Parole is the linchpin of correctional practices, but few studies have examined discretionary parole in a rural population. The current study examines static risk and dynamic needs that influence parole decision making in a rural jail population. Data were collected on parole releases over a 3-year period beginning in 2012. Offenders received recommendations for parole from a reentry assessment team. Logistic regression was used to explain variance in the factors influencing discretionary parole release. Obstacles or challenges that offenders face when paroling to a rural location were also examined. Several policy recommendations are addressed.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39-59. doi:1037/a0018362
2.
ApplegateB. K.SitrenA. H. (2008). The jail and the community: Comparing jails in rural and urban contexts. The Prison Journal, 88, 252-269.
3.
BowkerG. M. (2002). Jail resource issues: What every funding authority needs to know (NIC 017372). Washington, MD: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
4.
CaplanJ. M. (2007). What factors affect parole: A review of empirical research. Federal Probation, 71(1), 16-20.
5.
CarrollJ. S.BurkeP. A. (1990). Evaluation and predication in expert parole decisions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 315-332.
ClarkV. A. (2016). Predicting two types of recidivism among newly released prisoners: First addresses as “launch pads” for recidivism or reentry success. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 1364-1400. doi:10.1177/0011128714555760
GarlandB.WodahlE. J.MayfieldJ. (2011). Prisoner reentry in a small metropolitan community: Obstacles and policy recommendations. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 90-110. doi:10.1177/0887403409359804
12.
GlazeL.KaebleD. (2014). Correctional populations in the United States, 2013. U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpus13.pdf
13.
GrendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-607.
14.
KlofasJ. M. (1990). The jail and the community. Justice Quarterly, 7, 69-102.
15.
MakariosM.SteinerB.TravisL. F. (2010). Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women release from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1377-1391. doi:10.1177/0093854810382876
16.
MatejkowskiJ.CaplanJ. M.Wiesel-CullenS. (2010). The impact of severe mental illness on parole decisions: Social integration within a prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1005-1029. doi:10.1177/0093854810372898
17.
MaysG.ThompsonJ. (1991). The political and organizational context of American jails. In ThompsonJ.MaysG. (Eds.), American jails: Public policy issues (pp. 3-21). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
18.
MenardS. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis. (Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
MooneyJ. L.DaffernM. (2011). Institutional aggression as a predictor of violent recidivism: Implications for parole decision making. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 52-63. doi:10.1080/14999013.2010.550984
20.
MooneyJ. L.DaffernM. (2014). Decision-making and violent offenders’ performance on parole. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 21, 385-405. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.818521
21.
MorrisR. G.LongmireD. R.Buffington-VollumJ.VollumS. (2010). Institutional misconduct and differential parole eligibility among capital inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 417-438. doi:10.1177/0093854810361672
22.
PampelF. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. (Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
ProctorJ. L.PeaseM. (2000). Parole as institutional control: A test of specific deterrence and offender misconduct. The Prison Journal, 80, 39-55. doi:10.1177/0032885500080001003
25.
RuddellR.MaysG. L. (2007). Rural jails: Problematic inmates, overcrowded cells, and cash-strapped counties. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 251-260.
26.
RuddellR.MaysG. L. (2011). Trouble in the heartland: Challenges confronting rural jails. International Journal of Rural Criminology, 1, 105-131.
27.
SchlagerM. (2013). Rethinking the reentry paradigm: A blue print of action. Durham, NC: Carolina Press.
28.
TzengS. (2014). Applying DEMATEL to investigate the relationship between factors affecting parole boards’ decision-making in Taiwan. The Prison Journal, 94, 118-136. doi:10.1177/0032885513512096
29.
WardK. C.MerloA. V. (2016). Rural jail reentry and mental health: Identifying challenges for offenders and professionals. The Prison Journal, 96, 27-52. doi:10.1177/0032885515605473
30.
WeisheitR. A.WellsL. E. (1996). Rural crime and justice: Implications for theory and research. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 379-397.
31.
WhiteM. D.SaundersJ.FisherC.MellowJ. (2012). Exploring inmate reentry in a local jail setting: Implications for outreach, service use, and recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 124-146.
32.
WodahlE. (2006). The challenges of prisoner reentry from a rural perspective. Western Criminology Review, 72(2), 32-47.
33.
ZajacG.HutchinsonR.MeyerC. (2014). An examination of rural prisoner reentry challenges. University Park: The Justice Center for Research at the Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved from http://justicecenter.psu.edu/research/projects/rural-reentry
ZhangY.ZhangL.VaughnM. S. (2014). Indeterminate and determinate sentencing models: A state-specific analysis of their effects on recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 693-715. doi:10.1177/0011128709354047
