Comparing the Quality of Confinement and Cost-Effectiveness of Public Versus Private Prisons: What We Know,Why We Do Not Know More,and Where to Go from Here
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online September, 2003
Comparing the Quality of Confinement and Cost-Effectiveness of Public Versus Private Prisons: What We Know,Why We Do Not Know More,and Where to Go from Here
The movement to privatize correctional institutions has gained considerable momentum as the need to reduce the costs of incarceration to public agencies has become more critical. The empirical evidence regarding whether private prisons are more cost-effective and whether they provide a higher quality of confinement to inmates, however, is inconclusive. To help clarify this portion of the prison privatization debate, this article contains a systematic review of the evaluation literature comparing the costs and quality of confinement of public versus private prisons. In doing so, three issues are highlighted: (a) the conclusions that can be reached based on the existing literature,(b) the major methodological inconsistencies that have hindered researchers' ability to draw firm conclusions from the body of empirical studies thus far, and (c) the direction that future research in this area may take to advance a better understanding of the potential advantages and disadvantages of prison privatization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, P., Davoli, C. R., & Moriarty, L. (1985). Private corrections: Feast or fiasco? The Prison Journal, 65, 32-41.
2.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
3.
Archambeault, W. G., & Deis, D. R. (1996, December). Cost-effectiveness comparisons of private versus public prisons in Louisiana: A comprehensive analysis of Allen, Avoyelles, and Winn Correctional Centers (Executive Summary). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University, School of Social Work.
4.
Austin, J., & Coventry, G. (1999). Emerging issues on privatized prisons. Washington, DC: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
5.
Beck, A. J., & Karberg, J. C. (2001, March). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2000 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
6.
Bowditch, C., & Everett, R. S. (1987). Private prisons: Problems with the solution. Justice Quarterly, 4, 441-453.
7.
Brister, R. C. (1996). Changing of the guard: A case for privatization of Texas prisons. The Prison Journal, 76, 310-330.
8.
Camp, S. D. (1999). Do inmate survey data reflect prison conditions? Using surveys to assess prison conditions of confinement. The Prison Journal, 79, 250-268.
9.
Camp, S. D., & Gaes, G. G. (1998, October). Private adult prisons: What we know and how we can know more, monograph. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Information, Policy, and Public Affairs Division.
10.
Camp, S. D., Saylor, W. G., & Wright, K. N. (1999). Creating performance measures from survey data: A practical discussion. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3, 71-80.
11.
Colson, C. (1989). Alternatives to reduce prison crowding. Journal of State Government, 62, 59-94.
Cox, N. R., & Osterhoff, W. E. (1993). The public-private partnership: A challenge and an opportunity for corrections. In G. Bowman, S. Hakim, & P. Seidenstat (Eds.), Privatizing correctional institutions (pp. 113-129). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
14.
Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000 (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
15.
DiIulio, J. J. (1987). Governing prisons: A comparative study of correctional management.New York: Free Press.
16.
DiIulio, J. J. (1991). No escape: The future of American corrections. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Drowota, C. (1995). Comparative evaluation of privately-managed CCA prisons (South Central Correctional Center) and state-managed prototypical prisons (Northeast Correctional Center, Northwest Correctional Center) (Executive Summary). Nashville, TN: Select Oversight Committee on Corrections, Tennessee Assembly.
18.
Durham, A. M. (1989). The privatization of punishment: Justification, expectations, and experience. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3, 48-73.
19.
Geis, G., Mobley, A., & Shichor, D. (1999). Private prisons, criminological research, and conflict of interest: A case study. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 372-388.
20.
General Accounting Office. (1996). Private and public prisons: Studies comparing operational costs and/or quality of service. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
Harding, R. (1998). Evaluating private prisons: A reply. The Australian Journal of Criminology, 31, 314-320.
22.
Harland, A. (1997). Editorial introduction. The Prison Journal, 77, 3-5.
23.
Henig, J. R. (1985). Privatization and decentralization: Should governments shrink? Public Policy and Federalism, 12, 26-53.
Lanza-Kaduce, L., Parker, K. F., & Thomas, C. W. (2000). The devil in the details: The case against the case study of private prisons, criminological research and conflict of interest. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 92-136.
26.
Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. (1998). The importance of evaluating correctional programs: Assessing outcome and quality. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 22-29.
27.
Lilly, R. J., & Deflem, M. (1996). Profit and reality: An analysis of the corrections commercial complex. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 3-20.
