.
Robinson, D. (1995). The impact of cognitive skills training on postrelease recidivism among Canadian federal prisoners. Ottawa, Canada: Ottawa Correctional Services.
23.
Ross, R., & Fabiano, E. (1985). Time To think: A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Science and the Arts.
24.
Sampson, A. (1994). Acts of abuse: Sex offenders and the criminal justice system. London: Routledge.
25.
Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach. London: Routledge.
26.
Sechrest, D. (1989). Prison boot camps do not measure up. Federal Probation, 63(3), 18-20.
27.
Shaw, S. (1985, summer). Reflections on short, sharp shock. Youth and Policy, 13, 1-15.
28.
Van Voorhis, P., Cullen, F., & Applegate, B. (1995, June). Evaluating interventions with violent offenders: A guide for practitioners and policymakers. Federal Probation, 59, 17-28.
29.
Wilson, J. Q. (1985). Thinking about crime (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage.
30.
Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1995). Incapacitation: Penal confinement and the restraint of crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
