Higher Education in Prison (HEP) has expanded dramatically due to its success in effecting change in students, their families, and institutions. However, in demonstrating its effectiveness, research has lumped together a vast array of courses into a single construct of HEP. In this conceptual article, we encourage the discipline to think beyond this HEP monolith in order to capture and understand the variation that exists within HEP. We offer three ways to distinguish between HEP courses—by structure, student experience, and teaching practices. We argue that understanding how and why our courses achieve the positive outcomes requires systematic attention to teaching practices.
AmbroseS. A.BridgesM. W.DiPietroM.LovettM. C.NormanM. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BallD. L.SleepL.BoerstT. A.BassH. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1086/596996
4.
BarangerJ.RousseauD.MastrorilliM. E.MatesanzJ. (2018). Doing time wisely: The social and personal benefits of higher education in prison. The Prison Journal, 98(4), 490–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885518776380
BehanC. (2014). Learning to Escape: Prison education, rehabilitation and the potential for transformation. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 1(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.15845/jper.v1i1.594
7.
BehanC. (2021). Education in prison: A literature review. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
8.
BorregoM.HendersonC. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040
9.
BozickR.SteeleJ.DavisL.TurnerS. (2018). Does providing inmates with education improve postrelease outcomes? A meta-analysis of correctional education programs in the United States. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(3), 389–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9334-6
10.
BurroughsN.GardnerJ.LeeY.GuoS.TouitouI.JansenK.SchmidtW. (2019). Teaching for excellence and equity: Analyzing teacher characteristics, behaviors and student outcomes with TIMSS. Springer Nature.
11.
BushJ.GlickB.TaymansJ. (1997). Thinking for a change. National Institute of Corrections, United States Department of Justice.
12.
CabreraA. F.CrissmanJ. L.BernalE. M.NoraA.TerenziniP. T.PascarellaE. T. (2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students’ development and diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 43(1), 20–24.
13.
CastroE. L.Aguilar PadillaE.GaskillS. (2022). “Who can we get pell approved?”: Administrator perceptions and practices regarding which applicants can participate in second chance Pell. Research Collaborative on Higher Education in Prison.
14.
CastroE. L.GouldM. R. (2019). Higher education in prison: Thoughts on building a community of scholarship and practice. Critical Education, 10(13).
15.
CastroE. L.HunterR. K.HardisonT.Johnson-OjedaV. (2018). The landscape of postsecondary education in prison and the influence of second chance Pell: An analysis of transferability, credit-bearing status, and accreditation. The Prison Journal, 98(4), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885518776376
16.
ConwayP. F. (2022). Andragogy in prison: Higher education in prison and the tenets of adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 72(4), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136221100481
17.
CourtneyJ. A. (2019). The relationship between prison education programs and misconduct. Journal of Correctional Education, 70(3), 43–59.
18.
DanielA. E. (2007). Care of the mentally ill in prisons: Challenges and solutions. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 35(4), 406–410.
DelaneyR.SubramanianR.PatrickF. (2016). Making the grade: Developing quality postsecondary education programs in prison. Vera Institute of Justice.
21.
DuweG.ClarkV. (2014). The effects of prison-based educational programming on recidivism and employment. The Prison Journal, 94(4), 454–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885514548009
22.
EddyJ. M.MartinezC. R.BurrastonB. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of a parent management training program for incarcerated parents: Proximal impacts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(3), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12022
23.
EddyS. L.HoganK. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work?CBE–Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453–468.
24.
EvansD. (2018). The elevating connection of higher education in prison: An incarcerated student’s perspective. Critical Education, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v9i11.186318
25.
FreemanS.EddyS. L.McDonoughM.SmithM. K.OkoroaforN.JordtH.WenderothM. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
26.
GaskillS.CastroE.Aguilar PadillaE. (2022). “Why am I paying for this?”: Academic experiences of incarcerated students receiving second chance Pell at four institutions. Research Collaborative on Higher Education in Prison.
