This study presents Israeli female inmates’ attitudes toward same-sex sexual relationships in prison and incentives to participation. The major findings are (a) conflict exists between the prevalence of same-sex sexual relationships among Israeli female inmates and prisoner negative attitudes toward them, (b) nearly all same-sex sexual relationships among shorter-term female inmates are based on economic exploitation and other benefits, and (c) most Jewish and Muslim female prisoners express negative attitudes toward same-sex sexual relationships in prison but, at the same time, participate in them. Unlike most female prisons in the Western world, the single women’s prison facility in Israel lacks pseudofamily networks.
AlaridL. (2000). Sexual assault and coercion among incarcerated women prisoners: Excerpts from prison letters, The Prison Journal, 80(4), 391-406.
2.
BosworthM. (1999). Engendering resistance: Agency and power in women’s prisons. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
3.
BriggsC. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ChenG. (2009). Patterns of crime and substance abuse among Israeli ex-addict female inmates. Asian Journal of Criminology, 4, 47-60.
5.
Chesney-LindM. (1986). Women and crime: The female offender. Signs, 12(1), 78-96.
6.
Chesney-LindM. (2006). Patriarchy, crime and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 6-26.
7.
EinatT. (2009a). Rape and consensual sex in male Israeli prisons: Are there differences with western prisons?The Prison Journal.
8.
EinatT. (2009b). Inmate harassment and rape: An exploratory study of seven maximum and medium security male prisons in Israel. The International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(6), 648-664.
9.
FaithK. (1993). Unruly women: The politics of confinement and resistance. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Press Gang Publishers.
10.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson
11.
FletcherB.ShaverL.MoonD. (Eds.). (1993). Women prisoners: A forgotten population. Westport, CT: Praeger.
12.
GartnerR.KrutschnittC. (2004). A brief history of doing time: The California institute for women in the 1960’s and the 1990’s. Law and Society Review, 38(2), 267-304.
13.
GiallombardoR. (1966). Society of women: A study of a woman’s prison. New York, NY: John Wiley.
14.
GiliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
15.
GirshickL. (1999). No safe haven: Stories of women in prison. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
16.
GreerK. (2000). The changing nature of interpersonal relationships in a women’s prison. The Prison Journal, 80, 442-467.
17.
HawkinsR. (1995). Inmate adjustment in women’s prison. In HaasK. C.AlpertG. P. (Eds.), The dilemmas of corrections: Contemporary readings (pp. 103-122). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
18.
HeffernanE. (1972). Making it in prison: The square, the cool, and the life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
19.
HensleyC.TewksburyR.KoscheskiM. (2002). The characteristics and motivations behind female prison sex. Women and Criminal Justice, 13, 125-139.
20.
HopperC. (1980). A study of homosexuality and surrogate families in an institution for women. American Journal of Sociology, 37, 247-253.
21.
IrwinJ.CresseyD. (1962). Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10, 145-147.
22.
JamesJ. (1980). Women’s liberation and the female delinquent. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17(2), 230-244.
23.
KelmanH. (1974). Attitudes are alive and well and gainfully employed in the sphere of action. American Psychologist, 29, 310-324.
24.
KoscheskiM.HensleyC.WrightJ.TewksburyT. (2002). Consensual sexual behavior. In HensleyC. (Ed.), Prison sex: Practice and policy (pp. 111-132). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
25.
MorashM.Robin HaarrR.RuckerL. (1994). A comparison of programming for women and men and US prisons in the 1980s. Crime and Delinquency, 40(2), 197-221.
26.
NelsonC. (1974). A study of homosexuality among women inmates at two state prisons. PhD dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
27.
Obergoot-SalevR. (2001). Coping of inmates in Israel prison-the pseudo-family. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
28.
OwenB. (1998). In the mix: Struggles and survival in a women’s prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
PogrebinM. (2003). Qualitative approaches to criminal justice perspectives from the field. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
Pollock-ByrneJ. (1990). Women, prison, and crime. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
31.
PropperA. (1976). Importation and deprivation perspectives on homosexuality in correctional institutions: An empirical test of their relative efficacy. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
32.
PropperA. (1982). Make-believe families and homosexuality among imprisoned Girls. Criminology, 20(1), 127-138.
33.
RubinH.RubinI. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
SilvermanD. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
37.
Struckman-JohnsonC.Struckman-JohnsonD.RuckerL.BumbyK. (1996). Sexual coercion reported by men and women in prison. The Journal of Sex Research, 33(1), 67-76.
38.
SykesG. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
TittleC. (1972). Society of subordinates: Inmate organization in a narcotic hospital. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
40.
WardD.KassebaumG. (1965). Women’s prison: Sex and social structure. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
