Time studies have been conducted across a variety of occupations. However, no known research has examined the workload of correctional counselors. In this study, the Iowa Department of Corrections, in partnership with the American Probation and Parole Association, performed a workload evaluation of over 100 correctional counselors who participated in a time study. The most common activities concerned inmate requests, classification, assessment, release planning, treatment group work, and administrative tasks. Most concerning, respondents indicated anywhere from 20% to 50% of the activities engaged in were unsatisfactorily completed.
AlghamdiM. G. (2016). Nursing workload: A concept analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(4), 449–457.
2.
American Prosecutors Research Institute, & Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2002). How many cases should a prosecutor handle? Results of a national workload assessment project. Author.
3.
AnderstJ.TeranP.DowdM. D.SimonS.SchnitzerP. (2015). The association of the Rapid Assessment of Supervision Scale score and unintentional childhood injury. Child Maltreatment, 20(2), 141–145.
4.
BemusB. (1990). Colorado Judicial Department probation officer workload study. Office of the State Court Administrator.
5.
BercovitzJ.BemusB.HendricksW. S. (1993). Probation case classification & workload measures system for Indiana. Indiana Judicial Center.
6.
BurrellW. D. (2006). Caseload standards for probation and parole. Council of State Governments, American Probation and Parole Association.
7.
CarminesE. G.ZellerR. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage.
8.
CarrolaP. A.DeMatthewsD. E.ShinS. M.Corbin-BurdickM. F. (2016). Correctional counseling supervision: How supervisors manage the duality of security and mental health needs. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(2), 249–267.
9.
CarrolaP. A.OlivarezA.KarcherM. J. (2016). Correctional counselor burnout: Examining burnout rates using the Counselor Burnout Inventory. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55(3), 195–212.
10.
CarsonE. A. (2018). Prisoners in 2016. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
11.
ChapmanJ. B. (1972). Workload regulation: The case for purposive action. Probation Journal, 18(1), 8–11.
12.
CooperH. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Sage.
13.
Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2018a). Iowa’s statewide recidivism reduction strategy: Highlights and progress. Author.
14.
Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2018b). Strengthening correctional culture: Eight ways corrections leaders can support their staff to reduce recidivism. Author.
15.
Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2018c). Second Chance Act spotlight: Grant awards help Iowa corrections officers focus efforts to improve reentry outcomes. Author.
16.
CoyleA.FairH.JacobsonJ.WalmsleyR. (2016). Imprisonment worldwide: The current situation and an alternative future. Policy Press.
17.
CuddebackG. S.GaymanM.Bradley-EngenM. (2011). North Carolina probation/parole caseload standards and practices. North Carolina Department of Corrections.
18.
DavidsonC. (2012). 2012 Iowa Board of Parole risk assessment validation. Iowa Department of Human Rights, Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning, Statistical Analysis Center.
19.
DeMicheleM. T. (2008). Probation and parole’s growing caseloads and workload allocation: Strategies for managerial decision making. Council of State Governments, American Probation and Parole Association.
20.
DeMicheleM. T.PayneB. K. (2007). Probation and parole officers speak out: Caseload and workload allocation. Federal Probation, 71(3), 30–35.
21.
DeMicheleM. T.PayneB. K. (2012). Measuring community corrections’ officials perceptions of goals, strategies, and workload from a systems perspective: Differences between directors and nondirectors. The Prison Journal, 92(3), 388–410.
22.
DeMicheleM. T.PayneB. K. (2018). Taking officer time seriously: A study of the daily activities of probation officers. Probation Journal, 65(1), 39–60.
23.
DeMicheleM. T.PayneB. K.MatzA. K. (2011). Community supervision workload considerations for public safety. Council of State Governments, American Probation and Parole Association.
24.
DowdenC.AndrewsD. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practices. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203–214.
25.
EdwardsA.HughesG.LordN. (2013). Urban security in Europe: Translating a concept in public criminology. European Journal of Criminology, 10(3), 260–283.
26.
FahoomeG. F. (2002). Twenty nonparametric statistics and their large sample approximations. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 1(2), 248–268.
27.
FletcherA. J.MarchildonG. P. (2014). Using the Delphi method for qualitative, participatory action research in health leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 1–18.
28.
Frankfort-NachmiasC.Leon-GuerreroA. (2011). Social statistics for a diverse society (6th ed.). Sage.
29.
GavrielidesT. (2008). Restorative justice—the perplexing concept: Conceptual fault-lines and power battles within the restorative justice movement. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 8(2), 165–183.
30.
