Predicting Prison Misconduct With the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

A meta-analysis of six prison samples using the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) general criminal thinking, proactive criminal thinking, and reactive criminal thinking scales to predict disciplinary infractions was performed. Results showed evidence of significant associations between all three PICTS scales and prison misconduct, whereas the magnitude of effect ranged from small (all infractions) to very small (interpersonal aggression infractions). Although there were no signs of heterogeneity in the results, sex, race, and length of follow up served as moderators. The apparent contradiction of moderator effects in a meta-analysis with no evidence of heterogeneity is discussed.

Keywords

meta-analysis criminal thinking prison disciplinary infractions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett

Farrington

D. P.

Huesmann

L. R.

(2005). Explaining gender differences in crime and violence: The importance of social cognitive skills. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(3), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2004.07.001

Bonta

Andrews

(2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.

Borenstein

Hedges

L. V.

Higgins

J. P.

Rothstein

H. R.

(2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 2) [computer software]. Biostat.

Brazão

Rijo

Céu Salvador

M. D.

Pinto-Gouveia

(2018). Promoting emotion and behavior regulation in male prison inmates: A secondary data analysis from a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of the growing pro-social program. Law and Human Behavior, 42(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000267

Cihan

Reidy

Sorensen

Chism

K. A.

(2020). Assessing the developmental patterns on prison misconduct: Do visitation patterns matter? Criminal Justice Studies, 33(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2019.1692009

Clark

Rydberg

(2016). The effect of institutional educational programming on prison misconduct. Criminal Justice Studies, 29(4), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2016.1229770

Clear

T. R.

Sumter

M. T.

(2002). Prisoners, prison, and religion: Religion and adjustment to prison. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35(3–4), 125–156. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v35n03_07

Cochran

J. C.

Mears

D. P.

(2017). The path of least desistance: Inmate compliance and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 34(3), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1168476

Cochran

J. C.

Mears

D. P.

Bales

W. D.

Stewart

E. A.

(2014). Does inmate behavior affect post-release offending? Investigating the misconduct-recidivism relationship among youth and adults. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 1044–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.736526

10.

Courtney

J. A.

(2019). The relationship between prison education programs and misconduct. Journal of Correctional Education, 70(3), 43–59.

11.

Duval

S. J.

Tweedie

R. L.

(2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x

12.

Duwe

McNeeley

(2020). The effects of prison labor on institutional misconduct, post prison employment, and recidivism. Corrections, Policy, Practice and Research, 5(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1416317

13.

Egger

Davey

S. G.

Schneider

Minder

(1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

14.

Fergusson

D. M.

Lynskey

M. T.

(1998). Conduct problems in childhood and psychosocial outcomes in young adulthood: A prospective study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342669800600101

15.

*Folk

J. B.

Disabato

D. J.

Daylor

J. M.

Tangney

J. P.

Barboza

Wilson

J. S.

Bonieskie

Holwager

(2016). Effectiveness of a self-administered intervention for criminal thinking: Taking a chance on change. Psychological Services, 13(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000079

16.

French

S. A.

Gendreau

(2006). Reducing prison misconducts: What works!. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(2), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854805284406

17.

Gendreau

Grant

B. A.

Leipciger

Collins

(1979). Norms and recidivism rates for the MMPI and selected experimental scales on a Canadian delinquent sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 11(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081569

18.

Gonçalves

L. C.

Gonçalves

R. A.

Martins

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

(2014). Predicting infractions and health care utilization in prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(8), 921–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814524402

19.

Gover

A. R.

Pérez

D. M.

Jennings

W. G.

(2008). Gender differences in factors contributing to institutional misconduct. The Prison Journal, 88(3), 378–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885508322453

20.

Griffin

V. W.

Lee

G. M.

Vito

A. G.

Walker

J. T.

(2019). It’s not so black and white: A conjunctive analysis of racial differences in incidents of prison misconduct. Corrections, Policy, Practice and Research, 4(2), 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1390798

21.

Higgins

J. P. T.

Thompson

S. G.

(2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186

22.

