Despite the widespread use of restrictive housing in correctional institutions, little is known about the factors associated with placement in this setting. This study advances two theoretical arguments about the use of this practice. The prison system view argues this housing is essential for institutional order and that, accordingly, only inmates who pose an objective risk to safety get placed in such housing. By contrast, the critics’ view argues this housing causes adverse effects and disproportionately targets certain inmates based on their ascriptive characteristics, such as their mental health status or race. The results indicate support for both perspectives.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
BeckA. J. (2015). Use of restrictive housing in U.S. prisons and jails, 2011-12. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
4.
BelsleyD. A. (1991). Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression. New York, NY: John Wiley.
5.
BriggsC. S.SundtJ. L.CastellanoT. C. (2003). The effect of supermaximum security prisons on aggregate levels of institutional violence. Criminology, 41, 1341-1376.
6.
BrowneA.CambierA.AghaS. (2011). Prisons within prisons: The use of segregation in the United States. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 24, 46-49.
7.
BrutonJ. H. (2004). The big house: Life inside a supermax security prison. Stillwater, MN: Voyageur Press.
8.
ButlerH. D.GriffinO. H.IIIJohnsonW. W. (2013). What makes you the “worst of the worst?” An examination of state policies defining supermaximum confinement. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 676-694.
9.
ButlerH. D.SteinerB. (2016). Examining the use of disciplinary segregation within and across prisons. Justice Quarterly, 34, 248-271.
10.
ButlerH. D.SteinerB.MakariosM. D.TravisL. F. (2017). Assessing the effects of exposure to supermax confinement on offender postrelease behaviors. The Prison Journal, 97, 275-295.
11.
CloudD. H.DruckerE.BrowneA.ParsonsJ. (2015). Public health and solitary confinement in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 18-26.
12.
CochranJ. C.TomanE. L.MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2018). Solitary confinement as punishment: Examining in-prison sanctioning disparities. Justice Quarterly, 35, 381-411.
13.
ColvinM. (1992). The penitentiary in crisis: From accommodation to riot in New Mexico. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
CrouchB. M.MarquartJ. W. (1989). An appeal to justice: Litigated reform of Texas prisons. Austin: University of Texas Press.
15.
CrouchB. M.MarquartJ. W. (1990). Resolving the paradox of reform: Litigation, prisoner violence, and perceptions of risk. Justice Quarterly, 7, 103-123.
16.
DeRocheC. (2014). Testimony of Craig DeRoche, president of Justice Fellowship, before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, civil rights, and human rights. Available from http://www.judiciary.senate.gov
17.
DiIulioJ. J.Jr. (1987). Governing prisons: A comparative study of correctional management. New York, NY: Free Press.
18.
FellnerJ. (2000). Out of sight: Supermaximum security confinement in the U.S. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch.
19.
FellnerJ.MarinerJ. (1997). Cold storage: Super-maximum security confinement in Indiana. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch.
20.
FrostN. A.MonteiroC. E. (2016). Administrative segregation in prison. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future directions (pp. 1-47). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
21.
GavoraJ. (1996, August). Violent offenders should be placed in supermax prisons. The Washington Post. Available from http://www.washingtonpost.com
GendreauP.LabrecqueR. M. (2018). The effects of administrative segregation: A lesson in knowledge cumulation. In WooldredgeJ.SmithP. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on prisons and imprisonment (pp. 340-366). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
GoodeE. (2012, March). Prisons rethink isolation, saving money, lives and sanity. The New York Times. Available from http://www.nytimes.com
25.
GordonS. E. (2014). Solitary confinement, public safety, and recidivism. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 47, 495-528.
26.
GuentherL. (2012, August). The living death of solitary confinement. The New York Times. Available from http://www.nytimes.com
27.
HaneyC. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and “supermax” confinement. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 124-156.
28.
HaneyC. (2009). The social psychology of isolation: Why solitary confinement is psychologically harmful. Prison Service Journal, 181, 12-20.
29.
