This study examines how detainment reshapes interpersonal relationships among Indonesian incarcerated youth. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) and interviews with six youth, four themes emerged: reconnecting with family, peer support in prison, staff as non-parental caregivers, and disengagement from out-of-prison peers. Detainment fostered emotional growth, trust in staff, and peer solidarity, while prompting withdrawal from risky past connections. These findings extend deprivation theory by highlighting the role of fair treatment and routine in mitigating the pains of imprisonment, with implications for relationship-centered rehabilitation focused on emotional support, prosocial networks, and family involvement.
AdamsB. L. (2018). Paternal incarceration and the family: Fifteen years in review. Sociology Compass, 12(3), e12567. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12567
BradyB.DolanP. (2020). The importance of being present: Mentors as “presence practitioners”. In Mentoring children and young people for social inclusion (pp. 16–31). Routledge.
4.
BronsonE. F. (2008). He ain’t my brother… he’s my friend’: Friendship in medium security prison. Critical Issues in Justice and Politics, 1(1), 63–74.
5.
BuiH. N.MorashM. (2010). The impact of network relationships, prison experiences, and internal transformation on women's success after prison release. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670903435381
6.
CalhounG. B. (2001). Differences between male and female juvenile offenders as measured by the BASC. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v33n02_06
7.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (2014). Trauma-informed care in behavioral health services (Treatment Improvement Protocol Series No. 57). Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207201/
8.
CesaroniC.Peterson-BadaliM. (2013). The importance of institutional culture to the adjustment of incarcerated youth and young adults. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55(4), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2012.es04
9.
CesaroniC.Peterson-BadaliM. (2016). The role of fairness in the adjustment of adolescent boys to pretrial detention. Prison Journal, 96(4), 534–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516650877
CreweB.LieblingA.HulleyS. (2015). Staff–prisoner relationships, staff professionalism, and the use of authority in public- and private-sector prisons. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12093
13.
De ClaireK.DixonL. (2016). The effects of prison visits from family members on prisoners’ well-being, prison rule breaking, and recidivism. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015603209
14.
DmitrievaJ.MonahanK. C.CauffmanE.SteinbergL. (2012). Arrested development: The effects of incarceration on the development of psychosocial maturity. Development and Psychopathology, 24(3), 1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579412000545
15.
DongesW. E. (2015). A qualitative case study: The lived educational experiences of former juvenile delinquents. The Qualitative Report, 20(7), 1009–1028. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2189
16.
DurdellaN. (2020). Articulating data analysis procedures. In Qualitative dissertation methodology: A guide for research design and methods (pp. 261–294). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506345147
17.
DuronJ. F.Williams-ButlerA.SchmidtA. T.ColonL. (2020). Mentors’ experiences of mentoring justice-involved adolescents: A narrative of developing cultural consciousness through connection. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(7), 2309–2325. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22415
18.
EmiraliA.O'RourkeR.FriendshipC. (2020). Desistance from absconding: “You’ve got to have hope”. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 22(4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-04-2020-0020
19.
FarinaA. S. J.HolzerK. J.DeLisiM.VaughnM. G. (2018). Childhood trauma and psychopathic features among juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(14), 4359–4380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18766491
20.
FlickU. (2018). Designing Qualitative Research (Book 1 of The SAGE Qualitative Research Kit (2nd ed.). Sage.
21.
FranklinC. S.CodyP. A.BallanM. (2019). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. In The handbook of social work research methods (pp. 355–374). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544364902.n19
22.
GarnerJ. (2016). A phenomenological examination of students’ lived experiences in a Type II alternative school (Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University). Digital Commons@Liberty University. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1161/
GoodenowC. (1992). School motivation, engagement, and sense of belonging among urban adolescent students. Critical Issues in Justice and Politics, 1(1), 73–90.
25.
HaighY. (2009). Desistance from crime: Reflections on the transitional experiences of young people with a history of offending. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260902775077
26.
HurdN. M.ZimmermanM. A.ReischlT. M. (2010). Role model behavior and youth violence: A study of positive and negative effects. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(2), 323–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610363160
27.
JäggiL.KliewerW. (2020). Reentry of incarcerated juveniles: Correctional education as a turning point across juvenile and adult facilities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(11), 1348–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820934139
28.
JangS. J.JohnsonB. R.HaysJ.HallettM.DuweG. (2019). Prisoners helping prisoners change: A study of inmate field ministers within Texas prisons. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(5), 470–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624(19872966
29.
JewkesY.ReisdorfB. C. (2016). A brave new world: The problems and opportunities presented by new media technologies in prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(5), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816654953
30.
KerleyK. R.CopesH. (2009). “Keepin’ my mind right”: Identity maintenance and religious social support in the prison context. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(2), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X07313391
31.
KohlerP.ReeseJ. (2008). JEDI: A new pathway to success for our forgotten youth. Education, 128(3), 507–514. ISSN: ISSN-0013-1172.
32.
KonaszewskiK.NiesiobędzkaM. (2022). Sense of coherence and ego-resiliency as predictors of maladaptive coping among Juveniles with different levels of delinquency. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66(16), 1862–1878. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211049198
33.
KreagerD. A.YoungJ. T.HaynieD. L.BouchardM.SchaeferD. R.ZajacG. (2017). Where “Old heads” prevail: Inmate hierarchy in a men’s prison unit. American Sociological Review, 82(4), 685–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417710462
34.
LangdridgeD. (2007). Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method. Pearson.
35.
LarkinM.ThompsonA. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In ThompsonA.HarperD. (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 99–116). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119973249
36.
LeakeV. S. (2006). Steps between, steps within: Adolescents and stepfamily belonging. University of Kentucky.
