This article draws on research conducted with Canadian provincial correctional officers who have experience with youth in closed-custodial settings since the enactment of the 2003 Youth Criminal Justice Act. In Canada, where attempts to avoid a full embrace of the punitive turn seem to be persistent, we examine youth justice as the “last bastion” of the rehabilitative ideal as mediated by youth correctional officers. Our findings reveal that while officers retain a clear commitment to the ideal of rehabilitation and a desire to “save” young people, they are increasingly under siege by the changing context of prison, shifting managerial priorities, and the paradox of trying to help convicted youth in an inherently punitive environment.
BalaN. (1994). What’s wrong with YOA bashing? What’s wrong with the YOA—Recognizing the limits of the law. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 36(3), 247-270.
5.
BalaN.CarringtonP. (2016). The changing nature of youth justice. In RobertsJ.GrossmanM. (Eds.), Criminal justice in Canada: A reader (5th ed., pp. 265-277). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Nelson.
6.
BalaN.CarringtonP.RobertsJ. (2009). Evaluating the Youth Criminal Justice Act after five years: A qualified success. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 51, 131-167.
7.
BarberJ.DoobA. (2004). An analysis of public support for severity and proportionality in the sentencing of youthful offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46, 327-342.
8.
BatemanT. (2011). “We now breach more kids in a week than we used to in a whole year”: The punitive turn, enforcement and custody. Youth Justice, 11, 115-133.
9.
BriggsD. (2013). Conceptualising risk and need: The rise of actuarialism and the death of welfare? Practitioner assessment and intervention in the youth offending service. Youth Justice, 13, 17-30.
10.
BrownD. (2005). Continuity, rupture, or just more of the “volatile and contradictory”? Glimpses of New South Wales’ penal practice behind and through the discursive the new punitiveness: Trends, theories, perspectives. In PrattJ.BrownD.BrownM.HallsworthS.MorrisonW. (Eds.), The new punitiveness: Trends, theories, perspectives (pp. 27-47). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
11.
BullenJ. (1991). J.J. Kelso and the “wew” child-savers: The genesis of the children’s aid movement in Ontario. In SmandychR.DoddsG.EsauA. (Eds.), Dimensions of childhood: Essays on the history of children and youth in Canada (pp. 135-158). Winnipeg, Canada: Legal Research Institute of the University of Manitoba.
12.
CesaroniC.Peterson-BadaliM. (2010). Understanding the adjustment of incarcerated young offenders: A Canadian example. Youth Justice, 10, 107-125.
13.
CrawleyE. (2004). Doing prison work: The public and private lives of prison officers. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
14.
DoobA.CesaroniC. (2004). Responding to youth crime in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
15.
DoobA.SprottJ. (2006). Assessing punitiveness in Canadian youth justice: A response to Hogeveen. Punishment & Society, 8, 477-480.
16.
FeeleyM.SimonJ. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449-474.
17.
FultonB.StichmanA.TravisL.LatessaE. (1997). Moderating probation and parole officer attitudes to achieve desired outcomes. The Prison Journal, 77, 295-312.
18.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
19.
GrayP. (2007). Youth justice, social exclusion and the demise of social justice. The Howard Journal, 46, 401-416.
20.
Hannah-MoffatK. (2001). Punishment in disguise: Penal governance and federal imprisonment of women in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
21.
LieblingA.CreweB. (2012). Prisons beyond the new penology: The shifting moral foundations of prison management. In SimonJ.SparksR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of punishment and society (pp. 283-307). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
22.
LynchM. (2000). Rehabilitation as rhetoric: The ideal of reformation in contemporary parole discourse and practices. Punishment & Society, 2, 40-65.
23.
MeyerJ.O’MalleyP. (2005). Missing the punitive turn? Canadian criminal justice, “balance,” and penal modernism. In PrattJ.BrownD.BrownM.HallsworthS.MorrisonW. (Eds.), The new punitiveness: Trends, theories, perspectives (pp. 201-217). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
24.