HaneyC. (2012a). Prison effects in the era of mass incarceration. The Prison Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0032885512448604
30.
HaneyC. (2012b). Testimony of professor Craig Haney to the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, civil rights, and human rights hearing on solitary confinement. Retrieved from http://www.judiciary.senate.gov
31.
HartmanK. E. (2008). Supermax prisons in the consciousness of prisoners. The Prison Journal, 88, 169-176.
32.
HelmusL. (2015). Developing and validating a risk assessment scale to predict inmate placements in administrative segregation in the Correctional Service of Canada (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
33.
HodginsS.CôtéG. (1991). The mental health of penitentiary inmates in isolation. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 33, 175-182.
34.
HuebnerB. M. (2003). Administrative determinants of inmate violence: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 107-117.
35.
KeimB. (2013, July). The horrible psychology of solitary confinement. Wired. Available from http://www.wired.com
36.
KingR. D. (1999). The rise and rise of supermax. Punishment & Society, 1, 163-186.
37.
KingR. D. (2005). Effects of supermax custody. In LieblingA.MarunaS. (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 118-145). Portland, OR: Willan.
38.
KupersT. A. (2008). What to do with the survivors? Coping with the long-term effects of isolated confinement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1005-1016.
39.
KurkiL.MorrisN. (2001). The purposes, practices, and problems of supermax prisons. Crime and Justice, 28, 385-424.
40.
LabrecqueR. M. (2015). The effect of solitary confinement on institutional misconduct: A longitudinal evaluation. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
41.
LabrecqueR. M. (2016). The use of administrative segregation and its function in the institutional setting. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future directions (pp. 49-84). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
42.
LabrecqueR. M.SmithP. (2013). Advancing the study of solitary confinement. In FuhrmanJ.BaierS. (Eds.), Prisons and prison systems: Practices, types, and challenges (pp. 57-70). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
43.
Liman Program and Association of State Correctional Administrators. (2015). Time-in-cell: The ASCA-Liman 2014 national survey of administrative segregation in prison. New Haven, CT: Yale Law School.
44.
LippkeR. L. (2004). Against supermax. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21, 109-124.
45.
LovellD. (2008). Patterns of disturbed behavior in a supermax prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 985-1004.
46.
LovellD.CloyesK.AllenD.RhodesL. (2000). Who lives in super-maximum custody? A Washington state study. Federal Probation, 64, 33-38.
47.
LovellD.JohnsonL. C.CainK. C. (2007). Recidivism of supermax prisoners in Washington State. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 633-656.
48.
McShaneM. D. (1989). The bus stop revisited: Discipline and psychiatric patients in prison. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 17, 413-433.
49.
MearsD. P. (2013). Supermax prisons: The policy and the evidence. Criminology & Public Policy, 12, 681-719.
50.
MearsD. P. (2016). Critical research gaps in understanding the effects of prolonged time in restrictive housing on inmates and the institutional environment. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future directions (pp. 233-295). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
51.
MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2009). Supermax incarceration and recidivism. Criminology, 47, 1131-1166.
52.
MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2010). Supermax housing: Placement, duration, and time to re-entry. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 545-554.
53.
MearsD. P.CastroJ. L. (2006). Wardens’ views on the wisdom of supermax prisons. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 398-431.
54.
MearsD. P.ReisigM. D. (2006). The theory and practice of supermax prisons. Punishment & Society, 8, 33-57.
55.
MearsD. P.WatsonJ. (2006). Towards a fair and balanced assessment of supermax prisons. Justice Quarterly, 23, 232-269.
56.
MedwedD.TennerielloB. (2016, February). The deplorable state of solitary confinement in Massachusetts. WGBH. Available from http://www.wgbh.org
57.
MetcalfH.MorganJ.Oliker-FriedlandS.ResnikJ.SpiegelJ.TaeH.. . . HolbrookB. (2013). Administrative segregation, degrees of isolation, and incarceration: A national overview of state and federal correctional policies. New Haven, CT: Liman Public Interest Program.