37.
LittleR. (2015). Putting education at the heart of custody? The views of children on education in a young offender institution. British Journal of Community Justice, 13(2), 27–46.
38.
LiuL.BachmanR. (2021). Self-identity and persistent offending: A quantitative test of identity theory of desistance. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 60(5), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2021.1931623
39.
MalterudK. (2016). Theory and interpretation in qualitative studies from general practice: Why and how?. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 44(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494815621181
40.
McCarthyD.AdamsM. (2019). Can family–prisoner relationships ever improve during incarceration? Examining the primary caregivers of incarcerated young men. British Journal of Criminology, 59(2), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy039
41.
McGrathK.ShawJ.FarquharsonL. (2020). Barriers to accessing psychological treatment for medium to high risk male young offenders. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 31(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2020.1782969
42.
MercerN.CrocettiE.BranjeS.Van LierP.MeeusW. (2017). Linking delinquency and personal identity formation across adolescence: Examining between- and within-person associations. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2182–2194. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000351
43.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Six common qualitative research designs. In Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
44.
MertlerC. A. (2017). Analyzing data. In Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (pp. 170–216). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483396484
45.
MillsA. J.DureposG.WiebeE. (eds.). (2012). Reflexivity. In Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 789–790). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397
46.
Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. (2025). SDP Publik: Sistem Database Pemasyarakatan [Public Correctional Database System]. Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia.Retrieved June 9, 2025, from https://sdppublik.ditjenpas.go.id/
47.
MooreK. E.SiebertS.BrownG.FeltonJ.JohnsonJ. E. (2021). Stressful life events among incarcerated women and men: Association with depression, loneliness, hopelessness, and suicidality. Health & Justice, 9(1), 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00140-y
48.
NurhaeniH.DinartiD.PrihartiD. (2016). The family parenting influenced adolescent brawls behavior. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i2.4531
49.
O’HalloranL.LittlewoodM.RichardsonD.TodD.NestiM. (2018). Doing descriptive phenomenological data collection in sport psychology research. Research Methodologies for Sport Scholarship, 21(2), 124–135.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429487521-9
50.
ParkerS.BascomJ.RabinovitzB.ZellnerD. (2008). Positive and negative hedonic contrast with musical stimuli. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.171
51.
PatelM.RyanA.HerreraS. (2021). Exploring friendship experiences among incarcerated and formerly incarcerated women: A qualitative interpretative meta-synthesis. Women & Criminal Justice, 32(4), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1885569
52.
PetrichD. M.PrattT. C.JonsonC. L.CullenF. T. (2021). Custodial sanctions and reoffending: A meta-analytic review. Crime and Justice, 50(1), 353–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/715100
53.
RhodesJ. E.GrossmanJ. B.ReschN. L. (2002). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’ academic adjustment. In Annual progress in child psychiatry and child development 2000-2001 (pp. 585–604). Routledge.
SaboV. (2017). Social relationships in young offenders: Relevance to peers, poverty, and psychological adjustment[Master’s thesis, The University of Western Ontario]. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4364/
56.
ScottT.BrownS. L. (2018). Risks, strengths, gender, and recidivism among justice-involved youth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(11), 931.
SofocleousA. (2023). A phenomenological study of interpersonal relationships in experiences of depression (Doctoral thesis, University of York). White Rose eTheses Online. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/34332/
60.
SouvereinF.MulderE.van DomburgL.AdriaanseM.PopmaA. (2022). Toward a tailored model of youth justice: A qualitative analysis of the factors associated with successful placement in a community-integrated facility. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66(2–3), 147–167. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0306624X20944689
61.
SterrettE. M.JonesD. J.McKeeL. G.KincaidC. (2011). Supportive non-parental adults and adolescent psychosocial functioning: using social support as a theoretical framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3–4), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9429-y
62.
SykesG. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton University Press.
63.
TadrosE.FyeJ. M.McCroneC. L.FinneyN. (2019). Incorporating multicultural couple and family therapy into incarcerated settings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(4), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0306624X18823442
64.
TascaM.MulveyP.RodriguezN. (2016). Families coming together in prison: An examination of visitation encounters. Punishment & Society, 18(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516642856
65.
VanhoorenS.LeijssenM.DezutterJ. (2017). Ten prisoners on a search for meaning: A qualitative study of loss and growth during incarceration. The Humanistic Psychologist, 45(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000055
66.
Van LangeP. A. M.BallietD. (2015). Interdependence theory. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.SimpsonJ. A.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA Handbook of personality and social psychology, vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 65–92). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-003
67.
VolkerB.FlapH.LindenbergS. (2016). Social capital and institutional success of prison inmates. Rationality and Society, 28(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463115611391
68.
WaiteS. (2022). Their ethos is all about building trust”: An exploration of staff-prisoner relationships at a women’s open prison [Doctoral thesis, Leeds Beckett University].
69.
WaiteS. (2023). “Their ethos is all about building trust”: An exploration of staff–prisoner relationships at a women’s open prison [Doctoral thesis, Leeds Beckett University]. Leeds Beckett University Research Data and Thesis Repository.
70.
WangM. C.ZhangX.GongJ.DengJ.LuoJ.GaoY.SalekinR. T. (2022). Variants of psychopathy in Chinese juvenile offenders: A latent profile analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(4), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211043149
71.
WilliamsI.WinshipG. (2018). Homeliness, hope and humour” ingredients for creating a therapeutic milieu in prisons. Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, 39(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/tc-05-2017-0015
72.
XuM.StorrG. (2015). Learning the concept of researcher as instrument in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(21), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1768
