Effects of Prison Security Level on the Violent Misconduct for New Federal Prison Entries

Abstract

This study investigated the independent effects of security level on rates of violent misconduct, and other forms of misconduct in Federal prison. With first-time federally incarcerated people, this study tested the effect of security level in a sharp intention-to-treat regression discontinuity to separate the effect from individual characteristics. Higher security was independently associated with higher rates of violent misconduct at medium (vs. low) and high (vs. medium) security. This study refers to this result as an “inflator effect.” Policy implications are discussed in the wake of the ban on Federal private prisons, and implications for risk assessment design are discussed.

Keywords

classification prisonization risk assessment prison prison violence endogeneity regression discontinuity security level‌

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adeleke

M. O.

Baio

O’Keeffe

G. A.

(2022). Regression discontinuity designs for time-to-event outcomes: An approach using accelerated failure time models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 185(3), 1216–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12812

Akers

R. L.

Jennings

W. G.

(2016). Social learning theory. In Piquero

A. R.

(Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 230–240). Wiley Blackwell.

Barrientos

Villa

J. M.

(2015). Antipoverty transfers and labour market outcomes: Regression discontinuity design findings. The Journal of Developmental Studies, 51(9), 1224–1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1010157

Berk

R. A.

de Leeuw

(1999). An evaluation of California’s inmate classification system using a generalized regression discontinuity design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10473857

Berk

R. A.

Ladd

Graziano

Baek

(2003). A randomized experiment testing inmate classification systems. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00121.x

Bernburg

J. G.

(2009). Labeling theory. In Krohn

Lizotte

Hall

(Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance: Handbooks of sociology and social research (pp. 187–207). Springer.

Bosma

A. Q. C.

van Ginneken

E. F.

Sentse

Palmen

(2020). Examining prisoner misconduct: A multilevel test using personal characteristics, prison climate, and prison environment. Crime & Delinquency, 66(4), 451–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719877347

Calonico

Cattaneo

M. D.

Titiunik

(2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295–2326. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11757

Camp

S. D.

Gaes

G. G.

(2005). Criminogenic effects of the prison environment on inmate behavior: Some experimental evidence. Crime and Delinquency, 51(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128704271471

10.

Chen

M. K.

Shapiro

J. M.

(2007). Do harsher prison conditions reduce recidivism? A discontinuity-based approach. American Law and Economics Review, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahm006

11.

Cho

Ghosh

(2021). Analysis of regression discontinuity designs using censored data. Journal of Statistical Research, 55(1), 225–248.

12.

Cook

T. D.

Shadish

Wong

(2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 724–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20375

13.

Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2006). Inmate Security Designation and Custody Classification (policy 5100.08). https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5100_008.pdf

14.

Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2017). Rated Capacities for Bureau Facilities (policy 1060.11, CN-1). https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/1060_011_cn-1.pdf

15.

Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2020). Inmate Discipline Program (policy 5270.09, CN-1). https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009_cn_1.pdf

16.

Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2023, June 13). Three Locations to Undergo Mission Changes. https://www.bop.gov/resources/news/20230613_locations_undergo_mission_changes.jsp

17.

Frandsen

B. R.

(2017). Party bias in union representation elections: Testing for manipulation in the regression discontinuity design when the running variable is discrete. In Cattaneo

M. D.

Escanciano

J. C.

(Eds.), Regression discontinuity designs: Theory and applications (pp. 281–315). Emerald Publishing Limited.

18.

Gaes

G. G.

Camp

S. D.

(2009). Unintended consequences: Experimental evidence for the criminogenic effect of prison security level placement on post-release recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-009-9070-z

19.

Harer

M. D.

Langan

N. P.

(2001). Gender differences in predictors of prison violence: Assessing the predictive validity of a risk classification system. Crime and Delinquency, 47(4), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128701047004002

20.

Kigerl

Hamilton

(2016). The impact of transfers between prisons on inmate misconduct: Testing importation, deprivation, and transfer theory models. The Prison Journal, 96(2), 232–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515618466

21.

Lee

D. S.

Lemieux

(2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281

22.

Matsueda

R. L.

(1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime & Delinquency, 34(3), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128788034003005

23.

Matsueda

R. L.

Anderson

(1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 36(2), 269–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01249.x

24.

Morris

R. G.

Carriaga

M. L.

Diamond

Piquero

N. L.

Piquero

A. R.

(2012). Does prison strain lead to prison misbehavior? An application of general strain theory to inmate misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.12.001

25.

Snyder

Schrepferman

Oeser

Patterson

G. R.

(2005). Deviancy training and association with deviant peers in young children: Occurrence and contribution to early-onset conduct problems. Development and Psychopathology, 17(2), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050194

26.

Steiner

Butler

H. D.

Ellison

J. M.

(2014). Causes and correlates of prison inmate misconduct: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.08.001

27.

Sutherland

E. H.

(1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Lippincott.

28.

Sykes

G. M.

(1958). The society of captives. Princeton University Press.

29.

Tahamont

(2019). The effect of facility security classification on serious rules violation reports in California prisons: A regression discontinuity design. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(4), 767–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09405-0

30.

Thornberry

T. P.

Lizotte

A. J.

Krohn

M. D.

Farnworth

Jang

S. J.

(1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(1), 47–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01146.x

31.

White House. (2021, January 26). Executive order on reforming our incarceration system to eliminate the use of privately operated criminal detention facilities. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/26/executive-order-reforming-our-incarceration-system-to-eliminate-the-use-of-privately-operated-criminal-detention-facilities/

32.

Zapotosky

. (2017, February 23). Justice Department will again use private prisons. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/justice-department-will-again-use-private-prisons/2017/02/23/da395d02-fa0e-11e6-be05-1a3817ac21a5_story.html