Hirschi

Gottfredson

(1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 552–584. https://doi.org/10.1086/227905

23.

Irwin

Cressey

D. R.

(1962). Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/799047

24.

Konkel

R. H.

Daquin

J. C.

(2023). From the streets to prison and back: An examination of continuity of behaviors among offenders. Corrections, 8(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2020.1808116

25.

Lantz

Wenger

M. R.

(2020). The co-offender as counterfactual; a quasi-experimental within-partnership approach to the examination of the relationship between race and arrest. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09362-5

26.

Lloyd

C. D.

Hanby

L. J.

Serin

R. C.

(2014). Rehabilitation group coparticipants’ risk levels are associated with offenders’ treatment performance, treatment change, and recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035360

27.

MacKenzie

D. L.

Goodstein

L. I.

Blouin

D. C.

(1987). Personal control and prisoner adjustment: An empirical test of a proposed model. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427887024001004

28.

Morgan

R. D.

Flora

D. B.

(2002). Group psychotherapy with incarcerated offenders: A research synthesis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(3), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.3.203

29.

Pierce

M. B.

Freiburger

T. L.

Chapin

J. R.

Epling

Madden

T. J.

(2018). Assessing the impact of visitation on inmate misconduct within a county jail. Security Journal, 31, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-016-0086-6

30.

Reidy

T. J.

Sorensen

J. R.

Cunningham

M. D.

(2012). Community violence to prison assault: A test of the behavioral continuity hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 36(4), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093934

31.

Rice

M. E.

Harris

G. T.

(2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7

32.

Schaefer

Sams

Lux

(2016). Saved, salvaged, or sunk: A meta-analysis of the effects of faith-based interventions on inmate adjustment. Prison Journal, 96(4), 600–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516650883

33.

Sorensen

Davis

(2011). Violent criminals locked up: Examining the effect of incarceration on behavioral continuity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.01.003

34.

Sutherland

E. H.

(1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). J.B. Lippincott.

35.

Tewksbury

Connor

D. P.

Denney

A. S.

(2014). Disciplinary infractions behind bars: An exploration of importation and deprivation theories. Criminal Justice Review, 39(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016814529965

36.

Thornberry

T. P.

Freeman-Gallant

Lizotte

A. J.

Krohn

M. D.

Smith

C. A.

(2003). Linked lives: The intergenerational transmission of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022574208366

37.

Valentine

C. L.

Mears

D. P.

Bales

W. D.

(2015). Unpacking the relationship between age and prison misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(5), 418–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.05.001

38.

Walters

G. D.

(1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854895022003008

39.

*Walters

G. D.

(1996). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part III. Predictive validity. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X96402003

40.

Walters

G. D.

(2006). Proactive and reactive composite scales for the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42(4), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v42n04_02

41.

*Walters

G. D.

(2007). Predicting institutional adjustment with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles composite scales: Replication and extension. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532505X83587

42.

Walters

G. D.

(2012). Criminal thinking and recidivism: Meta-analytic evidence on the predictive and incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(3), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.010

43.

*Walters

G. D.

(2015). Criminal thinking as a predictor of prison misconduct and mediator of the static risk–infractions relationship. Prison Journal, 95(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515587468

44.

Walters

G. D.

(2017). Effect of a brief cognitive behavioural intervention on criminal thinking and prison misconduct in male inmates: Variable-oriented and person-oriented analyses. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 27(5), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2028

45.

Walters

G. D.

(2022). Criminality and crime: A social-cognitive-developmental theory of delinquent and criminal behavior. Lexington Books.

46.

Walters

G. D.

Crawford

(2013). In and out of prison: Do importation factors predict all forms of misconduct or just the more serious ones? Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.08.001

47.

*Walters

G. D.

Elliott

W. N.

(1999). Predicting release and disciplinary outcome with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Female data. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532599167743

48.

*Walters

G. D.

Geyer

M. D.

(2005). Construct validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles in relationship to the PAI, disciplinary adjustment, and program completion. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_04