GillF. E. (2003). Moral benefit of Punishment: Self-determination as a goal of correctional counseling. Lexington Books.
31.
GreenR. A. (2014). The Delphi technique in educational research. Sage Open, 4(2), 1–8.
32.
GreenwoodP. (2014). Evidence-based practice in juvenile justice: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Springer.
33.
GriesseN. (2008). 2007 workload study. State of South Dakota, Board of Pardons and Paroles.
34.
HaasS. M.SpenceD. H. (2017). Use of core correctional practice and inmate preparedness for release. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(13), 1455–1478.
35.
HanserR. D.MireS. M. (2011). Correctional counseling. Pearson Education.
36.
HardymanP. L. (1999). Redefining community supervision strategies for Montana Bureau of Probation and Parole. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
37.
HardymanP. L. (2001). Computation of the workload formula for the Montana Bureau of Probation and Parole: Revised. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
38.
Iowa Department of Corrections. (2016). Prison Recidivism FY2016: Research in brief. Author.
39.
KelleyT. M. (2008). Principle-based correctional counseling: Teaching health versus treating illness. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 4(2), 182–205.
40.
KennedyD. B. (1984). Clinical sociology and correctional counseling. Crime & Delinquency, 30(2), 269–293.
41.
KleimanM.LeeC. G.OstromB. J. (2013). Workload assessment: A data-driven management tool for the judicial branch. In The book of the states (pp. 243–247). Council of State Governments.
42.
KratcoskiP. C. (2004). Correctional counseling and treatment (5th ed.). Waveland Press.
43.
LeeL. M. (2017). The impact of prison programming on recidivism. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research.
44.
LehmanW. E.GreenerJ. M.Rowan-SzalG. A.FlynnP. M. (2012). Organizational readiness for change in correctional and community substance abuse programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51(1/2), 96–114.
45.
MatzA. K.ConleyT. B.JohannesonN. (2018). What do supervision officers do? Adult probation/parole officer workloads in a rural Western state. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(3), 294–309.
46.
MilesA. P. (1969). Time studies in probation and parole. Crime & Delinquency, 15(2), 259–266.
47.
OrmeJ. (1988). Can workloads be measured?Probation Journal, 35(2), 57–59.
48.
PayneB. K.DeMicheleM. T. (2011). Probation philosophies and workload considerations. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(1), 29–43.
49.
RinggenbergJ. (2017). Iowa Department of Corrections FY2017 annual report. Iowa Department of Corrections.
50.
SalkindN. J. (2011). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. Sage.
51.
SchrinkJ. (1997). Understanding the correctional counselor. In Van VoorhisP.BraswellM.LesterD. (Eds.), Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 41–60). Anderson Publishing.
52.
SchrinkJ.HammM. S. (1989). Misconceptions concerning correctional counseling. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services & Rehabilitation, 14(1), 133–147.
53.
Sterling Associates. (2002). Washington State Department of Corrections: Community corrections: Workload study final report. Author.
54.
SunK. (2008). Correctional counseling: A cognitive growth perspective. Jones and Bartlett.
55.
SundtJ. L.DammerH. R.CullenF. T. (2002). The role of the prison chaplain in rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35(3/4), 59–87.
56.
TallaricoS.DouglasJ.FoggV. (2010). North Dakota juvenile court officer weighted workload assessment study. National Center for State Courts, Court Services Division.
57.
TallaricoS.DouglasJ.FriessE.HallD. J. (2009). Colorado judicial branch probation officer updated workload values study. National Center for State Courts, Court Services Division.
58.
TallaricoS.DouglasJ.KinneyE.MurphyM. (2007). South Dakota unified judicial system court services officers weighted workload assessment study. National Center for State Courts, Court Services Division.
59.
TallaricoS.DouglasJ.TomlinsonK.HallD. (2010). Alabama juvenile probation officer weighted workload assessment study. National Center for State Courts, Court Services Division.
60.
TwiggD.DuffieldC. (2008). A review of workload measures: A context for a new staffing methodology in Western Australia. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(1), 132–140.
61.
Van VoorhisP.SalisburyE. J. (2014). Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (8th ed.). Anderson Publishing.
62.
Van WormerK. (1999). The strengths perspective: A paradigm for correctional counseling. Federal Probation, 63(1), 51–58.
63.
WagnerD.ConnellS. (2004). North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Field Services Division: Probation and parole workload study. National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
64.
WalmsleyR. (2018). World prison population list (12th ed.). Birkbeck, University of London, Institute for Criminal Policy Research.
65.
Washington Department of Corrections. (2005). Community corrections workload study final report. Author.
