The purpose of the current study was to determine whether a change in criminal thinking or a change in perceived certainty mediates the putative criminogenic effect of incarceration. A path analysis of 1,170 male delinquents revealed that incarceration prior to age 19 produced a negative rather than positive effect on offending behavior at age 20, although it did predict an increase in proactive criminal thinking (PCT) from age 18 to age 19. PCT, in turn, predicted a rise in past year offending. Perceived certainty of punishment, on the other hand, failed to mediate the effect of incarceration on future offending.
AkersR. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.
2.
AllisonP. D. (2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. In SAS global forum 2012 (Paper 312-2012). SAS Institute.
3.
BalesW. D.PiqueroA. R. (2012). Assessing the impact of imprisonment on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(1), 71–101.
4.
BanduraA.BarbarnelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.
5.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
6.
BeccariaC. (1986). On crimes and punishments (YoungD., Trans.). Hackett. (Original work published 1764).
7.
BhatiA. S.PiqueroA. R. (2007). Estimating the impact of incarceration on subsequent offending trajectories: Deterrent, criminogenic, or null effects. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98, 207–253.
8.
CaudyM. S.TillyerM. S.TillyerR. (2018). Jail versus probation: A gender-specific test of differential effectiveness and moderators of sanction effects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(7), 949–968.
9.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577.
10.
CollinsL. M.SchaferJ. L.KamC. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351.
11.
ElwertF.WinshipC. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.
12.
FeuchtT.HoltT. (2016). Does cognitive behavioral therapy work in criminal justice? A new analysis from CrimeSolutions.gov. NIJ Journal, 277, 10–17.
13.
HardingD. J.MorenoffJ. D.NguyenA. P.BushwayS. D. (2017). Short- and long-term effects of imprisonment on future felony convictions and prison admissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(42), 11103–11108.
14.
HarrisH. M. (2015, November). Do cellmates matter? A study of prison peer effects under essential heterogeneity (NCJRS final report). U.S. Department of Justice.
15.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.
16.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.
17.
HuizingaD.EsbensenF.WeiharA. (1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 83–118.
18.
ImaiK.KeeleL.TingleyD. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334.
KolstadA. (1996). Imprisonment as rehabilitation: Offenders’ assessment of why it does not work. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(4), 323–335.
21.
LandenbergerN. A.LipseyM. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451–476.
22.
MacKenzieD. L.BierieD.MitchellO. (2007). An experimental study of a therapeutic boot camp: Impact on impulses, attitudes and recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(3), 221–246.
23.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.BalesW. D.BhatiA. S. (2016). Recidivism and time served in prison. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 106, 83–124.
24.
MitchellO.CochranJ. C.MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2017). Examining prison effects on recidivism: A regression discontinuity approach. Justice Quarterly, 34(4), 571–596.
25.
MulveyE. P. (2012, November). The Pathways to Desistance study: Design and methods. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. Retrieved June 3, 2013.
MuthénB.MuthénL. (1998–2017). Mplususer’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén and Muthén.
28.
NaginD. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice in America: 1975–2025 (pp. 199–264). University of Chicago Press.
29.
NaginD. S.CullenF. T.JonsonC. L. (2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 38, pp. 115–200). University of Chicago Press.
30.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology, 32(4), 581–606.
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
32.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371.
33.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). J.B. Lippincott.
ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.FarnworthM.JangS. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32(1), 47–83.
36.
VieraitisL. M.KovandzicT. V.MarvellT. B. (2007). The criminogenic effects of imprisonment: Evidence from state panel data, 1974–2002. Criminology and Public Policy, 6(3), 589–622.
37.
WaltersG. D. (2003). Changes in criminal thinking and identity in novice and experienced inmates: Prisonization revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(4), 399–421.
38.
WaltersG. D. (2016a). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1055–1079.
39.
WaltersG. D. (2016b). From prison to the streets: Can importation work in reverse?Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 660–669.
40.
WaltersG. D. (2019). Why are mediation effects so small?International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(2), 219–232.
41.
WaltersG. D.YurvatiE. (2017). Testing the construct validity of the PICTS proactive and reactive scores against six putative measures of proactive and reactive criminal thinking. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(1), 1–14.
42.
WeatherburnD. (2010). The effect of prison on adult re-offending. Crime and Justice Bulletin No. 143, p. 12.
43.
WrightA. J.NicholsT. R.GraberJ. A.Brooks-GunnJ.BotvinG. J. (2004). It’s not what you say, it’s how many different ways you can say it: Links between divergent peer resistance skills and delinquency a year later. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(5), 380–391.