58.
MorganR. D.GendreauP.SmithP.GrayA. L.LabrecqueR. M.MacLeanN.. . . MillsJ. F. (2016). Quantitative syntheses of the effects of administrative segregation on inmates’ well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22, 439-461.
59.
MorrisR. G. (2016). Exploring the effect of exposure to short-term solitary confinement among violent prison inmates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 1-22.
60.
MotiukL. L.BlanchetteK. (2001). Characteristics of administratively segregated offenders in federal corrections. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43, 131-143.
61.
NadayA.FreilichJ. D.MellowJ. (2008). The elusive data on supermax confinement. The Prison Journal, 88, 69-93.
62.
National Institute of Corrections. (1997). Supermax housing: A survey of current practice. Longmont, CO: U.S. Department of Justice.
63.
Office of the Inspector General. (2017). Review of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ use of restrictive housing for inmates with mental illness. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
64.
O’KeefeM. L. (2007). Administrative segregation for mentally ill inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45, 149-165.
65.
O’KeefeM. L. (2008). Administrative segregation from within: A corrections perspective. The Prison Journal, 88, 123-143.
66.
PizarroJ. M.SteniusV. M. K. (2004). Supermax prisons: Their rise, current practices, and effect on inmates. The Prison Journal, 84, 248-264.
67.
PizarroJ. M.SteniusV. M. K.PrattT. C. (2006). Supermax prisons: Myths, realities, and the politics of punishment in American society. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 6-21.
68.
PizarroJ. M.ZgobaK. M.HaugebrookS. (2014). Supermax and recidivism: An examination of the recidivism covariates among a sample of supermax ex-inmates. The Prison Journal, 94, 180-197.
69.
RalphP. H.MarquartJ. W. (1991). Gang violence in Texas prisons. The Prison Journal, 71, 38-49.
70.
ReisigM. D. (1998). Rates of disorder in higher-custody state prisons: A comparative analysis of managerial practices. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 229-244.
71.
RivelandC. (1999). Supermax prisons: Overview and general considerations. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
72.
SchlangerM. (2013). Prison segregation: Symposium introduction and preliminary data on racial disparities. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 18, 1-12.
ShamesA.WilcoxJ.SubramanianR. (2015). Solitary confinement: Common misconceptions and emerging safe alternatives. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
75.
ShepperdR. A.GeigerJ. R.WelbornG. (1996). Closed maximum security: The Illinois supermax. Corrections Today, 58, 84-87.
76.
SmithP. S. (2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. Crime and Justice, 34, 441-528.
77.
SteinerB.WooldredgeJ. D. (2013). Implications of different outcome measures for an understanding of inmate misconduct. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 1234-1262.
78.
StubblefieldR. (2002). Prisons should not coddle inmates. In EspejoR. (Ed.), America’s prisons: Opposing viewpoints (pp. 100-104). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
79.
TaubM. (2000, January). Super-max punishment in prisons. Resist. Available from http://www.resist.org
80.
TochH. (1982). The disturbed disruptive inmate: Where does the bus stop?The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 10, 327-349.
81.
TochH. (2003). The contemporary relevance of early experiments with supermax reform. The Prison Journal, 83, 221-228.
82.
TochH.KupersT. A. (2007). Violence in prisons, revisited. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45, 1-28.
83.
UseemB.KimballP. (1991). States of siege: U.S. prison riots 1971-1986. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
84.
UseemB.ReisigM. D. (1999). Collective action in prisons: Protest, disturbances, and riots. Criminology, 37, 735-760.
85.
WardD. A. (2009). Alcatraz: The gangster years. Berkeley: University of California Press.
86.
WardD. A.WerlichT. G. (2003). Alcatraz and Marion: Evaluating super-maximum custody. Punishment & Society, 5, 53-75.
87.
ZingerI.WichmannC.AndrewsD. A. (2001). The psychological effects of 60 days in administrative segregation. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43, 47-83.
