Administrative Office of the U.S.Courts. Civil and Trials Statistical Tables, Twelve Month Periods (1961-1983)Washington, D.C., 1984.
2.
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts."Personal Communication."Washington, D.C., September 6, 1984.
3.
Allen, Karen M.; Schactman, Nathan A.; and Wilson, David R."Federal Habeas Corpus and Its Reform: An Empirical Assessment."Rutgers Law Journal13 (September 1982):675-772.
4.
Aylward, Anmarie, and Thomas, Jim."Quiescence in Women's Prison Litigation: Some Exploratory Issues."Justice Quarterly1(June 1984 ):253-276.
5.
Bailey, William S."The Realities of Prisoners' Cases Under 42 U.S.C. (Section) 1983: A Statistical Survey in the Northern District of Illinois."Loyola University Law Journal6( 1975): 527-559.
6.
Bator, Paul M."Finality in Criminal Law and Federal Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners."Harvard Law Review76(January 1963):441-528.
7.
Bronstein, Alvin, and Hirschkop, Philip J.Prisoners'Rights, 1979New York: Practicing Law Institute, 1979.
8.
Chicago Sun Times, 24 January 1983, p. 56.
9.
Chicago Tribune, 1 August 1984, p. 3.
10.
Cullen, Francis T.; Gilbert, Karen E.; and Cullen, John B."Legislator Ideology and Criminal Justice Policy: Implications from Illinois." In The Politics of Crime and Crim inal Justice, edited by E. Fairchild and V. Webb. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, forthcoming.
11.
. "Implementing Determinate Sentencing in Illinois : Conscience and Convenience."Criminal Justice Review 8(Spring 1983):1-16.
12.
Federal Judicial Center.Recommended Procedures for Handling Prisoner Civil Rights Cases in the Federal CourtsWashington, D.C., 1980.
13.
Friendly, Henry J."Is Innocence Irrelevant? Collateral Attack on Criminal Judgements."University of Chicago Law Review38(Fall 1970):142-172.
14.
Galanter, Marc."Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change."Law and Society Review9(Fall 1974):95-160.
15.
Hindess, Barry.The Use of Official Statistics in Sociology : A Critique of Positivism and EthnomethodologyLondon: Macmillan , 1973.
16.
Illinois Department of Corrections.Statistical Presentation, 1981Springfield, Ill.: Illinois Department of Corrections, Bureau of Policy Development, 1982.
17.
Jacobs, James.Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society.Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1977.
18.
Perspectives."Inmate Profile."Springfield, Ill.: Illinois Department of Corrections , 1984.
19.
Possley, Maurice."Inmates Using an Out - They Sue."Ch icago Sun Times , 15 October 1980, p. 20.
20.
"The Role of the Eighth Amendment."University of Chicago Law Review38(Spring 1971):647-664.
21.
Shapiro, David."Federal Habeas Corpus: A Study in Massachusetts."Harvard Law Review87(December 1973 ):321-372.
22.
Thomas, Jim."Law and Social Praxis: Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation and Structural Mediations." In Research in Law, Deviance and Social Control, vol. VI, edited by S. Spitzer and A. Scull. Greenwich, Conn.: Jai Press, 1984.
23.
Thomas, Jim, and Aylward, Anmarie."Trends in Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation: A Preliminary Overview," forthcoming.
24.
Thomas, Jim, et al."Demographic Trends in Prisoner Litigation: An Exploration."Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1984.
25.
U.S. Department of Justice.Sourcebook on Criminal Jnstice Statistics — 1979Washington, D.C. : National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, 1980. (a)
26.
Prisoners in State and Federal Institutions on December 31, 1980Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics , 1980. (b)