Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In July 2006, the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections began delivering a 2-hour training session titled “Reinforcing Positive Behavior” (RPB). Findings from an attitude survey showed that the training was effective for changing staff attitudes and awareness about inmate treatment and rehabilitative programs. Specific findings revealed that correctional officers, when compared with treatment staff, were less concerned about showing inmates respect and also minimized the impact of their own actions on inmate behavior and rehabilitation efforts. Policy implications and recommendations for improving the RPB training and for furthering data collection efforts during basic orientation and inside the state institutions will be discussed.

Keywords

staff reinforcing attitude rehabilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Eggen, D. , & Warrick, J. ( 2007, December 7). CIA destroyed videos showing interrogations: Harsh techniques seen in 2002 tapes. The Washington Post , p. A1.

Farkas, M.A. ( 2000). A typology of correctional officers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 431-449.

Gendreau, P. ( 1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 144-161.

Gordon, M.S. ( 2006). Correctional Officer control ideology: Implications for understanding a system. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 225-239.

Heckert, W.J. , Jengeleski, J.L. , & Gordon, M.S. ( 1998). Measuring correctional employees’ ideology. Pennsylvania Association on Probation, Parole & Correction Journal , 58(2), 21-26.

Lenton, G. ( 2007, July 13). Ex-inmates tell of abuse in county jail. The Patriot-News, p. A1.

Maahs, J. , & Pratt, T. ( 2001). Uncovering the predictors of correctional officers’ attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5(2), 13-19.

Montgomery, M.J. ( 2006). Leadership in a correctional environment. Corrections Compendium, 31(3), 1-5.

Parkinson, A.F. , & Steurer, S.J. ( 2004). Overcoming the obstacles in effective correctional instruction . Corrections Today, 66, 88-91.

10.

Shaffer, J.S. ( 1999). Life of the installment plan: Careers in corrections . Corrections Today, 61(7), 84-89.

11.

Simourd, D.J. , Lombardo, D.L. , & McKernan, P. ( 2006, May/June). Changing criminogenic risk/need factors: A prelude to recidivism reduction. Corrections Compendium, 31, 6-11.

12.

Stohr, M.K. , Hemmens, C. , Kifer, M. , & Schoeler, M. ( 2000). We know it, we just have to do it: Perceptions of ethical work in prisons and jails. The Prison Journal, 80, 126-150.

13.

Tewksbury, R. , & Collins, S.C. ( 2006). Aggression levels among correctional officers: Reassessing sex differences. The Prison Journal, 86, 327-343.

14.

Wilson, S. , & Chan, S. ( 2004, May 10). As insurgency grew, so did prison abuse: Needing intelligence, U.S. pressed detainees. The Washington Post , p. A1.

15.

Zortman, J. , Bucklen, K.B. , Snyder, D. , & Lategan, D. ( 2007). Sexual assault activity in PA state correctional institutions: A survey of prison rape. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.cor.state.pa.us/stats/lib/stats/PA_DOC_PREA_Report.pdf

When Actions and Attitude Count Most: Assessing Perceived Level of Responsibility and Support for Inmate Treatment and Rehabilitation Programs Among Correctional Employees

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References