As prison populations in the United States have soared over the last 30 years, offenders who are incarcerated for violating the conditions of their parole represent an increasingly large percentage of the overall population. Little is known, however, about who these offenders are, what they have done to be reincarcerated, or what factors make an offender more or less likely to succeed on parole. In this article, parole release data from the National Corrections Reporting Program are analyzed to identify individual-level predictors of parole success in four states and to assess the relative impact of demographic and legal factors on different offender groups (by race).
Albonetti, C.A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
2.
Burke, P. (1997). Policy-driven responses to probation and parole violations. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Effective Public Policy.
3.
Caplow, T., & Simon, J. (1999). Understanding prison policy and population trends . In M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons: Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 26). Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
4.
Clarke, S., Yuan-Huei, W.L., & Wallace, W.L. (1988). Probation and recidivism in North Carolina: Measurement and classification of risk. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Institute of Government.
5.
Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449-474.
6.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
7.
Hughes, T., Wilson, D.J., & Beck, A.J. (2001). Trends in state parole, 1990—2000. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
8.
Irish, J. (1989). Probation and recidivism. Mineola, NY: Nassau County Probation Department.
9.
Kalven, H., Jr., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.
10.
Kassebaum, G. (1999). Survival on parole: A study of post-prison adjustment and the risk of returning to prison in the state of Hawaii. Honolulu: Social Science Research Institute and Department of the Attorney General State of Hawaii.
11.
Kassebaum, G., & Davidson-Corondo, J. (2001). Parole decision making in Hawaii: Setting minimum terms, approving release, deciding on revocation, and predicting success and failure on parole. Honolulu : Social Science Research Institute and Department of the Attorney General State of Hawaii.
12.
Knapp, K. (1993). Allocation of discretion and accountability within sentencing structures. University of Colorado Law Review, 64, 679-705.
13.
Langan, P., & Levin, D. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
14.
Messinger, S., & Berecochea, J. (1992, June). Don't stay too long but do come back soon: Reflections on the size and vicissitudes of California's parole population. Paper presented at California Conference on Growth and Its Impact on Correctional Policy, University of California at Berkeley.
15.
Petersilia, J. (1985). Granting felons probation: Public risks and alternatives . Crime and Delinquency, 31, 379-392.
16.
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Simon, J. (1993). Poor discipline: Parole and the social control of the underclass, 1890-1990. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Spohn, C., & Cederblom, J. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 8, 305-327.
19.
Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (2000). When does race matter? An analysis of the conditions under which race affects sentence severity. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, 2, 3-37.
20.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J.H. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 762-798.
21.
Travis, J., & Lawrence, S. (2002). Beyond the prison gates: The state of parole in America. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Center.
22.
Unnever, J.D., & Hembroff, L.A. (1988). The prediction of racial/ethnic sentencing disparities: An expectation states approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 53-82.
