The Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ) holds promise as a self-report measure that predicts the risk of recidivism and assesses treatment needs for incarcerated populations. However, its validity has been questioned for use with females. Using a random sample of 543 incarcerated women, we assessed the validity of the SAQ by examining differences in scale scores and Receiver Operating Characteristic curves using multiple measures of violent behavior among women. Self-reported violence, versus a violent conviction, was a strong predictor of SAQ scores, but many of those in the most violent group did not meet the published cut scores that indicate treatment need, suggesting the need for adjusting these thresholds for women.
AndradeJ.O’NeillK.DienerR. B. (2009). Violence risk assessment and risk management: A historical overview and clinical application. In AndradeJ. T. (Ed.), Handbook of violence risk assessment and treatment: New approaches for mental health professionals (pp. 3-40). New York, NY: Springer.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. A. (2001). Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R): User’s manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. A. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. A.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
5.
AnglinD. M.HserY. (1987). Addicted women and crime. Criminology, 25, 359-397.
6.
BontaJ. A.LawM.HansonR. K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123-142.
7.
BrennanT.DieterichW.EhretB. (2009). Evaluating the predictive validity of the COMPAS risk needs assessment system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 21-40.
8.
BrennanT.DieterichW.OliverW. L. (2006). COMPAS: Technical manual and psychometric report version 5.0. Traverse City, MI: Northpointe Institute.
9.
CampbellM. A.FrenchS.GendreauP. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 567-590.
10.
ChapmanL. J.ChapmanJ. P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 271-280.
11.
ChermackS. T.MurrayR. L.WintersJ. J.WaltonM. A.BoothB. M.BlowF. C. (2009). Treatment needs of men and women with violence problems in substance use disorder treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, 44, 1236-1262.
12.
CollinsR. E. (2010). Effect of gender on violent and nonviolent recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 675-684.
13.
ComackE.BalfourG. (2004). The power to criminalize: Violence, inequality and the law. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.
14.
DeschenesE. P.OwenB.CrowJ. (2007). Recidivism among female prisoners: Secondary analysis of the 1994 BJS recidivism data set. NCJ 216950, NIJ Sponsored,Report for the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C..
15.
ErezE. (1992). Dangerous men, evil women: Gender and parole decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 9, 105-126.
16.
GilbertP. R. (2002). Discourses of female violence and societal gender stereotypes. Violence Against Women, 8, 1271-1300.
17.
GloverA. J. J.NicholsonD. E.HemmatiT.BernfeldG. A.QuinseyV. L. (2002). A comparison of predictors of general and violence recidivism among high-risk federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 235-249.
18.
GoettingA. (1988). Patterns of homicide among women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 3-20.
19.
Hannah-MoffatK. (2009). Gridlock or mutability: Reconsidering “gender” and risk assessment. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 209-219.
20.
Hannah-MoffatK.YuleC. (2011). Gaining insight, changing attitudes and managing release decisions for women convicted of violent crimes. Punishment & Society, 13, 149-175.
21.
HoltfreterK.CuppR. (2007). Gender and risk assessment: The empirical status of the LSI-R for women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 363-382.
22.
KruttschnittC. (2002). Women’s involvement in serious interpersonal violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 529-565.
23.
KubiakS. P.KimW. J.FedockG.BybeeD. (2013). Differences among incarcerated women with assaultive offenses: Isolated versus patterned use of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 2462-2490.
24.
LaskoT. A.BhagwatJ. G.ZouK. H.Ohno-MachadoL. (2005). The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 38, 404-415.
25.
LazowskiL. E.MillerF. G.BoyeM. W.MillerG. A. (1998). Efficacy of the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory–3 (SASSI-3) in identifying substance dependence disorders in clinical settings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 71, 114-128.
26.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
LozaW.ConleyM.WarrenB. (2004). Concurrent cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism and institutional adjustment on a sample of North Carolina offenders. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 48, 85-95.
29.
LozaW.CumbletonA.ShahinfarA.NeoL. H.EvansM.ConleyM. (2004). Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): An offender risk assessment measure on Australian, British, Canadian, North Carolinian, Pennsylvanian, and Singaporeans offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1-18.
30.
LozaW.DhaliwalG.KronerD. G.Loza-FanousA. (2000). Reliability, construct, and concurrent validities of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 356-374.
31.
LozaW.GreenK. (2003). The Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A self-report measure for predicting recidivism versus clinician-administered measures: A 5-year follow-up study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 781-797.
32.
LozaW.Loza-FanousA. (1999a). Anger and prediction of violent and nonviolent offenders’ recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1014-1029.
33.
LozaW.Loza-FanousA. (1999b). The fallacy of reducing rape and violent recidivism by treating anger. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 492-502.
34.
LozaW.Loza-FanousA. (2002). The effectiveness of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire as an offenders classification measure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 3-13.
35.
LozaW.NeoL. H.ShahinfarA.Loza-FanousA. (2005). Cross-validation of the self-appraisal questionnaire: A tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism with female offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 547-560.
36.
ManchakS. M.SkeemJ. L.DouglasK. S.SiranosianM. (2009). Does gender moderate the predictive utility of the Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) for serious violent offenders?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 425-442.
37.
MannC. (1990). Female homicide and substance abuse: Is there a connection?Women and Criminal Justice, 1, 87-109.
38.
MannC. (1996). When women kill. Albany: State University of New York Albany Press.
39.
MarascuiloL. A.McSweeneyM. (1977). Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
40.
MorashM. (2009). A great debate over using the Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) with women offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 8, 173-181.
41.
MurrayR. L.ChermackS. T.WaltonM. A.WintersJ.BoothB. M.BlowF. C. (2008). Psychological aggression, physical aggression, and injury in nonpartner relationship among men and women in treatment for substance-use disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69, 896-905.
42.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43.
PollockJ. M.DavisS. M. (2005). The continuing myth of the violent female offender. Criminal Justice Review, 30(5), 5-28.
44.
PollockJ. M.MullingsJ. L.CrouchB. M. (2006). Violent women: Findings from the Texas women inmates study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 485-502.
45.
SchwartzJ.SteffensmeierD. J.FeldmeyerB. (2009). Assessing trends in women’s violence via data triangulation: Arrests, convictions, incarcerations, and victim reports. Social Problems, 56, 494-525.
46.
ShuteS. (2007). Parole and risk assessment. In PadefieldN. (Ed.), Who to release? Parole, fairness and criminal justice (pp. 21-42). Abingdon, UK: Willan Publishing.
47.
SilversteinM. (2006). Justice in genderland: Through a parole looking glass. Symbolic Interaction, 29, 393-410.
48.
SmithP.CullenF. T.LatessaE. J. (2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 183-208.
49.
SteffensmeierD. J.SchwartzJ.ZhongH.AckermanJ. (2005). An assessment of recent trends in girls’ violence using diverse longitudinal sources: Is the gender gap closing?Criminology, 43, 355-406.
50.
StoneA. A.TurkkanJ. S.BachrachC. A.JobeJ. B.KurtzmanH. S.CainV. S. (1999). The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
ThornberryT.KrohnM. (2000). The self report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In DuffeeD. (Ed.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 33-84). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
52.
Uniform Crime Reports. (2009). Crime in the United States, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
53.
Van VoorhisP.WrightE. M.SalisburyE.BaumanA. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 261-288.
54.
WaltersG. D. (2006). Risk-appraisal versus self-report in the prediction of criminal justice outcomes: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 279-304.
