The Detention Camp at Guantanamo Bay (DCGB) has emerged as one of the most controversial penal institutions in a post-9/11 world, raising sharp questions about its legality under international law and reports of harsh confinement conditions, coercive interrogations, and indefinite detention. Although a fast-growing literature addresses those issues, there are few penological excursions into the precise nature of DCGB and its internal workings. Attempting to offer a coherent theoretical interpretation, this article situates DCGB within the work of Michel Foucault. Although Foucault has undergone considerable critique for his writings on imprisonment, there remains much potential for improving scholars' understanding of the prison and specifically the role of DCGB in the war on terror. The analysis sets out to decipher the significance of penal discourse, technologies, and resistance unfolding at DCGB. By doing so, critical insights into various forms of modern power are illuminated alongside their unintended consequences. Implications for human rights are discussed throughout.
Adler, M., & Longhurst, B. (1994). Discourse, power and justice: Towards a new sociology of prisons. London: Routledge.
2.
Amann, D. (2004). Guantanamo Bay. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 263-348.
3.
Amnesty International. (2005). Guantanamo and beyond: The continuing pursuit of unchecked executive power . New York: Author.
4.
Begg, M. (2006). Enemy combatant: My imprisonment at Guantanamo Bay, Bagram, and Kandahar. London: New Press.
5.
Bennett, W.J., & DiIulio, J.J. (1996). Body count: Moral poverty and how to win America's war against crime and drugs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
Bosworth, M. (1999). Engendering resistance: Agency and power in women's prisons. Dartmouth, UK: Ashgate .
7.
Bosworth, M., & Carrabine, E. (2001). Reassessing resistance: Race, gender, and sexuality in prison. Punishment and Society, 3(4), 501-515.
8.
Carrabine, E. (2000). Discourse, governmentality and translation: Towards a social theory of imprisonment. Theoretical Criminology, 4(3), 309-331.
9.
Carrabine, E. (2004). Power, discourse and resistance: A genealogy of the Strangeways prison riot. Dartmouth, UK: Ashgate.
10.
Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
Cohen, S., & Taylor, L. (1981). Psychological survival: The experience of long-term imprisonment (2nd ed.). London : Penguin.
12.
Cohen, S., & Taylor, L. (1992). Escape attempts: The theory and practice of resistance to everyday life (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
13.
Cousins, M., & Hussain, A. (1984). Michel Foucault. New York: St. Martin's.
14.
Cowell, A. (2006, May 11). Briton wants Guantánamo closed. New York Times, pp. EV1-EV2.
15.
Crouch, B.M., & Marquart, J.W. (1990). Resolving the paradox of reform: Litigation, prisoner violence, and perceptions of risk. Justice Quarterly, 7(1), 103-123.
16.
Danner, M. (2004). Torture and truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the war on terror. London: Granta Books .
17.
Davis, A. (2001). Race, gender, and prison history: From convict lease system to the supermax prison. In D. Sabo & W. London (Eds.), Prison masculinities (pp. 35-45). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
18.
DiIulio, J.J., Jr. (1987). Governing prisons: A comparative study of correctional management. New York: Free Press .
19.
Dowker, F., & Good, G. (2002). Control units as a mechanism of social control . In T. Gray (Ed.), Exploring corrections (pp. 223-234). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
Durkheim, E. (1966). Suicide: A study in sociology. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1897)
21.
Ericson, R.V. (2007). Crime in an insecure world. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
22.
Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategies of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(2), 449-474.
23.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock
24.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
25.
Foucault, M. (1988). The dangerous individual. In L. D. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977-1984 (pp. 125-151). London: Routledge .
26.
Foucault, M. (1991). Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies of governmentality (pp. 73-86). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Garland, D. (2006). Concepts of culture in the sociology of punishment . Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), 419-448.
28.
Gido, R.L., & Alleman, T. (2002). Turnstile justice: Issues in American corrections (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
Golden, T. (2006a, September 17). The battle for Guantánamo. New York Times Magazine, pp. EV1-EV17.
30.
Golden, T. (2006b, December 16). Military taking a tougher line with detainees. New York Times, pp. EV1-EV6.
31.
Greenberg, K.J., & Dratel, J.L. (2005). The torture papers: The road to Abu Ghraib. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Hall, S. (1988). The hard road to renewal: Thatcherism and the crisis of the left. London: Verso .
33.
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004).
34.
Harbury, J. (2005). Truth, torture, and the American way: The history and consequences of U.S. involvement in torture. Boston : Beacon.
35.
Hepburn, J. (1985). The exercise of power in coercive organizations: A study of prison guards. Criminology, 23(1), 145-164.
36.
Hersh, S.M. (2004). Chain of command: The road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib . New York: HarperCollins.
37.
