This study evaluated the effectiveness of prison-based educational programming by examining the effects of obtaining secondary and post-secondary degrees on recidivism and post-release employment outcomes among offenders released from Minnesota prisons between 2007 and 2008. Obtaining a secondary degree in prison significantly increased the odds of securing post-release employment but did not have a significant effect on recidivism or other employment measures such as hourly wage, total hours worked, or total wages earned. Earning a post-secondary degree in prison, however, was associated with greater number of hours worked, higher overall wages, and less recidivism.
AdamsK.BennettK. J.FlanaganT. J.MarquartJ. W.CuvelierS. J.FritschE.. . .BurtonV. S. (1994). A large-scale multidimensional test of the effect of prison education programs on offenders’ behavior. The Prison Journal, 74, 433-449.
2.
AndersonD. (1995). Evaluation of the impact of correctional education programs on recidivism. Columbus: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Office of Management Information Systems, Bureau of Planning and Evaluation.
3.
AosS.MillerM.DrakeE. (2006). Evidence-based adult corrections programs: What works and what does not. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
4.
BatiukM. E.LahmK. F.McKeeverM.WilcoxN.WilcoxP. (2005). Disentangling the effects of correctional education: Are current policies misguided? An event history analysis. Criminal Justice, 5, 55-74.
5.
BatiukM. E.MokeP.RountreeP. W. (1997). Crime and rehabilitation: Correctional education as an agent of change—A research note. Justice Quarterly, 14, 167-180.
6.
BersteinJ.HoustonE. (2000). Crime and work: What we can learn from the low-wage labor market. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
7.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Economic news release: Table A-4. Employment status of the civilian population 25 years and over by educational attainment. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t04.htm
8.
ChoR. M.TylerJ. H. (2010). Does prison-based adult basic education improve postrelease outcomes for male prisoners in Florida?Crime & Delinquency, 59, 975-1005.
9.
FarringtonD. P. (2005). Childhood origins of antisocial behavior. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 12, 177-190.
10.
GottfredsonM. (1979). Treatment destruction techniques. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 16, 39-54.
11.
HaganJ.McCarthyB. (1997). Intergeneratioal sanction sequences and trajectories of street-crime amplification. In GotlibI. H.WheatonB. (Eds.), Stress and adversity over the life course: Trajectories and turning points (pp. 73-90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
HarlowC. W. (2003). Education and correctional populations [Special report]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
13.
HuizingaD.LoeberR.ThornberryT. P.CothernL. (2000). Co-occurrence of delinquency and other problem behaviors (Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
LiptonD. S.MartinsonR.WilksJ. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. Albany: New York Office of Crime Control Planning.
16.
LockwoodS.NallyJ.HoT.KnutsonK. (2012). The effect of correctional education on postrelease employment and recidivism: A 5-year follow-up study in the state of Indiana. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 380-396. doi:10.1177/0011128712441695
17.
MaguinE.LoeberR. (1996). Academic performance and delinquency. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 20, pp. 145-264). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
MartinsonR. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 34, 22-54.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
21.
PalmerT. (1978). Correctional intervention and research: Current issues and future prospects. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
22.
Pew Center on the States. (2008). One in 100: Behind bars in American 2008. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
23.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39, 33-38.
24.
RubinD. B. (1997). Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 757-763.
25.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26.
SteurerS. J.SmithL.TracyA. (2003). Three state recidivism study. Lanham, MD: Correctional Education Association.
27.
TewksburyR.TaylorT. M. (1996). The consequences of eliminating Pell Grant eligibility for students in post-secondary correctional education programs. Federal Probation, 60, 60-63.
28.
TolbertM. (2012). A reentry education model: Supporting education and career advancement for low-skill individuals in corrections. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
29.
UggenC. (1999). Ex-offenders and the conformist alternative: A job quality model of work and crime. Social Problems, 46, 127-151.
30.
Van VoorhisP.BrownK. (1996). Evaluability assessment: A tool for program development in corrections [Report]. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
31.
VisherC. A.LaVigneN.TravisJ. (2004). Returning home: Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry. Maryland Pilot Study: Findings from Baltimore. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
32.
WesternB.KlingJ. R.WeimanD. F. (2001). The labor market consequences of incarceration. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 410-427.
33.
WesternB.PettitB. (2010). Collateral costs: Incarceration’s effect on economic mobility. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
34.
WholeyJ. S. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
35.
WilsonD. B.GallagherC. A.MacKenzieD. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs for adult offenders. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 37, 347-368.
