The supermax prison was designed to control the most violent, assaultive individuals, gang members, and other prisoners who could not be managed in less secure settings. Pelican Bay State Prison, which houses California's supermax, holds approximately 1,300 inmates in its security housing unit (SHU). This article examines the mission, architecture, and organization of Pelican Bay State Prison, the architecture and procedures in the SHU, the training and mind-set of correctional officers who work at Pelican Bay, the inmate culture and mentality, and the findings of the federal court in Madrid v. Gomez, which addressed conditions in the SHU. The authors maintain that the mission of Pelican Bay, combined with the officer and inmate cultures, creates a self fulfilling prophecy: the super violent supermax.
Austin, J., & Irwin, J. (2001). It's about time: America's imprisonment binge (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
Bennis, W. (1997). Why leaders can't lead: The unconscious conspiracy continues. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
3.
Bottoms, A., Hay, W., & Sparks, J.R. (1990). Situational and social approaches to the prevention of disorder in long-term prisons. In T. Flanagan (Ed.), Long-term imprisonment: Policy science and correctional practice (pp. 186-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (1993). Institution profile. Sacramento : Author.
5.
Clemmer, D. (1958). The prison community. New York : Holt Rinehart.
6.
Crouch, B.M., & Marquart, J.W. (1989). An appeal to justice. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7.
Crouch, B.M., & Marquart, J.W. (1990). Resolving the paradox of reform litigation, prisoner violence, and perceptions of risk. Justice Quarterly, 7, 103-122.
8.
Duffee, D. (1975). The correctional officer subculture and organizational change. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 155-172.
9.
Farkas, M.A. (1997). The normative code among correctional officers: An exploration of components and functions. Journal of Crime and Delinquency, 20(1), 23-36.
10.
Gilbert, M.J. (1993, March). Discretionary workstyle preferences among correctional officers: Implications for correctional training and management . Paper presented at annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Kansas City, MO.
11.
Haney, C. (1993, Spring). Infamous punishment: The psychological consequences of isolation. The National Prison Project Journal , pp. 3-21.
12.
Haney, C., & Lynch, M. (1997). Regulating prisons of the future: A psychological analysis of supermax and solitary confinement. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 23, 477-570.
13.
Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford prison experiment. American Psychologist , 53(7), 709-727.
14.
Hawkins, G. (1976). The prison: Policy and practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Henslin, J. (1995). Sociology: A down to Earth approach (2nd ed.). Needham Heights: MA. Allyn & Bacon.
16.
Human Rights Watch. (2000). Briefing paper on supermaximum prisons. Retrieved October 30, 2001, from www.hrw.org
17.
Irwin, J. (1980). Prisons in turmoil. Boston : Little Brown.
18.
Jackson, M. (1983). Prisoners of isolation: Solitary confinement in Canada. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
19.
Johnson, R. (2002). Hard time (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
20.
Jones, J.E. (1981). The organizational universe. In J. E. Jones & W. J. Pfeiffer (Eds.), 1981 annual handbook for group facilitators (pp. 121-129). San Diego, CA: University Associates.
21.
Kummerlowe, C. (1995). Coping with imprisonment: A long-termer's view . In T. Flanagan (Ed.), Long-term imprisonment: Policy science and correctional practice (pp. 41-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
LIS, Inc. (1997, March). Supermax housing. Longmont, CO: National Institute of Corrections.
Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146 (N.D. Cal. 1995).
25.
Parenti, C. (2002). Rural prison as colonial masterZ Magazine. Retrieved November 4, 2001, from http://www.ZMag.org/
26.
O'Toole, J. (1996). Leading change: The argument for values based leadership. New York: Ballantine .
27.
Shakur, A.O. (1996). The Pelican Bay factor. Prison Legal News, 7(11), 4.
28.
Silverman, I. (2001). Corrections: A comprehensive view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
29.
Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Toch, H. (1988). Study and reducing stress. In R. Johnson and H.Toch (Eds.), The pains of imprisonment (pp. 25-44). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
31.
Toch, H. (1990). The good old days in the joint. In T. Flanagan (Ed.), Long-term imprisonment: Policy science and correctional practice (pp. 186-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Toch, H., & Klofas, J. (1982). Alienation and desire for job enrichment among correction officers. Federal Probation, 46, 35-44.
33.
Weinstein, C., & Cummins, E. (1996). The crime of punishment: Pelican Bay Maximum Security Prison. San Francisco: South End Press.
34.
Williams, V., & Fish, M. (1974). Convicts, codes, and contraband. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
