This research explores the sociopolitical context of prison violence and its control in the state of Illinois, and discusses the series of events that led to the opening of a supermax prison. Interrupted time series analyses were used to test whether the use of the supermax was associated with declines in prison violence, controlling for the potentially confounding influence of a systemwide effort to restructure the Illinois Department of Corrections following a prison scandal in 1996. There was no association between the opening of a supermax and inmate-on-inmate assaults; however, the supermax appears to have resulted in an abrupt, permanent reduction in assaults against staff. The opening of the supermax was also associated with an abrupt, permanent reduction in the use of lockdown days.
Barak-Glantz, I.L. (1983). Who's in the hole?Criminal Justice Review, 8, 29-37.
2.
Bottoms, A.E. (1999). Interpersonal violence and social order in prisons . In M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime and justice review: Vol. 26. Prisons (pp. 205-281). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., & Reinsel, G.C. (1994). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Briggs, C.S., Sundt, J.L., & Castellano, T.C. (2003). The effect of supermaximum security prisons on aggregate levels of institutional violence. Criminology, 41, 1341-1378.
5.
Chamlin, M.B. (1988). Crime and arrests: An autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 4, 247-258.
6.
Chamlin, M.B., Grasmick, H.G., Bursik, R.J., Jr., & Cochran, J.K. (1992). Time aggregation and time lag in macro-level deterrence research. Criminology, 30, 377-395.
7.
DiIulio, J.J. (1987). Governing prisons: A comparative study of correctional management. New York: Free Press .
8.
Estima. (2000). Regression analysis for time series (RATS, Version 5) [Computer software and manual]. Evanston, IL: Author.
9.
Flanagan, T.J. (1983). Correlates of institutional misconduct among state prisoners: A research note. Criminology, 21, 29-40.
10.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., Cullen, F.T., & Andrews, D.A. (2000, May). The effects of community sanctions and incarceration on recidivism. Forum on Corrections Research, 12, 10-13.
11.
Gendreau, P., & Keyes, D. (2001). Making prisons safer and more humane environments . Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43, 123-130.
12.
Glass, G.V., Wilson, V.L., & Gottman, J.M. (1975). Design and analysis of time series experiments . Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press.
13.
Griffin, M.L., & Hepburn, J.R. (2006). The effect of gang affiliation on violent misconduct among inmates during the early years of confinement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 419-448.
14.
Hallinan, J. (1995, December 10). Supermax prisons: They're supertough, superexensive and supergood for poor communities. The Sunday Patriot, p. G1.
15.
Haney, C. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary confinement and “supermax” confinement. Crime and Delinquency , 49, 124-156.
16.
Hewitt, J.D., Poole, E.D., & Regoli, R.M. (1984). Self-reported and observed rule breaking in prison: A look at disciplinary response. Justice Quarterly, 1, 437-447.
17.
Howard, C., Winfree, L.T., Jr., Mays, G.L., Stohr, M.K. & Clason, D.L. (1994). Processing inmate disciplinary infractions in a federal correctional institution: Legal and extra-legal correlates of prison-based legal decisions. The Prison Journal, 73, 5-31.
18.
Huebner, B.M. (2003). Administrative determinates of inmate violence: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 107-117.
19.
Illinois Department of Corrections. (1999, January). Perspectives: News for and about IDOC, 22(1), 9.
20.
Illinois Task Force on Crime and Corrections. ( 1993). Final report. Springfield: Author.
21.
Irwin, J. (2007). The warehouse prison: Disposal of the new dangerous class. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Irwin, J., & Austin, J. (1997). It's about time: America's imprisonment binge (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
23.
Jacobs, J.B. (1977). Stateville: The penitentiary in mass society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
King, R.D. (1999). The rise and rise of supermax: An American solution in search of a problem? Punishment and Society, 1, 163-185.
25.
King, R.D. (2001, September). Symposium conducted at the conference Best practices and human rights in supermax prisons: A dialogue, Seattle, WA. Unpublished manuscript.
26.
Kurki, L., & Morris, N. (2001). The purposes, practices, and problems of supermax prisons. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice review (Vol. 28, pp. 385-424.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Light, S.C. (1990). Measurement error in official statistics: Prison rule infraction data. Federal Probation, 54, 63-68.
28.
Lippke, R.L. (2004). Against supermax. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21, 109-124.
29.
Maghan, J. (1999). Dangerous inmates: Maximum security incarceration in the state prison systems of the United States. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4, 1-12.
30.
McCain, L.J., & McCleary, R. (1979). The statistical analysis of the simple interrupted time-series quasiexperiment. In T. D. Cook & D. T. Campbell (Eds.), Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings (pp. 233-293). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31.
McCleary, R., & Hay, R.A., Jr. (1980). Applied time series analysis for the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
McDowall, D., McCleary, R., Meidinger, E.E., & Hay, R.S., Jr. (1980). Interrupted time series analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
33.
Mears, D.P., & Castro, J.L. (2006). Warden's views on the wisdom of supermax prisons . Crime and Delinquency, 52, 398-431.
34.
Mears, D.P., & Reisig, M.D. (2006). The theory and practice of supermax prisons. Punishment and Society, 8, 33-57.
35.
Mears, D.P., & Watson, J. (2006). Towards a fair and balanced assessment of supermax prisons. Justice Quarterly, 23, 232-270.
36.
Nagin, D.S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 23, pp. 1-42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
National Institute of Corrections. (1997). Supermax housing: A survey of current practice (Special issues in corrections) . Longmont, CO: U.S. Department of Justice, Author.
38.
Ostrom, C.W., Jr. (1990). Time series analysis: Regression techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Pizarro, J.M., & Stenius, V.M.K. (2004). Supermax prisons: Their rise, current practices, and effect on inmates. The Prison Journal, 84, 248-264.
40.
Pizarro, J.M., Stenius, V.M.K., & Pratt, T.C. (2006). Supermax prisons: Myths, realities, and the politics of punishment inAmerican society. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 6-21.
41.
Poole, E.D., & Regoli, R.M. (1980). Race, institutional rule breaking, and disciplinary response: A study of discretionary decision making in prison. Law and Society Review, 14, 931-946.
42.
Ralph, P.H., & Marquart, J.W. (1991). Gang violence in Texas prisons. The Prison Journal, 71, 38-49.
43.
Rhodes, L.A. (2004). Total Confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
45.
Silberman, M. (1995). A world of violence: Corrections in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
46.
Toch, H. (2003). The contemporary relevance of early experiments with supermax reform. The Prison Journal, 83, 221-228.
47.
Toch, H., Adams, K.G., & Douglas, G.J. (1989). Coping: Maladaptation in prisons. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
48.
Useem, B., & Piehl, A. (2006). Prison buildup and disorder. Punishment and Society, 8, 87-115.
