This study explored the relationship between prison food satisfaction and experienced severity of imprisonment (ESI). Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to verify distinct food satisfaction aspects, and regression analyses were estimated to examine their association with ESI. The findings revealed a negative relationship between food satisfaction and ESI, particularly for satisfaction with food choice and variety, highlighting food as a key domain through which incarcerated persons experience autonomy, dignity, and deprivation. Expanding food-related autonomy may help mitigate the burdens of imprisonment. Integrating food policy into wider institutional strategies may offer a promising avenue for promoting humane and rehabilitative correctional environments.
AndersenB. V.HyldigG. (2015). Food satisfaction: Integrating feelings before, during and after food intake. Food Quality and Preference, 43, 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.03.004
2.
AndersonC. N.CochranJ. C.MonetesA. N. (2023). How punitive is pretrial? Measuring the relative pains of pretrial detention. Punishment & Society, 26(5), 790–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745231218702
3.
AvieliH. (2023). Prisoners’ experience of health self-management: A qualitative study. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 55(5), 926–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12881
4.
BeavisS. G. (2004). Creating an open system in resource management: A study of waste minimisation in the prison system. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 11(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2004.10648608
5.
BeijersbergenK. A. (2016). Ontwikkeling van de leefklimaat vragenlijst penitentiaire inrichtingen [Development of the prison climate questionnaire penal institutions].
6.
BloreK. (2011). The right to adequate food and nutrition in Queensland prisons: From the prisoners’ mouth. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 16(2), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2011.11910889
7.
BooneM.AlthoffM.KoenraadtF. (2016). Het leefklimaat in justitiële inrichtingen [The prison climate in penal institutions]. Boom criminologie.
8.
BosmaA. Q.Van GinnekenE. F. J. C.PalmenH.PasmaA. J.BeijersbergenK. A.NieuwbeertaP. (2020). A new instrument to measure prison climate: The psychometric quality of the prison climate questionnaire. The Prison Journal, 100(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885520916819
9.
CardelloA. V. (1994). Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance. In MacFieH. J. H.ThomsonD. M. H. (Eds.), Measurement of Food Preferences (pp. 253–297). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6_10.
10.
CardelloA. V. (1996). The role of the human senses in food acceptance. In MeiselmanH. L.MacFieH. J. H. (Eds.), Food choice, acceptance and consumption (pp. 1–82). Blackie Academic & Professional. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1221-5_1
11.
CardelloA. V.SchutzH.SnowC.LesherL. (2000). Predictors of food acceptance, consumption and satisfaction in specific eating situations. Food Quality and Preference, 11(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00055-5
12.
ChatterjeeD.ChatterjeeS. C. (2018). Food in captivity: Experiences of women in Indian prisons. The Prison Journal, 98(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517743444
13.
ChenM. K.ShapiroJ. M. (2007). Do harsher prison conditions reduce recidivism? A discontinuity-based approach. American Law and Economics Review, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahm006
14.
CochranJ. C.MearsD. P.BalesW. D.StewartE. A. (2012). Does inmate behavior affect post-release offending? Investigating the misconduct-recidivism relationship among youth and adults. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 1044–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.736526
15.
CollicaK. (2010). Surviving incarceration: Two prison-based peer programs build communities of support for female offenders. Deviant Behavior, 31(4), 314–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620903004812
CondonL.HekG.HarrisF. (2008). Choosing health in prison: Prisoners’ views on making healthy choices in English prisons. Health Education Journal, 67(3), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896908094633
18.
CrankB. R.BrezinaT. (2013). Prison will either make ya or break ya: Punishment, deterrence, and the criminal lifestyle. Deviant Behavior, 34(10), 782–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.781439
19.
CrouchB. M. (1993). Is incarceration really worse? Analysis of offenders’ preferences for prison over probation. Justice Quarterly, 10(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829300091711
20.
De GraafK.KiltyJ. M. (2016). You are what you eat: Exploring the relationship between women, food, and incarceration. Punishment & Society, 18(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474515623103
21.
De HeideB. W. F.RamakersA. (2024). More than a matter of taste: A systematic review of qualitative literature on incarcerated persons’ subjective food needs [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Criminology, Leiden University.
22.
DragoF.GalbiatiR.VertovaP. (2011). Prison conditions and recidivism. American Law and Economics Review, 13(1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahq024
Gibson-LightM. (2018). Ramen politics: Informal money and logics of resistance in the contemporary American prison. Qualitative Sociology, 41(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-018-9376-0
GodderisR. (2006b). Food for thought: An analysis of power and identity in prison food narrative. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 50, 61–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41035612.
29.
GroeneveldA. E. A.VanhoucheA. S.NieuwbeertaP.PalmenH. (2025). Cell's kitchen: Normalization of foodplaces in Dutch penal institutions. The Prison Journal, 105(2), 174–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855241309111
30.
HarnerH. M.RileyS. (2013). Factors contributing to poor physical health in incarcerated women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 24(2), 788–801. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2013.0059
31.
HawleyG.HorwathC. C.GrayA.BradshawA.KatzerL.JoyceJ.O'BrianS. (2008). Sustainability of health and lifestyle improvements following a non-dieting randomised trial in overweight women. Preventive Medicine, 47(6), 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.08.008
32.