27.
GinsburgR. (Ed.) (2019). Critical perspectives on teaching in prison: Students and instructors on pedagogy behind the wall. Routledge.
28.
HammerD.ElbyA.ScherrR. E.RedishE. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp.89–119). Information Age Publishing.
29.
HardinJ.HaushalterK.YongD. (2020). Turning STEM education inside-out: Teaching and learning inside prisons. Science Education and Civic Engagement, 12(2), 84–90.
KnowlesM. S. (1984). Andragogy in action. Jossey-Bass.
34.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! the case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
35.
LarkeP. (2013). Culturally responsive teaching in higher education: What professors need to know. In Counterpoints, integrating multiculturalism into the curriculum: From the liberal arts to the sciences (Vol. 391, pp. 38–50.
36.
LeaC. H., IIICruméH. J.HillD. (2020). “Traditions are not for me”: Curriculum, alternative schools, and formerly incarcerated young black men’s academic success. Social Sciences, 9(12), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9120233
37.
LoCI and Wittenberg University Writing Group. (2016). An epistemology of incarceration: Constructing knowing on the inside. PhiloSOPHIA, 6(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/phi.2016.0005
38.
Malakki (R. Bolden). (2019). An open letter to prison educators. In GinsburgR. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on teaching in prison: Students and instructors on pedagogy behind the wall (pp. 17–18). Routledge.
39.
MarchettiE.NicholsonB. (2020). Using A culturally safe creative writing programme to empower and heal aboriginal and Torres strait islander men in prison. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 59(4), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12383
40.
McCorkelJ.DeFinaR. (2019). Beyond recidivism: The value of higher education in prison. Critical Education, 10(7).
41.
McGloinD. (2022). Epistemic injustice and college in prison: How liberal arts education strengthens epistemic agency. In Histories and philosophies of carceral education: Aims, contradictions, promises and problems (pp. 189–208). Springer International Publishing.
42.
MedinaJ.WhittM. S. (2021). Epistemic activism and the politics of credibility. In Making the case: Feminist and critical race philosophers engage case studies (pp. 293–324). State University of New York Press.
43.
MooreS.ErzenT. (2021). The relationship between liberal arts classroom experiences and the development of agency-related well-being for incarcerated students. Journal of Higher Education in Prison, 1(1), 30–49.
44.
O’SheaS. (2015). Arriving, surviving, and succeeding: First-in-family women and their experiences of transitioning into the first year of university. Journal of College Student Development, 56(5), 499–517. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2015.0053
45.
PelletierE.EvansD. (2019). Beyond recidivism. Journal of Correctional Education, 70(2), 49–68.
46.
PompocoA.WooldredgeJ.LugoM.SullivanC.LatessaE. J. (2017). Reducing inmate misconduct and prison returns with facility education programs. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(2), 515–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12290
47.
RalstonW. (2019). Schools, prisons, and higher education. In GinsburgR. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on teaching in prison: Students and instructors on pedagogy behind the wall (pp. 188–193). Routledge.
48.
RunellL. L. (2018). Arrested development: Pursuing a higher education in carceral contexts. The Prison Journal, 98(4), 470–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885518776379
49.
RussellX. (2019). Hope for leaving a legacy. In GinsburgR. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on teaching in prison: Students and instructors on pedagogy behind the wall (pp. 19–21). Routledge.
50.
SchusterS.StickleB. (2023). Are education programs in prison worth it? A meta-analysis of the highest-quality academic research. Policy Brief.
51.
StayhornT. L.SaddlerT. N. (2008). Gender differences in the influence of faculty-student mentoring relationships on satisfaction in college among African Americans. Journal of African American Studies, 13(4), 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-008-9082-1
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364
54.
Weil DavisS.MichaelsB. (2015). Ripping off some room for people to “breathe together:” peer-to-peer education in prison. Social Justice, 42(2), 146–158.
