Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines the recidivism covariates of 610 released inmates who were confined in a supermax unit in 2004. Follow-up data (an average of 66 months from prison release in 2004) were collected for each inmate to assess the recidivism covariates of those who re-engaged in crime after prison release. The findings show that when compared with ex-supermax inmates who did not recidivate, those who did were younger, more likely to be serving time for a drug offense, and had a history of prior incarcerations and disciplinary infractions while incarcerated. Time to recidivate, however, was significantly predicted by gang membership, length of sentence, and prior substance abuse history. The implications of this research are discussed.

Keywords

supermax administrative segregation recidivism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Briggs

C. S.

Sundt

J. L.

Castellano

T. C.

(2003). The effect of supermaximum security prisons on aggregate levels of institutional violence. Criminology, 41, 1341-1376.

Gendreau

Little

Goggin

(1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575-607.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Huebner

B. M.

Berg

M. T.

(2011). Examining the sources of variation in risk for recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28, 146-173.

Kurlychek

M. C.

Brame

Bushway

S. D.

(2006). Scarlet letters and recidivism: Does an old criminal record predict future offending? Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 483-503.

Langan

P. A.

Levin

D. J.

(2002). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report: Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/rpr94.pdf

Lovell

Cloyes

Allen

Rhodes

(2000). Who lives in super-maximum custody? A Washington State Study. Federal Probation, 64, 33-38.

Lovell

Johnson

L. C.

Cain

K. C.

(2007). Recidivism of supermax prisoners in Washington State. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 633-656.

Mears

D. P.

(2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of supermax prisons. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.

10.

Mears

D. P.

Bales

W. D.

(2009). Supermax incarceration and recidivism. Criminology, 47, 1131-1166.

11.

Mears

D. P.

Castro

J. L.

(2006). Wardens’ views on the wisdom of supermax prisons. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 398-431.

12.

Menard

(1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

13.

Nagin

D. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Jonson

C. L.

(2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. Crime & Justice, 38, 115-200.

14.

Pampel

F. C.

(2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

15.

Pizarro

J. M.

Narag

R. E.

(2008). Supermax prisons: What we know, what we do not know, & where we are going. The Prison Journal, 88, 23-42.

16.

Pizarro

J. M.

Stenius

V. M. K.

(2004). Supermax prisons: Their rise, current practices, and effect on inmates. The Prison Journal, 84, 248-264.

17.

Riveland

(1999). Supermax prisons: Overview and general considerations. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.

18.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1993). Crime in the making: Pathways & turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

19.

Sundt

J. L.

Castellano

T. C.

Briggs

C. S.

(2008). The sociopolitical context of prison violence and its control: A case study of supermax and its effect in Illinois. The Prison Journal, 88, 94-122.

20.

U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections. (1997). Supermax housing: A survey of current practices, special issues in corrections. Longmont, CO: National Institute of Corrections Information Center.

21.

Ward

D. A.

Werlich

T. G.

(2003). Alcatraz and Marion: Evaluating super-maximum custody. Punishment & Society, 5, 53-75.

Supermax and Recidivism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References