Reentry involves a multifaceted reintegration process following incarceration, requiring social, psychological, and economic adjustments. This study examined the relationship between self-perceived employability and readiness for reentry among 384 prerelease inmates in six Sarawak prisons in Malaysia. Most participants were Malay males aged 25–29 years, with upper secondary education and multiple convictions, primarily for drug-related offences. Statistical analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between self-perceived employability and reentry readiness. These findings highlight the role of employability in successful reintegration and provide policymakers with place-based evidence to design tailored interventions aligned with Malaysia's commitment to sustainable development goal 16.
AhrensC. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3–4), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-006-9069-9
2.
AkhtarM. I. (2016, February 01). Research design. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2862445
AndrewsA. D. (2019). A phenomenological study addressing recidivism from the perspective of African American male ex-prisoners [Doctoral Dissertation]. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University.
5.
AndvigE.Koffeld-HamidaneS.AuslandL. H.KarlssonB. (2021). Inmates’ perceptions and experiences of how they were prepared for release from a Norwegian open prison. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 22(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578983X.2020.1847954
6.
BabbieE. R. (2012). The practice of social research (12th ed). Cengage Learning.
7.
BachmanR.KerrisonE.O’ConnellD.SmithL. (2016). Desistance from crime and identity: An empirical test with survival time. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(9), 1204–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816651905
8.
BarquínJ.CanoM. Á.CalvoM. D. L. Á. (2019). Treatment, reintegration, and quality of prison life: Perception by inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(13), 2291–2317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624(19851669
9.
Besin-MenglaM. M. (2020). Reintegration difficulties of ex-convicts: Reasons for recidivism of ex-convicts in Cameroon. African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 3(4), 10–24.
10.
ChuiW. H.ChengK. K. Y. (2013). The mark of an ex-prisoner: Perceived discrimination and self-stigma of young men after prison in Hong Kong. Deviant Behavior, 34(8), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.766532
11.
DeJordyR. (2008). Just passing through: Stigma, passing, and identity decoupling in the workplace. Group & Organization Management, 33(5), 504–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884241250349
12.
DoekhieJ.DirkzwagerA.NieuwbeertaP. (2017). Early attempts at desistance from crime: Prisoners’ pre-release expectations and their post release criminal behavior. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(7), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2017.1359223
GrommonE.RydbergJ. (2018). Desisters in the making? Exploring the capacity to desist during community transition among a small longitudinal panel of releasees. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2016.1228470
16.
GunawanW.CreedP.GlendonI. (2019). Development and initial validation of a perceived future employability scale for young adults. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(4), 610–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072718788645
17.
HaasS. M.HamiltonC. A. (2007). The use of core correctional practices in offender reentry: The delivery of transitional services and prisoner preparedness for release. Charleston.
18.
HardingD. J. (2003). Jean Valjean’s dilemma: The management of ex-convict identity in the search for employment. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 571–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/713840275
Heath-KellyC.ShanaahS. (2022). Rehabilitation within pre-crime interventions: The hybrid criminology of social crime prevention and countering violent extremism. Theoretical Criminology, 27(2), 183–203. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221108866 https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221108866
21.
IkeyiJ. (2021). Critical evaluation of the relevance of rehabilitation theory of reductivism to contemporary criminal justice system. International Journal of the Arts and Sciences, 4(3), 50–67. https://imtijotas.org.ng/index.php/about/article/view/22
22.
JacquesS. (2014). The quantitative-qualitative divide in criminology: A theory of ideas’ importance, attractiveness, and publication. Theoretical Criminology, 18(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613519467
23.
JonesA. N. (2011). Disclosure of mental illness in the workplace: A literature review. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 14(3), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2011.598101
24.
KrejcieR. V.MorganD. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164470030003
25.
LaubJ. H.Sampson RJ. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Harvard University Press.
26.
MalmqvistJ.HellbergK.MöllåsG.RoseR.ShevlinM. (2019). Conducting the pilot study: A neglected part of the research process? Methodological findings supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative research studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919878341
MathlinG.FreestoneM.JonesH. (2024). Factors associated with successful reintegration for male prisoners: A systematic narrative review with implicit causal model. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 20, 541–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-022-09547-5
31.
McCombesS. (2021, March 22). Developing strong research questions: Criteria and examples.
32.
NeeC.VernhamZ. (2017). Expertise and its contribution to the notion of protective factors in offender rehabilitation and desistance. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.12.004
33.
PaternosterR.BachmanR.KerrisonE.O’ConnellD.SmithL. (2016). Desistance from crime and identity: An empirical test with survival time. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(9), 1204–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816651905
34.
QasimM.WebsterC. (2020). Prisons were made for people like us: British Pakistani Muslim experiences upon release from prison. The Prison Journal, 100(3), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885520916880
35.
RhodenN.SenkerS.GlorneyE. (2021). A qualitative exploration of the role of employment in desistance and subsequent identity change—Ex-prisoners’ lived experiences. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 24(2), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-11-2021-0055
RollinsA. L.MueserK. T.BondG. R.BeckerD. R. (2002). Social relationships at work: Does the employment model make a difference?Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479
38.
RosliM. R. B. M.AnuarM. A. M.HamzahS. R. (2021). Exploring prison rehabilitation programs and the factors that contributed to former prisoners’ career success. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(12), 1709–1731. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i12/11900
39.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/652208
40.
SandbuktI. J. (2021). Reentry in practice: Sexual offending, self-narratives, and the implications of stigma in Norway. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(9), 930–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211049184
41.
SanthoshR.MathewE. (2021). Social reintegration of released prisoners: An empirical analysis from two Indian states. International Annals of Criminology, 59(2), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2021.18
42.
SmallM. L. (2009). How many cases do I need: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586
43.
TarwackiP. (2021). Legal and axiological basis for social reintegration of persons sentenced to imprisonment and public participation in the process. Internal Security, 13(2), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6531
44.
TharshiniN. K.IbrahimF.KamaluddinM. R.RathakrishnanB.Che Mohd NasirN. (2021a). The link between individual personality traits and criminality: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8663. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168663
45.
TharshiniN. K.IbrahimF.MohamadM. S.ZakariaE. (2021b). The influence of self-concept, sense of community and social support towards social integration among young offenders in Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia, 39(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2021.39.1.6
46.
TharshiniN. K.WongS. W.Haji Mas’udF.AliK.AhmadN. A. (2024). Readiness for re-entry among pre-release prisoners in Sarawak, Malaysia. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 26(3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-10-2023-0049
47.
VignanskyE.AddadM.HimiH. (2018). Despair will hold you prisoner, hope will set you free: Hope and meaning among released prisoners. The Prison Journal, 98(3), 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885518764920
48.
WardT.BrownM. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001662744
49.
YoungR. (2016). Do, returning home: Reintegration after prison or jail. Social Work, 61(3), 278–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/sww029