28.
Lilly, R. J., & Knepper, P. (1993). The corrections-commercial complex. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 150-166.
29.
Lipsey, M. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cooket al. (Eds.), Meta-Analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage.
30.
Logan, C. H. (1987). The propriety of prisons. Federal Probation, 51, 35-40.
31.
Logan, C. H. (1990). Private prisons: Cons and pros. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Logan, C. H. (1992). Well-kept: Comparing quality of confinement in private and public prisons. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 575-613.
33.
Logan, C. H. (1996). Public vs. private prison management: A case comparison. Criminal Justice Review, 21, 62-85.
34.
MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 457-471.
35.
Maxfield, M. G., & Babbie, E. (1998). Research methods for criminal justice and criminology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36.
McConville, S. (1987). Aid from industry? Private corrections and prison crowding. In S. Gottfredson & S. McConville (Eds.), America's correctional crisis: Prison populations and public policy (pp. 221-242). New York: Greenwood.
37.
McDonald, D. C. (1989). The cost of corrections: In search of the bottom line. Research In Corrections, 2, 1-26.
38.
Mitchell, G. A. (1996, December). Controlling prison costs in Wisconsin (Report No. 9). Thiensville: Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, Inc.
39.
Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (1998, April). Review of Bay Correctional Facility and Moore Haven Correctional Facility (Report No. 97-68). Tallahassee, FL: Author.
40.
Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (2000, March). South Bay Correctional Facility provides savings and success: Room for improvement (Private Prison Review Report No. 99-39). Tallahassee, FL: Author.
41.
Ogle, R. S. (1999). Prison privatization: An environmental catch-22. Justice Quarterly, 16, 579-600.
42.
Palmer, T. (1992). The re-emergence of correctional intervention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Petersilia, J. (1996). Improving corrections policy: The importance of researchers and practitioners working together. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 223-231). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Pratt, T. C., & Maahs, J. (1999). Are private prisons more cost-effective than public prisons? A meta-analysis of evaluation research studies. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 358-371.
45.
Reisig, M. D. (1998). Rates of disorder in higher-custody state prisons: A comparative analysis of managerial practices. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 229-244.
46.
Reisig, M. D., & Pratt, T. C. (2000). The ethics of correctional privatization: A critical examination of the delegation of coercive authority. The Prison Journal, 80, 210-222.
47.
Schiraldi, V., & Greene, J. (2002, February). Cutting correctly: New state policies for times of austerity (Policy Report). Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
48.
Sechrest, D. K., & Shichor, D. (1996). Comparing public and private correctional facilities in California: An exploratory study. In G. L. Mays & T. Gray (Eds.), Privatization and the provision of correctional services: Context and consequences (pp. 133-151). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
49.
Sellers, M. P. (1989). Private and public prisons: A comparison of costs, programs and facilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 33, 241-256.
50.
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
51.
Shichor, D. (1993). The corporate context of private prisons. Crime, Law and Social Change, 20, 113-138.
52.
Shichor, D. (1995). Punishment for profit: Private prisons/public concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Steelman, S., & Harms, K. (1986). Construction management firms—saving time and money. Corrections Today, 48, 64-66.
54.
Texas Sunset Advisory Commission. (1990, December). Contracts for correctional facilities and services (Staff Report to the Sunset Advisory Commission). Austin, TX: Author.
55.
Thomas, C. W. (1997, August). Comparing the cost and performance of public and private prisons in Arizona, monograph. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Corrections.
56.
Thomas, C. W. (2001, September). Private Adult Correctional Facility Census: A “real-time” statistical profile. Available from http://web.crim.ufl.edu/pcp/census/2001/
57.
Urban Institute. (1985, August). Comparison of privately and publicly operated corrections facilities in Kentucky and Massachusetts, project report. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
Useem, B., & Reisig, M. D. (1999). Collective action in prisons: Protests, disturbances, and riots. Criminology, 37, 735-760.
Van Voorhis, P. (1994). Measuring prison disciplinary problems: A multiple indicators approach to understanding prison adjustment. Justice Quarterly, 11, 679-709.
61.
Vardalis, J. J., & Becker, F. W. (2000). Legislative opinions concerning the private operation of state prisons: The case of Florida. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 136-148.
Winn, R. G. (1996). Ideology and the calculation of efficiency in public and private correctional enterprise. In G. L. Mays & T. Gray (Eds.), Privatization and the provision of correctional services: Context and consequences (pp. 21-30). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