JohnsonC.GagnonS.GoguenP.LeBlancC. P. (2024). Prison food and the carceral experience: A systematic review. International Journal of Prison Health, 20(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPH-08-2023-0045
33.
KlineR. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). The Guilford Press.
34.
MaddenC.LeongS. L.GrayA.HorwathC. C. (2012). Eating in response to hunger and satiety signals is related to BMI in a nationwide sample of 1601 mid-age New Zealand women. Public Health Nutrition, 15(12), 2272–2279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980012000882
35.
MarucaA. T.DionK.ZuckerD.LozuchT. (2021). Significance of self-care management as persons prepare to reintegrate into the community. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 17(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000316
36.
MeđedovićJ.DrndarevićN.IlijićL. (2024). Unfavorable prison social climate links dark tetrad traits with self-reported institutional misconduct. Personality and Individual Differences, 227, Article 112707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112707
NieuwbeertaP.GroeneveldA. E. A.PalmenH.vanhoucheA. S. (2025). Veranderingen in de beleving van voeding in detentie, 2022–2024. Sancties, 19, 83–92.
39.
PageauF.CornazC. D.GothueyI.SeawardH.WangmoT.ElgerB. S. (2021). Prison unhealthy lifestyle and poor mental health of older persons – A qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article 690291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.690291
40.
RaaijmakersE. A. C.De KeijserJ. W.NieuwbeertaP.DirkzwagerA.ReefJ. (2014). De subjectieve zwaarte van detentie. Een Empirisch Onderzoek. Tijdschrift Voor Criminologie, 56(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.5553/TvC/0165182X2014056001004
41.
SariN. T. P.SunartiE. Y. (2024). A literature review: Unraveling the dimensions of food quality and its influence on consumer satisfaction. Brawijaya International Conference on Business Administration, Taxation, and Tourism, KnE Social Sciences, 453–467. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i11.15835
42.
SextonL. (2015). Penal subjectivities: Developing a theoretical framework for penal consciousness. Punishment & Society, 17(1), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514548790
43.
SmoyerA. B. (2014). Good and healthy: Foodways and construction of identity in a women’s prison. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 53(5), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12097
44.
SmoyerA. B. (2016). Making fatty girl cakes: Food and resistance in a women’s prison. The Prison Journal, 96(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515596520
45.
SmoyerA. B.BlankenshipK. M. (2014). Dealing food: Female drug users’ narratives about food in a prison place and implications for their health. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(3), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.013
46.
SmoyerA. B.LopesG. (2017). Hungry on the inside: Prison food as concrete and symbolic punishment in a women’s prison. Punishment & Society, 19(2), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516665605
47.
SnelsJ.SoethoudtH.KokM. (2018). Eten is om op te eten! Meten van voedselverspilling om zo te komen tot preventie van de kwaliteit van het voedsel voor de justitiabelen. https://edepot.wur.nl/532328.
48.
SpenceC.MotokiK.PetitO. (2022). Factors influencing the visual deliciousness / eye-appeal of food. Food Quality and Preference, 102, Article 104672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104672
Struthers MontfordK. (2023). The embodiment of contempt: Ontario provincial prison food. Social & Legal Studies, 32(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639221104253
51.
TuorilaH. (2007). Sensory perception as a basis of food acceptance and consumption. In MacFieH. J. H. (Ed.), Consumer-led food product development (pp. 34–59). Woodhead Publishing Limited.
52.
Van der VlistW. (2022). Een nieuw contract voor voeding justitiabelen [A new food contract for incarcerated individuals]. Sancties, 1, 24–29.
53.
Van der VlistW.VanhoucheA. S. (2022). Voedingsvragenlijst [Food Questionnaire]. Dutch Custodial Institutions Agency.
54.
Van GinnekenE. F. J. C.PalmenH.BosmaA. Q.NieuwbeertaP.BerghuisM. L. (2018). The life in custody study: The quality of prison life in Dutch prison regimes. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 4(4), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-07-2018-0020
VanhoucheA.-S.SmoyerA. B.MinkeL. K. (2018). Couscous in Tilburg prison: Food narratives and the quality of prison life in a Belgian-Dutch prison. Prison Service Journal (238), 3–9.
57.
WangmoT.HandtkeV.BretschneiderW.ElgerB. S. (2018). Improving the health of older prisoners: Nutrition and exercise in correctional institutions. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 24(4), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078345818793121
58.
WilliamsP.WaltonK.Hannan-JonesM. (2009). Prison foodservice in Australia – Systems, menus and inmate attitudes. Journal of Foodservice, 20(4), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00144.x
59.
WilsonA. (2023). Unpacking the prison food paradox: Formerly incarcerated individuals’ experience of food within federal prisons in Canada. Studies in Social Justice, 17(2), 280–305. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v17i2.4028
60.
Woods-BrownC.HuntK.SweetingH. (2023). Food and the prison environment: A meta-ethnography of global first-hand experiences of food, meals and eating in custody. Health & Justice, 11(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-023-00222-z
61.
Yasrebi-de KomF. M.DirkzwagerA. E.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2023). Deterrent effects of sanction severity and the role of procedural justice in prison: A preregistered randomized vignette experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 21(1), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09585-7
62.
Yasrebi-de KomF. M.DirkzwagerA. J. E.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2024). Antecedents of subjective severity of detention and perceived procedural justice. Psychology, Crime & Law, 30(8), 863–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2126471
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