Human Rights Watch. (1997). Cold storage: Supermaximum confinement in Indiana. New York: Author.
38.
Human Rights Watch. (2000). Out of sight: Supermaximum security confinement in the United States. New York: Author.
39.
Human Rights Watch. (2004). Guantanamo: Detainee accounts. New York: Author.
40.
Human Rights Watch. (2005). Guantanamo: Three years of lawlessness. New York: Author.
41.
Jacobs, J.B. (1977). Stateville: The penitentiary in mass society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
King, R.D. (1999). The rise and rise of super-max: An American solution in search of a problem? Punishment and Society, 1, 163-186.
43.
Levy, J. (2007). My trip to Guantanamo Bay. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://www.aina.org/news/2007040293614.htm
44.
Lewis, N.A. (2004, March 21). US military describes findings at Guantanamo . New York Times, p. 8.
45.
Lewis, N.A. (2006, May 25). Court in abuse case hears testimony of general. New York Times, pp. EV1-EV2.
46.
Lockwood, D. (1992). Solidarity and schism: The problem of disorder in Durkheimian and Marxist sociology. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
47.
Lyon, D. (2006). Theorizing surveillance: The panopticon and beyond . Devon, UK: Willan.
48.
Mannheim, K. (1991). Ideology and utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge .
49.
Marquart, J.W. (1986). Prison guards and the use of physical coercion as a mechanism of prisoner control. Criminology, 24(2), 347-366.
50.
Marquart, J.W., & Crouch, B.M. (1985). Judicial reform and prisoner control: The impact of Ruiz v. Estelle on a Texas penitentiary. Law and Society Review, 19(4), 557-586.
51.
Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault's "panopticon" revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215-234.
52.
Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: John Wiley.
53.
McCoy, A.W. (2006). A question of torture: CIA interrogation, from the cold war to the war on terror. New York: Metropolitan Books.
54.
McShane, M. (1996). "Marion penitentiary." In M. McShane and F. Williams (Eds.), Encyclopedia of American prisons, pp. 317-318. New York: Garland Publishing.
55.
Miller, V. (2007). Tough men, tough prisons, tough times: The globalization of supermaximum security prisons. In M. Bosworth & J. Flavin (Eds.), Race, gender, and punishment: From colonialism to the war on terror (pp. 200-215). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
56.
Nietzsche, F. (1996). The genealogy of morals (in birth of tragedy and genealogy of morals) (D. Smith, Trans.). New York: Anchor. (Original work published 1887)
57.
Pious, R.M. (2006). The war on terrorism and the rule of law. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
58.
Posner, E. (2006, June 25). A threat that belongs behind bars. New York Times, pp. EV1-EV2.
59.
Rasul v. Bush and United States, 542 U.S. 466 (2004).
60.
Rhodes, L. (2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. Berkeley: University of California Press.
61.
Risen, J., & Golden, T. (2006, June 11). 3 prisoners commit suicide at Guantánamo . New York Times, pp. EV1-EV5.
62.
Rose, D. (2004). Guantanamo: America's war on human rights. London: Faber and Faber.
Rothman, D. (1971). The discovery of the asylum in the new republic . Boston: Little, Brown.
65.
Rothman, D. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown.
66.
Shanker, T., & Sanger, D.E. (2007, March 23). New to job, Gates argued for closing Guantánamo. New York Times, pp. EV1-EV6.
67.
Stafford-Smith, C. (2002, December 1). No justice and Guantanamo Bay. Observer, p. 23.
68.
Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
Taylor, D. (2006, October 13). I haven't stopped crying since I heard . . . I think they want to kill him: Mother tells how her hopes for her son's release from Guantánamo Bay were dashed by the appeal court. Guardian, pp. EV1-EV2.
70.
Thomas, J. (1988). Prisoner litigation: The paradox of the jailhouse lawyer. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield .
71.
Vogel, S. (2002, January 9). Afghan prisoners going to gray area military unsure what follows transfer to U.S. Base in Cuba. Washington Post, p. A1.
72.
Ward, D.A., & Werlich, T.G. (2003). Alcatraz and Marion: Evaluating supermaximum custody . Punishment and Society, 5(1), 53-75.
73.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1920)
74.
Weber, M. (1985). The protestant work ethic and the spirit of capitalism . London: Unwin. (Original work published 1905)
75.
Welch, M. (2004). Corrections: A critical approach (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
76.
Welch, M. (2005). Ironies of imprisonment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
Welch, M. (2008). Militarizing power in the war on terror: Unlawful enemy combatants and the Military Commissions Act. In R. Haveman & A. Smeulers (Eds.), Towards a criminology of international crimes (pp.). Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.
78.
Williams, G. (1999). French discourse analysis: The method of post-structuralism (pp. 293-307). London: Routledge.
