Quantifying the Size of the Contraband Cell Phone Problem: Insights From a Large Rural State Penitentiary

Abstract

Cell phones are one of the most challenging forms of contraband for correctional facilities. The size of this problem is difficult to quantify. Confiscation data are only able to tell a partial story. Through the use of a unique data collection effort, this research details the number of contraband cell phones within a facility and offers the first attempt to estimate the gap that exists between the number of contraband cell phones available and the number that are confiscated. In light of the findings, implications for policy and an agenda for research on contraband cell phone market dynamics are provided.

Keywords

contraband cell phones confiscations institutional corrections managed access

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berg

Huebner

(2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28, 382-410.

Blackburn

A. G.

Fowler

S. K.

Mullings

J. L.

Marquart

J. W.

(2011). When boundaries are broken: Inmate perceptions of correctional staff boundary violations. Deviant Behavior, 32, 351-378.

Burke

T. W.

Owen

S. S.

(2010). Cell phones as prison contraband. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 79, 10-15.

California Council on Science and Technology. (2012). The efficacy of managed access systems to intercept calls from contraband cell phones in California prisons [Fact sheet]. Sacramento: Author.

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2014). Contraband cell phones in CDCR prisons and conservation camps. Sacramento: Author.

Cochran

Mears

(2013). Social isolation and inmate behavior: A conceptual framework for theorizing prison visitation and guiding and assessing research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 252-261.

Contraband cell phones in correctional facilities: Public safety impact and the potential implications of jamming technologies: Hearings before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Senate , 111^th Cong. 1 (2009).

Coppola

(2014, July/August). Corrections department allowing use of cordless phones for inmates. TechBeat, pp. 11-13.

Davidson

(1974). Chicano prisoners: The key to San Quentin. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

10.

Duwe

Clark

(2013). Blessed be the social tie that binds: The effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 271-296.

11.

Eason

(2008). Mapping prison proliferation: Region, rurality, race and disadvantage in prison placement. Social Science Research, 39, 1015-1028.

12.

Farrell

Tseloni

Mailley

Tilley

(2011). The crime drop and the security hypothesis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 147-175.

13.

Farrington

(2014, February). Prisoners’use of smuggled cellphones on the rise. NewsOK. Retrieved from http://newsok.com/article/feed/651956

14.

Federal Communications Commission. (2014). Rates for interstate inmate calling services. Washington, DC: Author.

15.

Fishman

L. T.

(1991). Treacherous trysts, tender trade: Prisoners’ wives as contacts and contraband carriers. Women & Criminal Justice, 2, 45-70.

16.

Foster

T. W.

(1982). “Mushfaking”: A compensatory behavior of prisoners. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117, 115-124.

17.

Global Tel Link and Tecore. (2010). Managed access: The ultimate solution to eliminate contraband cell phones in prisons. Mobile, AL: Author.

18.

Government Accountability Office. (2011). Bureau of prisons: Improved evaluations and increased coordination could improve cell phone detection. Washington, DC: Author.

19.

Guenther

A. L.

(1975). Compensations in a total institution: The forms and functions of contraband. Crime & Delinquency, 21, 243-254.

20.

Irwin

(1970). The felon. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

21.

Jacobs

J. B.

(1977). Stateville: The penitentiary in mass society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

22.

Kalinich

D. B.

(1986). Power, stability, and contraband: The inmate economy. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

23.

Kalinich

D. B.

Stojkovic

(1985). Contraband: The basis for legitimate power in a prison social system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 435-451.

24.

Marquart

J. W.

Barnhill

M. B.

Balshaw-Biddle

(2001). Fatal attraction: An analysis of employee boundary violations in a southern prison system, 1995-1998. Justice Quarterly, 18, 877-910.

25.

Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services. (2010). Non-jamming cell phone pilot summary. Towson: Author.

26.

Mississippi Department of Corrections. (2013). Operation cellblock: Locking down illegal cell phone traffic [Presentation]. Houston, TX: Author.

27.

Morris

R. G.

Worrall

J. L.

(2014). Prison architecture and inmate misconduct: A multilevel assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 1083-1109.

28.

Preventing Contraband Cell Phone Use in Prison: Hearings before the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Department of Commerce. (2010).

29.

Rogers

(2013). Electronic prison contraband still a big problem. Corrections Forum, 22(2), 16-18.

30.

Seville

L. R.

(2016, January). Dozens of officers, inmates charged in Georgia prison cellphone scams. NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/dozensofficers-inmates-charged-georgia-prison-cellphone-scams-n502286

31.

Shaffer

J. S.

(2014). Cell phone forensics in a correctional setting: Guidebook. Washington, DC: Corrections Technology Center of Excellence, National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center.

32.

Siennick

Mears

Bales

(2013). Here and gone: Anticipation and separation effects of prison visits on inmate infractions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 417-444.

33.

Skarbek

(2012). Prison gangs, norms, and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82, 96-109.

34.

Skogan

W. G.

(1977). Dimensions of the dark figure of unreported crime. Crime & Delinquency, 23, 41-50.

35.

Smith

(2011). Americans and text messaging. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

36.

Sykes

G. M.

(2007). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

37.

van der Laan

. (2012). “Prison doesn’t stop them”: Orchestrating criminal acts from behind bars. Trends in Organized Crime, 15, 130-145.

38.

Worley

Marquart

J. W.

Mullings

J. L.

(2003). Prison guard predators: An analysis of inmates who established inappropriate relationships with prison staff, 1995-1998. Deviant Behavior, 24, 175-194.

39.

Worley

R. M.

Worley

V. B.

(2013). Games guards play: A self-report study of institutional deviance within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society, 26, 115-132.