This study explored possible predictors of participation in aftercare and 12-month return-to-custody (RTC) among 4,155 inmates who participated in prison-based therapeutic community treatment in California. The most consistent theme that emerged from this study was the importance of duration of time spent in treatment. Increased time spent in prison-based treatment predicted increased participation in aftercare and decreased 12-month RTC. Similarly, increased time spent in aftercare predicted decreased 12-month RTC. Those who participated in aftercare in urban counties spent longer periods of time in treatment and were less likely to be returned to custody within 12 months. The findings suggest that Hispanics rely more successfully on social and/or familial support systems than on aftercare postrelease. The findings also highlight the importance of education in facilitating postrelease reintegration and ensuring successful outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Broome, K. M., Knight, K., Joe, G. W., & Simpson, D. D. (1996). Evaluating the drug-abusing probationer: Clinical interview versus self-administered assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(4), 593-606.
De La Rosa, M. R., & White, M. S. (2001). A review of the role of social support systems in the drug use behavior of Hispanics. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 33(3), 233-240.
4.
De Leon, G., Melnick, G., Kressel, D., & Jainchill, N. (2000). Circumstance, motivation, readiness, and suitability (the CMRS scales): Predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 20(4) 495-515.
5.
Farabee, D., & Fredlund, E. (1996). Self-reported drug use among recently admitted jail inmates: Estimating prevalence and treatment needs. Substance Use & Abuse, 31(4), 423-435.
6.
Field, G. (1998). From the institution to the community. Corrections Today, 60, 6, 94-97, 113.
7.
Gossop, M., Marsden, J., Stewart, D., & Rolfe, A. (1999). Treatment retention and 1 year outcomes for residential programmes in England. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57(2), 89-98.
8.
Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., Leukefeld, C., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 29(1), 56-75.
9.
Inciardi, J. A. (1996). The therapeutic community: An effective model for corrections-based drug abuse treatment. In K. Early (Ed.), Drug treatment behind bars: Prison based strategies for change. Westport, CT: Praeger.
10.
Joe, G. W., Simpson, D. D., & Broome, K. M. (1998). Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction, 93(8), 1177-1190.
11.
Knight, K., Holcom, M., & Simpson, D. D. (1994). TCU psychosocial functioning and motivation scales: Manual on psychometric properties. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research.
12.
Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., Hiller, & M. L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. Prison Journal, 79(3), 337-351.
13.
Lipton, D. S. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision (NIJ Research report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
14.
Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Saum, C. A., & Inciardi, J. A. (1999). Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare. Prison Journal, 79(3), 294-320.
15.
Melnick, G., De Leon, G., Thomas, G., Kressel, D., & Wexler, H. K. (2001). Treatment process in prison therapeutic communities: Motivation, participation, and outcome. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27(4), 633-650.
16.
Prendergast, M. L., Wellisch, J., & Wong, M. (1996). Residential treatment for women parolees following prison drug treatment: Treatment experiences, needs and services, outcomes. Prison Journal, 76(3), 253-274.
17.
Simpson, D. D. (2001). Modeling treatment process and outcomes. Addiction, 96, 207-211.
18.
Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., Rowan-Szal, G. A., & Greener, J. M. (1997). Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14(6), 565-572.
19.
Warner, B. D., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2001). Rural-urban differences in substance use and treatment utilization among prisoners. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27(2), 265-280.
20.
Westhuis, D. J., Gwaltney, L., & Hayashi, R. (2001). Outpatient cocaine abuse treatment: Predictors of success. Journal of Drug Education, 31(2), 171-183.
21.
Wexler, H. K. (1996). The Amity prison TC evaluation: Inmate profiles and reincarceration outcomes. Presentation at the California Department of Corrections, Youth and Adult Correctional Agency, Sacramento, November 1996.
22.
Wexler, H. K., De Leon, G., Kressel, D., & Peters, J. (1999). The amity prison TC evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(2), 147-167.
23.
Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., & Lipton, D. S. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 71-92.
24.
Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., Lipton, D. S., & Rosenblum, A. B. (1992). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment in prisons and jails (NIDA Research Monograph 118, DHHS Pub No. [ADM] 92-1884, pp. 156-175) Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
25.
Wexler, H., & Love, C. (1994). Therapeutic communities in prison. In F. Tims, G. De Leon, & N. Jainchill (Eds.), Therapeutic community: Advances in research and application (NIDA Research Monograph Series 144, pp. 181-208). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
26.
Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Lowe, L., & Peters, J. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. Prison Journal, 79(3), 312-336.
