Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The current study is one of few to utilize a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effects of a Day Reporting Center (DRC). Individuals on community supervision were randomly assigned to the DRC group or the control group. Path models examined the direct and indirect effects of DRC participation on social outcomes, revocations, and violations. Findings suggest that DRCs might effectively achieve their goals, at least in the short term and for some types of individuals. While these findings suggest that DRCs can be effective, more research is needed before definitive policy implications can be made.

Keywords

day reporting centers community corrections community supervision intermediate sanctions probation and parole

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bahn

Davis

(1998). Day reporting centers as an alternative to incarceration. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 27(3–4), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v27n03_10

Baird

Heinz

Bemus

(1979). The Wisconsin case classification/staff deployment project. Wisconsin Department of Corrections.

Bauer

D. J.

Preacher

K. J.

Gil

K. M.

(2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.142

Bloom

Owen

Covington

(2003). Gender responsive strategies: research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. National Institute of Corrections.

Bogue

Woodward

Campbell

N. M.

Clawson

Faust

(2004). Implementing evidence-based practice in community corrections: the principles of effective intervention. Crime and Justice Institute, Department of Justice. https://s3.amazonaws.com/static.nicic.gov/Library/019342.pdf

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed). Anderson.

Boyle

D. J.

Ragusa-Salerno

Lanterman

J. L.

Marcus

A. F.

(2013). Overview of: ‘an evaluation of day reporting centers for parolees: outcomes of a randomized trial’. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(1), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12011

Caputo

(2004). Intermediate sanctions in corrections. University of North Texas Press.

Champion

Harvey

Schanz

(2011). Day reporting center and recidivism: comparing offender groups in a western Pennsylvania county study. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(7), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2011.583718

10.

Chen

Cohen

Chen

(2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation®, 39(4), 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610911003650383

11.

Connolly

M. M.

(2003). Critical examination of actuarial offender-based prediction assessments: Guidance for the next generation of assessment(Publication No. 3116348) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

12.

Council of State Governments Justice Center (2019). Confined and costly: How supervision violations are filling prisons and burdening budgets. https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/confined-and-costly.pdf.

13.

Craddock

(2000). Exploratory analysis of client outcomes, costs, and benefits of day reporting centers (Report No. 182365). National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/exploratory-analysis-client-outcomes-costs-and-benefits-day-reporting-centers.

14.

Ferguson

L. M.

Wormith

J. S.

(2013). A meta-analysis of moral reconation therapy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(9), 1076–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12447771

15.

Hardyman

P. L.

Van Voorhis

(2004). Developing gender-specific classification systems for women offenders. National Institute of Corrections. https://nicic.gov/developing-gender-specific-classification-systems-women-offenders.

16.

Henderson

Miller

H. A.

(2011). The (twice) failure of the Wisconsin risk need assessment in a sample of probationers. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403411422410

17.

Hyatt

Ostermann

(2019). Better to stay home: evaluating the impact of day reporting centers on offending. Crime and Delinquency, 65(1), 94–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717727739

18.

Kyckelhan

(2012). State corrections expenditures (1982-2010) (Report No. 239672). Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/scefy8210.pdf.

19.

Lanterman

J. L.

(2020). A multi-state survey of day reporting center models. Criminal Justice Studies, 33(2), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2019.1684275

20.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Lockwood

C. M.

Williams

(2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4

21.

Mai

Subramanian

(2017). The price of prisons: examining state spending trends, 2010-2015. Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.vera.org/publications/price-of-prisons-2015-state-spending-trends/price-of-prisons-2015-state-spending-trends/price-of-prisons-2015-state-spending-trends-population-and-spending

22.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th edition). Muthén&Muthén.

23.

National Institute of Corrections (2004). Implementing evidence-based practice in community corrections: the principles of effective intervention. Department of Justice. https://s3.amazonaws.com/static.nicic.gov/Library/019342.pdf

24.

National Institute of Justice (n.d.). Recidivism. Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/corrections/recidivism

25.

Nevada, D. P. S. (2016). Parole and probation division directive manual: probation success probability score and selection recommendation scale. Nevada Department of Public Safety.

26.

Nevada Legislature (2019). Minutes of the meeting of the assembly committee on judiciary- eightieth session. https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/80th2019/Minutes/Assembly/JUD/Final/105.pdf .

27.

NIJ (2020). Practice profile: Day reporting centers. Crime Solutions, National Institute of Justice. https://crimesolutions.gov/PracticeDetails.aspx?ID = 97&utm_source = govdelivery&utm_medium = email&utm_campaign = csreleases.

28.

Parent

Byrne

Tsarfaty

Valade

Esselman

(1995). Day reporting centers (vol. 1) (Report No. 155060). National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/155060NCJRS.pdf.

29.

Rhyne

Hamblin

(2010). Multnomah county day reporting center evaluation. Multnomah County Department of Community Justice.

30.

Rindels

(2021, February 5). Day Reporting Centers, an alternative to incarcerations for parolees, quietly scrapped. TheNevada Independent. https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/day-reporting-centers-an-alternative-to-incarceration-for-parolees-quietly-scrapped-in-nevada.

31.

Salisbury

E. J.

(2019). Actuarial malpractice and responsible risk assessment. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA.

32.

Salisbury

E. J.

Van Voorhis

(2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationer’s paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 541–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809334076

33.

Sawyer

Wagner

(2020). Mass incarceration: The whole pie in 2020. The Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2020.html.

34.

Skeem

Monahan

Lowenkamp

(2016). Gender, risk assessment, and sanctioning: the cost of treating women like men. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000206

35.

Steiner

Butler

(2013). Why didn’t they work? Thoughts on the application of New Jersey day reporting centers. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12014

36.

West

M. P.

Belisle

Sousa

W. H.

(2019). Nevada’s day reporting center: results from a randomized controlled trial. Center for Crime and Justice Policy, University of Nevada Las Vegas. https://www.unlv.edu/sites/default/files/page_files/27/CCJP-RIB_DRC.pdf

37.

Wong

J. S.

Bouchard

Lee

Gushue

(2019). Examining the effects of day reporting centers on recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58(3), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2019.1583300

38.

Wood

(2019). Nevada Department of Public Safety Division of Parole and Probation: Overview 2019 (Exhibit C). Submitted to the Assembly Committee Judiciary. https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/80th2019/Exhibits/Assembly/JUD/AJUD105C.pdf.

39.

Wright

K. N.

Clear

T. R.

Dickson

(1984). Universal applicability of probation risk-assessment instrument. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00291.x

40.

Yacus

G. M.

(1998). Validation of the risk and needs assessment used in the classification for parole and probation of Virginia’s adult criminal offenders (Publication No. 9921785) [Doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

What Really Happens in Vegas?: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of Nevada's First Day Reporting Center

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References