Although pregnant incarcerated individuals are a highly vulnerable population, they are largely understudied. This study applies an exploratory qualitative content analysis approach and a Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) to examine the language in antishackling legislation. Through the lens of NPF, the research examines how three characters—pregnant incarcerated individuals, correctional officers, and medical staff—are portrayed in legislation, and how their broader criminal justice contexts help shape these narratives. The investigation provides insight into how the narrative components in antishackling legislation characterize pregnant incarcerated individuals, staff, and their criminal justice contexts.
AlirezaeiS.RoudsariR. L. (2022). The needs of incarcerated pregnant women: A systematic review of literature. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals), 10(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.30476/ijcbnm.2021.89508.1613
Arkansas State Legislature. (2019). House Bill 1523, 92nd general assembly, regular session. Arkansas State Legislature. https://legiscan.com/AR/text/HB1523/2019
6.
BeallS. K. (2018). Lock her up! How women have become the fastest-growing population in the American carceral state. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 23(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.15779/z38x34ms09
7.
BlumerH. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
CrowD. A.LawhonL. A.BerggrenJ.HudaJ.KoebeleE.KroepschA. (2017). A Narrative Policy Framework analysis of wildfire policy discussions in two Colorado communities. Politics & Policy, 45(4), 626–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12207
14.
CrowleyJ. E.WatsonM.WallerM. R. (2008). Understanding “power talk”: Language, public policy, and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 6(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592708080079
15.
Delaware State Legislature. (2022). House Bill 342, 151st General Assembly, 2021-2022 regular session. Delaware State Legislature. https://legis.delaware.gov/BillDetail/79248
EdwardsL.JamiesonS. K.BowmanJ.ChangS.NewtonJ.SullivanE. (2022). A systematic review of post-release programs for women exiting prison with substance-use disorders: Assessing current programs and weighing the evidence. Health & Justice, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00162-6
18.
FersztG. G.PalmerM.McGraneC. (2018). Where does your state stand on shackling of pregnant incarcerated women?Nursing for Women's Health, 22(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2017.12.005
GibbonsJ. (1996). Language and the law. Cambridge University Press.
21.
HeimerK.MaloneS. E.De CosterS. (2023). Trends in women’s incarceration rates in US prisons and jails: A tale of inequalities. Annual Review of Criminology, 6(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-041559
22.
HerreraJ.SchaibleL. (2023). When prosecution is declined: Factors influencing prosecutorial portrayal of officers involved in shootings. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 34(3), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034221150639
KelseyC. M.MedelN.MullinsC.DallaireD.ForestellC. (2017). An examination of care practices of pregnant women incarcerated in jail facilities in the United States. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21(6), 1260–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2224-5
25.
KramerC.ThomasK.PatilA.HayesC. M.SufrinC. B. (2022). Shackling and pregnancy care policies in US prisons and jails. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 27(1), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03526-y
26.
KrishnamoorthiM.MossA.KramerC.SufrinC. (2024). Anti-shackling laws. Advocacy and Research on Reproductive Wellness of Incarcerated People. https://arrwip.org/anti-shackling-laws/
O’DonovanK. T. (2018). Does the Narrative Policy Framework apply to local policy issues?Politics & Policy, 46(4), 532–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12265
RoddyA. L. (2023). Barriers and strategies to finding employment for substance-involved women leaving jail: A feminist analysis. Feminist Criminology, 18(4), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851231183733
38.
SaulsD. J. (2002). Effects of labor support on mothers, babies, and birth outcomes. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 31(6), 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217502239209
39.
ShanahanE. A.JonesM. D.McBethM. K. (2018). How to conduct a Narrative Policy Framework study. The Social Science Journal, 55(3), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2017.12.002
40.
SlaterL. (2023). Patterns and implications of language used in restrictive state abortion laws. ProQuest.
41.
South Carolina State Legislature. (2019). House Bill 3967, 123rd General Assembly, 2019-2020 regular session. South Carolina State Legislature. https://legiscan.com/SC/text/H3967/2019
42.
St. ClairR. (2008). Social scripts and the three theoretical approaches to culture. Intercultural Communication Studies, 17(4), 171–183.
43.
SufrinC.JonesR. K.MosherW. D.BealL. (2020). Pregnancy prevalence and outcomes in U.S. jails. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 135(5), 1177–1183. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003834
44.
SwayneV.WallT. (2024). Normalizing state rape: (In)voluntary consent and the body cavity search. Critical Criminology, 32(3), 803–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-024-09764-6
Werner-BierwischT.PinkertC.NiessenK.MetzingS.HellmersC. (2018). Mothers’ and fathers’ sense of security in the context of pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period: an integrative literature review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2096-3
