Substance abuse is common among probationers, and treatment programs have become an integral part of community corrections. The current study presents findings from a modified therapeutic community (TC) serving drug abusing probationers in a large metropolitan area. Findings show that treatment dropouts were more likely to be rearrested for a serious felony within 2 years of leaving the TC program than were treatment graduates and probationers from an untreated comparison group. Also, a significantly smaller proportion of graduates were rearrested during the 2nd year after release compared to those who drop out of treatment or who do not receive treatment. Logistic regression analysis that adjusted for pre-existing group differences suggests there was a small impact of the TC program on recidivism, with treatment graduates only slightly less likely to be arrested within 2 years of leaving the program.
Abram, K. M., & Teplin, L. A. (1991). Co-occurring disorders among mentally ill jail detainees. American Psychologist, 46, 1036-1045.
2.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed metaanalysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
3.
Barthwell, A. G., Bokos, P., Bailey, J., Haser, N., Nisenbaum, M., Devereux, J., et al. (1995). Interventions/Wilmer: A continuum of care for substance abusers in the criminal justice system. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 27(1), 39-47.
4.
Brochu, S., Bergeron, J., Landry, M., Germain, M., & Schneeberger, P. (2002). The impact of treatment on criminalized substance addicts. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 21(3), 23-41.
5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999a). Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers (NCJ-174463). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999b). Prior abuse reported by inmates and probationers (NCJ-172879). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999c). Substance abuse and treatment, state and federal prisoners, 1997 (NCJ-172871). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
8.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Corrections facts at a glance: The number of adults in the correctional population has been increasing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved February 17, 2006, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/corr2.htm
9.
Butzin, C. A., Martin, S. S., & Inciardi, J. A. (2002). Evaluating component effects of a prisonbased treatment continuum. Journal of Substance Treatment, 22, 63-69.
10.
Field, G. (1985). The Cornerstone program: A client outcome study. Federal Probation, 49, 50-55.
11.
Field, G. (1989). The effects of intensive treatment on reducing the criminal recidivism of addicted offenders. Federal Probation, 53(10), 51-56.
12.
Field, G. (1992). Oregon prison drug treatment programs. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.),Drug abuse treatment in prisons and jails (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 118, Department of Health and Human Services Publication No. ADM 92-1884). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
13.
Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 144-161.
14.
Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., Devereux, J., & Hathcoat, M. (1996). Posttreatment outcomes for substance-abusing probationers mandated to residential treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 28(3), 291-296.
15.
Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., Leukefeld, C. G., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Motivation as a predictor of engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(1), 56-75.
16.
Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., Rao, S. R., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Assessing and evaluating mandated correctional substance abuse treatment. In C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims, & D. Farabee (Eds.),Clinical and policy responses to drug offenders (pp. 41-56). New York: Springer.
17.
Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., & Simpson, D. D. (1999). Prison-based substance abuse treatment, residential aftercare, and recidivism. Addiction, 94(6), 833-842.
18.
Hiller, M. L., Webster, J. M., Narevic, E., Staton, M., Garrity, T. F., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2005). Prisoners with substance abuse and mental health problems: Health and health services utilization. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31, 1-20.
19.
Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., & Butzin, C. A. (2004). Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release for prison. Crime and Delinquency, 50, 88-107.
20.
Inciardi, J. A., Surratt, H. L., Martin, S. S., & Hooper, R. M. (2002). The importance of aftercare in a corrections-based treatment continuum. In C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims, & D. Farabee (Eds.),Clinical and policy responses to drug offenders (pp. 204-216). New York: Springer.
21.
Knight, K., & Hiller, M. L. (1997). Community-based substance abuse treatment for probationers: 1-year outcome evaluation of the Dallas County Judicial Treatment Center. Federal Probation61(2), 61-68.
22.
Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., Chatham, L. R., & Camacho, L. M. (1997). An assessment of prison-based drug treatment: Texas’ in-prison therapeutic community program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 24(3/4), 75-100.
23.
Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., & Hiller, M. L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. The Prison Journal, 79(3), 337-351.
24.
Lipton, D. S. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision (National Criminal Justice No. 157642). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
25.
Lockwood, D., Inciardi, J. A., & Surratt, H. L. (1997). Crest outreach center: A model for blending treatment and corrections. In F. M. Tims, J. A. Inciardi, B. W. Fletcher, & A. M. Horton, Jr. (Eds.),The effectiveness of innovative approaches in the treatment of drug abuse (pp. 70-82). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
26.
Lowe, L., Wexler, H. K., & Peters, J. (1998). The R. J. Donovan in-prison and community substance abuse program: Three-year return-to-custody data. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Corrections, Office of Substance Abuse Programs.
27.
Martin, S., Butzin, C., Saum, C., & Inciardi, J. (1999). Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare. The Prison Journal, 79, 294-320.
28.
National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (1998, January). Behind bars: Substance abuse and America's prison population. New York: Author.
29.
Pearson, F. S., & Lipton, D. S. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of correctionsbased treatments for drug abuse. The Prison Journal, 79(4), 384-410.
30.
Peters, R. H., Greenbaum, P. E., Edens, J. F., Carter, C. R., & Ortiz, M. M. (1998). Prevalence of DSM-IV substance abuse and dependence disorders among prison inmates. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 24(4), 573-587.
31.
Petersilia, J. (1995). A crime control rationale for reinvesting in community corrections. The Prison Journal, 75, 479-496.
32.
Petersilia, J. (1997). Probation in the United States. In M. Tonry (Ed.),Crime and justice: A review of research(Vol. 22, pp. 149-200). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Petersilia, J. (1998). Probation in the United States. Perspectives: The Journal of the American Probation and Parole Association, 22(2), 30-41.
34.
Prendergast, M. L., Hall, E. A., Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., & Cao, Y. (2004). Amity prisonbased therapeutic community: 5-year outcomes. The Prison Journal, 84, 36-60.
35.
Rawlings, B. (1999). Therapeutic communities in prisons: A research review. Therapeutic Communities, 20, 177-193.
36.
Simpson, D. D., Wexler, H. K., & Inciardi, J. A. (Eds.). (1999a). Special issue: Drug treatment outcomes for correctional settings. Part 1. The Prison Journal, 79(3).
37.
Simpson, D. D., Wexler, H. K., & Inciardi, J. A. (Eds.). (1999b). Special issue: Drug treatment outcomes for correctional settings. Part 2. The Prison Journal, 79(4).
38.
Teplin, L. A. (1990). The prevalence of severe mental disorder among male urban jail detainees: Comparison with the epidemiologic catchment area program. American Journal of Public Health, 80(6), 663-669.
39.
Teplin, L. A. (1994). Psychiatric and substance abuse disorders among male urban jail detainees. American Journal of Public Health, 84(2), 290-293.
40.
Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., & Lipton, D. S. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 71-92.
41.
Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., Lipton, D. S., & Rosenblum, A. B. (1992). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.),Drug abuse treatment in prisons and jails (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 118, DHHS Publication No. ADM 92-1884). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
42.
Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Lowe, L., & Peters, J. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. The Prison Journal, 79(3), 321-336.
43.
Wexler, H. K., & Williams, R. (1986). The Stay’n Out therapeutic community: Prison treatment for substance abusers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 18(3), 221-230.
