This study investigated the independent effects of security level on rates of violent misconduct, and other forms of misconduct in Federal prison. With first-time federally incarcerated people, this study tested the effect of security level in a sharp intention-to-treat regression discontinuity to separate the effect from individual characteristics. Higher security was independently associated with higher rates of violent misconduct at medium (vs. low) and high (vs. medium) security. This study refers to this result as an “inflator effect.” Policy implications are discussed in the wake of the ban on Federal private prisons, and implications for risk assessment design are discussed.
AdelekeM. O.BaioG.O’KeeffeG. A. (2022). Regression discontinuity designs for time-to-event outcomes: An approach using accelerated failure time models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 185(3), 1216–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12812
2.
AkersR. L.JenningsW. G. (2016). Social learning theory. In PiqueroA. R. (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 230–240). Wiley Blackwell.
3.
BarrientosA.VillaJ. M. (2015). Antipoverty transfers and labour market outcomes: Regression discontinuity design findings. The Journal of Developmental Studies, 51(9), 1224–1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1010157
4.
BerkR. A.de LeeuwJ. (1999). An evaluation of California’s inmate classification system using a generalized regression discontinuity design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10473857
BernburgJ. G. (2009). Labeling theory. In KrohnM.LizotteA.HallG. (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance: Handbooks of sociology and social research (pp. 187–207). Springer.
7.
BosmaA. Q. C.van GinnekenE. F.SentseM.PalmenH. (2020). Examining prisoner misconduct: A multilevel test using personal characteristics, prison climate, and prison environment. Crime & Delinquency, 66(4), 451–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719877347
CampS. D.GaesG. G. (2005). Criminogenic effects of the prison environment on inmate behavior: Some experimental evidence. Crime and Delinquency, 51(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128704271471
10.
ChenM. K.ShapiroJ. M. (2007). Do harsher prison conditions reduce recidivism? A discontinuity-based approach. American Law and Economics Review, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahm006
11.
ChoY.HuC.GhoshD. (2021). Analysis of regression discontinuity designs using censored data. Journal of Statistical Research, 55(1), 225–248.
12.
CookT. D.ShadishW.WongV. (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 724–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20375
FrandsenB. R. (2017). Party bias in union representation elections: Testing for manipulation in the regression discontinuity design when the running variable is discrete. In CattaneoM. D.EscancianoJ. C. (Eds.), Regression discontinuity designs: Theory and applications (pp. 281–315). Emerald Publishing Limited.
18.
GaesG. G.CampS. D. (2009). Unintended consequences: Experimental evidence for the criminogenic effect of prison security level placement on post-release recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-009-9070-z
19.
HarerM. D.LanganN. P. (2001). Gender differences in predictors of prison violence: Assessing the predictive validity of a risk classification system. Crime and Delinquency, 47(4), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128701047004002
20.
KigerlA.HamiltonZ. (2016). The impact of transfers between prisons on inmate misconduct: Testing importation, deprivation, and transfer theory models. The Prison Journal, 96(2), 232–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515618466
21.
LeeD. S.LemieuxT. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281
MorrisR. G.CarriagaM. L.DiamondB.PiqueroN. L.PiqueroA. R. (2012). Does prison strain lead to prison misbehavior? An application of general strain theory to inmate misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.12.001
25.
SnyderJ.SchrepfermanL.OeserJ.PattersonG. R. (2005). Deviancy training and association with deviant peers in young children: Occurrence and contribution to early-onset conduct problems. Development and Psychopathology, 17(2), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050194
26.
SteinerB.ButlerH. D.EllisonJ. M. (2014). Causes and correlates of prison inmate misconduct: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.08.001
27.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Lippincott.
28.
SykesG. M. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton University Press.
29.
TahamontS. (2019). The effect of facility security classification on serious rules violation reports in California prisons: A regression discontinuity design. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(4), 767–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09405-0
30.
ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.FarnworthM.JangS. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(1), 47–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01146.x
