Prison conditions similar to those of supermax prisons have been instituted on several occasions in the past, in the course of early experiments with prison design. In several instances, supermax-like conditions were abandoned because pre/postintervention data demonstrated that social isolation and enforced inactivity could produce symptoms of mental illness, which could be ameliorated when confinement conditions were relaxed. Such experiences carry implications for current correctional administrators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Goord, G. S. (2000, November). Commissioner's policy paper on prison safety and inmate programming. Albany, NY: Department of Correction Services.
2.
Gray, F. C. (1973). Prison discipline in America. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith. (Original work published 1847)
3.
Haney, C., & Lynch, M. (1997). Regulating prisons of the future: A psychological analysis of supermax and solitary confinement. New York Review of Law and Social Change, 23, 477-570.
4.
Kupers, T. (1999). Prison madness: The mental health crisis behind bars and what we must do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Kurki, L., & Morris, N. (2001). The purposes, practices, and problems of supermax prisons. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research, volume 28 (pp. 385-424). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Miller, M. (2002, January 3). Supermax will get overhaul. Madison Capital Times, pp. 1A-3A.
7.
Toch, H. (2001). The future of supermax confinement. The Prison Journal, 81, 376-388.
