Living Arrangements for Sex Offenders in Ohio: Effects of Economics,Law,and Government Assistance Programs

Abstract

Throughout the United States, Sex Offender Registration and Notification (SORN) laws have created housing issues for registered sex offenders (RSOs). As a result of SORN, many RSOs may need to rely on family members for their housing needs. This study, drawing on data from 188 adult male RSOs in Ohio, focused on two separate SORN laws (i.e., Megan’s Law and the Adam Walsh Act). The findings suggest that neither law influences RSOs’ living with family members. However, the results did conclude that an RSO’s income, receipt of government assistance, or being on probation/parole predicted the odds of living with family members. Policy implications of such findings are discussed.

Keywords

registered sex offenders housing Megan’s Law Adam Walsh Act

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, 2006 (42 U.S.C. §).

Burchfield

K. B.

Mingus

(2008). Not in my neighborhood: Assessing registered sex offenders’ experiences with local social capital and social control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 356-374.

Conner

D. P.

(2015). Support partners of registered sex offenders: Exploring their experiences, identities, and perceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, KY.

Duwe

Donnay

(2008). The impact of Megan’s law on sex offender recidivism: The Minnesota experience. Criminology, 46, 411-446.

Dyck

J. J.

Hagley

(2012). Political geography, direct democracy, and the reasoning voter: Spatial proximity, symbolic politics, and voting of California’s Proposition 83. Politics & Policy, 40, 195-220.

Farkas

M. A.

Miller

(2007). Reentry and reintegration: Challenges faced by the families of convicted sex offenders. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 20, 88-92.

Fox

(1991). Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Regression diagnostics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Greenfeld

L. A.

(1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Hanson

R. K.

Bussière

M. T.

(1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.

10.

Harris

A. J.

Lobanov-Rostovsky

Levenson

J. S.

(2010). Widening the net: The effects of transitioning to the Adam Walsh Act’s federally mandated sex offender classification system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 503-519.

11.

Hipp

J. R.

Turner

Jannetta

(2010). Are sex offenders moving into social disorganization? Analyzing the residential mobility of California parolees. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 47, 559-590.

12.

Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act, Public Law 103-322 (1994).

13.

Jennings

W. G.

Zgoba

K. M.

Tewksbury

(2012). A comparative longitudinal analysis of recidivism trajectories and collateral consequences for sex and non-sex offenders released since the implementation of sex offender registration and community notification. Journal of Crime & Justice, 35, 356-364.

14.

Justice Policy Institute. (2008). What will it cost states to comply with the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act? Retrieved from http://www.justicepolicy.org/images/upload/08-08_FAC_SORNACosts_JJ.pdf

15.

Justice and Public Safety Systems Ohio. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.lsc.state.oh.us/fiscal/ohiofacts/sep2010/justiceandpublicsafetysystems.pdf

16.

Kernsmith

P. D.

Craun

S. W.

Foster

(2009). Public attitudes toward sexual offenders and sex offender registration. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18, 290-301.

17.

Koyanagi

(2002). A better life—A safe community helping inmates access federal benefits (A Bazelon Center Issue Brief). Washington, DC: Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law.

18.

Levenson

J. S.

Brannon

Y. N.

Fortney

Baker

(2007). Public perception about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policies, 7, 137-161.

19.

Levenson

J. S.

Cotter

L. P.

(2005a). The effect of Megan’s law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 49-66.

20.

Levenson

J. S.

Cotter

L. P.

(2005b). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-178.

21.

Levenson

J. S.

D’Amora

D. A.

Hern

A. L.

(2007). Megan’s law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 587-602.

22.

Levenson

J. S.

Tewksbury

(2009). Collateral damage: Family members of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 54-68.

23.

Megan’s Law, Public Law 104-45, Stat 110 (1996).

24.

Mercado

C. C.

Alvarez

Levenson

(2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community reentry. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 20, 188-205.

25.

Mustaine

E. E.

Tewksbury

(2011). Residential relegation of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 44-57.

26.

Mustaine

E. E.

Tewksbury

Stengel

K. M.

(2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27, 329-350.

27.

National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. (2015). Map of registered sex offenders in the United States and territories. Retrieved from http://www.missingkids.com/content/dam/ncmec/en_us/SOR%20Map%20with%20Explanation.pdf

28.

Neito

Jung

(2006). The impact of residency restrictions on sex offenders and correctional management: A literature review. Sacramento: California Research Bureau.

29.

Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering and Tracking. (2015). Spring 2015 Newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.smart.gov/newsroom_jurisdictions_sorna.htm

30.

Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. (2007). Best practices tool-kit: Sex offender registration and notification. Columbus: Author. Retrieved from https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/30140/Tool-Kit%20SO%20Assessment%20and%20Treatment.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

31.

Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services. (2006). Report to the Ohio criminal sentencing commission: Sex offenders. Columbus, OH: Author.

32.

Ohio Office of the Attorney General. (2012). Electronic sex offender registration and notification. Available from http://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/

33.

Ohio Senate Bill 10, Ohio Revised Code §§ 2950 (2007).

34.

Ragusa-Salerno

Zgoba

K. M.

(2012). Taking stock of 20 years of sex offender laws and research: An examination of whether sex offender legislation has helped or hindered our efforts. Journal of Crime & Justice, 35, 335-355.

35.

Rhine

Smith

Jackson

(1991). Paroling authorities: Recent history and current practice (American Correctional Association). Waldorf, MD: St. Mary’s Press.

36.

Roman

C. G.

Travis

(2004). Taking stock: Housing, homelessness, and prison reentry. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Center, The Urban Institute.

37.

Sandler

J. C.

Freeman

N. J.

Socia

K. M.

(2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York’s state sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 284-302.

38.

Solomon

Roman

C. G.

Waul

(2001). Summary of focus groups with ex-prisoners in the district: Ingredients for successful reintegration. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

39.

State v. Bodyke, 126 Ohio St.3d 266, 2010-Ohio-2424.

40.

State v. Pfeifer, 2011-Ohio-289.

41.

State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374.

42.

Tewksbury

(2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 67-81.

43.

Tewksbury

Jennings

W. G.

(2010). Assessing the impact of sex offender registration and community notification on sex-offending trajectories. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 570-582.

44.

Tewksbury

Jennings

W. G.

Zgoba

K. M.

(2012). A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior to and following the implementation of SORN. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 308-328.

45.

Tewksbury

Levenson

(2009). Stress experiences of family members of registered sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 611-626.

46.

Tewksbury

Mustaine

E. E.

Rolfe

S. M.

(2016). Sex offender residential mobility and relegation: The collateral consequences continue. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 852-866.

47.

Tewksbury

Zgoba

K. M.

(2010). Perception and coping with punishment. How registered sex offenders respond to stress and internet restriction, and the collateral consequences of registration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 537-551.

48.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). The national guidelines for sex offender registration and notification: Final guidelines. Retrieved from https://ojp.gov/smart/pdfs/final_sornaguidelines.pdf

49.

Vásquez

B. E.

Maddan

Walker

J. T.

(2008). The influence of sex offender registration and notification laws in the United States: A time-series analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 175-192.

50.

Visher

C. A.

(2007). Returning home: Emerging findings and policy lessons about prisoner reentry. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 20, 93-102.

51.

Willis

G. M.

Grace

R. C.

(2009). Assessment of community reintegration planning for sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 494-512.