Elements from differential association and importation theory were incorporated into a contextual model to explain drug abuse inside prison. Data came from self-administered questionnaires given to more than 1,000 inmates in 30 different correctional institutions throughout Kentucky, Tennessee, and Ohio. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine the impact of correctional context on individual behavior. Results indicated that drug abuse inside prison varies across different correctional institutions. The effect of prior street-drug use on drug abuse in prison also varied across contexts. Moreover, an aggregate measure of crowding explained both drug abuse in prison as well as the effect of prior street-drug use on substance abuse in prison.
Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern.
2.
Alarid, L. F., Burton, V. S., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). Gender and crime among felony offenders: Assessing the generality of social control and differential association theories. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 171-199.
3.
Bachman, R., & Paternoster, R. (1997). Statistical methods for criminology and criminal justice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Benda, B. B. (1994). Testing competing theoretical concepts: Adolescent alcohol consumption. Deviant Behavior, 15, 375-396.
5.
Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14, 128-146.
6.
Burton, V. S., Cullen, F. T., Evans, D. T., & Dunaway, G. R. (1994). Reconsidering strain theory: Operationalization, rival theories, and adult criminality. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 213-239.
7.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Centre for Multilevel Modeling Team. (2001). MLwiN (Version 1.10.0007) [Computer software]. London: Centre for Multilevel Modeling.
9.
Cope, N. (2000). Drug use in prison: The experience of young offenders. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 7, 355-366.
10.
Cox, V. C., Paulus, P. B., & McCain, G. (1984). Prison crowding research: The relevance for prison housing standards and a general approach regarding crowding phenomena. American Psychologist, 39, 1148-1160.
11.
Edwards, A., Curtis, S., & Sherrard, J. (1999). Survey of risk behaviour and HIV prevalence in an English prison. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 10, 464-466.
12.
Farrington, D. P., & Nuttall, C. P. (1980). Prison size, overcrowding, prison violence, and recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 221-231.
13.
Gillespie, W. (2003). Prisonization: Individual and institutional factors affecting inmate conduct. New York: LFB Scholarly.
14.
Glaser, D. (1956). Criminality theories and behavioral images. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 433-444.
15.
Goldstein, P. J. (1998). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. In J.A. Inciardi & K. McElrath (Eds.), The American drug scene (pp. 243-253). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
16.
Gravett, S. (2000). Drugs in prison: A practitioner’s guide. London: Continuum.
17.
Heimer, K., & Matsueda, R. (1994). Role-taking, role commitment, and delinquency: A theory of differential social control. American Sociological Review, 59, 365-390.
18.
Inciardi, J. A., Lockwood, D., & Quinlan, J. A. (1993). Drug use in prison: Patterns, processes, and implications for treatment. The Journal of Drug Issues, 23, 119-129.
19.
Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Jones, W. H., & Lang, J. R. (1980). Sample composition bias and nonresponse bias in a mail survey: A comparison of inducement methods. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 69-76.
21.
Kandel, D., & Davies, M. (1991). Friendship networks, intimacy, and illicit drug use in young adulthood: A comparison of two competing theories. Criminology, 29, 441-469.
22.
Kassebaum, G., & Chandler, S. M. (1994). Polydrug use and self control among men and women in prisons. Journal of Drug Education, 24, 333-350.
23.
Keene, J. (1997). Drug use among prisoners before, during and after custody. Addiction Research, 4, 343-353.
24.
Kreft, I., & deLeeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Labovitz, S. (1967). Some observations on measurement and statistics. Social Forces, 46, 151-160.
26.
Leukefeld, C. G., & Tims, F. R. (1993). Drug abuse treatment in prisons and jails. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 10, 77-84.
27.
Marcos, A. C., Bahr, S. J., & Johnson, R. E. (1986). Test of bonding/association theory of adolescent drug use. Social Forces, 65, 135-161.
28.
Matsueda, R. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach. American Sociology Review, 47, 489-504.
29.
Matsueda, R., & Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36, 269-308.
30.
McAuliffe, W. E., Geller, S., LaBrie, R., Paletz, S., & Fournier, E. (1998). Are telephone surveys suitable for studying substance abuse? Cost, administration, coverage, and response rate issues. Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 455-482.
31.
McGee, Z. T. (1992). Social class differences in parental and peer influence on adolescent drug use. Deviant Behavior, 13, 349-372.
32.
Megargee, E. I. (1977). The association of population density, reduced space, and uncomfortable temperatures with misconduct in a prison community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 5, 289-298.
33.
Menard, S., Mihalic, S., & Huizinga, D. (2001). Drugs and crime revisited. Justice Quarterly, 18, 269-299.
34.
Parker, R. N., & Auerhahn, K. (1998). Alcohol, drugs, and violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 291-311.
35.
Ray, J. J., & Still, L. V. (1987). Maximizing the response-rate in surveys may be a mistake. Personality & Individual Differences, 8, 571-573.
36.
Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
37.
Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. F. (1992). Principles of criminology (11th ed.). Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
38.
Swann, R., & James, P. (1998). The effect of the prison environment upon inmate drug taking behaviour. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 252-265.
39.
Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 22, 664-670.
40.
Thomas, C. W., & Cage, R. J. (1977). Correlates of prison drug use: An evaluation of two conceptual models. Criminology, 15, 193-210.
41.
Tittle, C. R., Burke, M. J., & Jackson, E. F. (1986). Modeling Sutherland’s theory of differential association: Toward an empirical clarification. Social Forces, 65, 405-432.
42.
Wilcox Rountree, P., & Land, K. C. (1996). Perceived risk versus fear of crime: Empirical evidence of conceptually distinct reactions in survey data. Social Forces, 74, 1353-1376.
43.
Wooldredge, J., Griffin, T., & Pratt, T. (2001). Considering hierarchical models for research on inmate behavior: Predicting misconduct with multilevel data. Justice Quarterly, 18, 203-231.