MitchellaO.MackenzieaD.StyveaG.GoveraA. (2000). The impact of individual, organizational, and environmental attributes on voluntary turnover among juvenile correctional staff members. Justice Quarterly, 17, 333-357.
25.
MoffittT. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
26.
MoonM.SundtJ.CullenF.WrightJ. (2000). Is child saving dead? Public support for juvenile rehabilitation. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 38-60.
27.
MooreD. (2011). The benevolent watch: Therapeutic surveillance in drug treatment court. Theoretical Criminology, 15, 255-268.
28.
MooreD.Hannah-MoffatK. (2005). The liberal veil: Revisiting Canadian penality. In PrattJ.BrownD.BrownM.HallsworthS.MorrisonW. (Eds.), The new punitiveness: Trends, theories, perspectives (pp. 85-100). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
29.
MuncieJ. (2005). The globalization of crime control—The case of youth and juvenile justice: Neo-liberalism, policy convergence and international conventions. Theoretical Criminology, 9, 35-64.
30.
MuncieJ. (2006). Governing young people: Coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice. Critical Social Policy, 26, 770-793.
MuncieJ.GoldsonB. (2006b). England and Wales: The new correctionalism. In MuncieJ.GoldsonB. (Eds.), Comparative youth justice (pp. 34-47). London, England: SAGE.
33.
MuncieJ.GoldsonB. (2006c). States of transition: Convergence and diversity in international youth justice. In MuncieJ.GoldsonB. (Eds.), Comparative youth justice (pp. 196-218). London, England: SAGE.
34.
NelkenD. (2006). Italy: A lesson in tolerance? In MuncieJ.GoldsonB. (Eds.), Comparative youth justice (pp. 159-176). London, England: SAGE.
35.
O’MalleyP. (1999). Volatile and contradictory punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 3, 175-196.
36.
PiqueroA.SteinbergL. (2010). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1-6.
37.
PösöT.KitinojaM.KekoniT. (2010). Locking up for the best interests of the child—Some preliminary remarks on “special care.”Youth Justice, 10, 245-257.
RicciardelliR. (2014). Surviving incarceration: Inside Canadian prisons. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
40.
RobertsJ. (2004). Harmonizing the sentencing of young and adult offenders: A comparison of the Youth Criminal Justice Act and Part XXIII of the criminal code. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46, 301-326.
41.
RobinsonG. (1999). Risk management and rehabilitation in the probation service: Collision and collusion. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 421-433.
42.
RobinsonG. (2008). Late-modern rehabilitation: The evolution of a penal strategy. Punishment & Society, 10, 429-445.
43.
SchisselB. (2006). STILL blaming children: Youth conduct and the politics of child hating. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.
44.
SmandychR. (2006). Canada: Repenalization and young offenders’ rights. In MuncieJ.GoldsonB. (Eds.), Comparative youth justice (pp. 19-54). London, England: SAGE.
uit BeijerseJ.van SwaaningenR. (2006). The Netherlands: Penal-welfarism and risk management. In MuncieJ.GoldsonB. (Eds.), Comparative youth justice (pp. 65-78). London, England: SAGE.
48.
UmamaheswarJ. (2013). Bringing hope and change: A study of youth probation officers in Toronto. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 1158-1182.
49.
Van NessD. (2005). Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice Daniel Van Ness and Karen Heetderks Strong 2015. New York: Routledge.
WardG.KupchikA. (2010). What drives juvenile probation officers? Relating organizational contexts, status characteristics, and personal convictions to treatment and punishment orientations. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 35-69.
52.
WerthR. (2013). The construction and stewardship of responsible yet precarious subjects: Punitive ideology, rehabilitation, and “tough love” among parole personnel. Punishment & Society, 15, 219-246.
53.
WhiteheadJ.LindquistC. (1989). Determinants of correctional officers’ professional orientation. Justice Quarterly, 6, 69-85.
