Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The relationship between correctional officer attitudes toward inmates and official reporting of major and minor institutional rule violations is examined. Factor analysis of correctional officer responses to the Klofas-Toch Measure of Professional Orientation produced two dimensions of officer attitude toward inmates: Human Service Orientation (HSO) and Social Distance (SD). HSO reflects belief in rehabilitation activities. SD reflects the preference for adopting a personal, informal, supervisory relationship with inmates. SD was the only dimension that predicted rule violation reporting. Officers who preferred high SD filed a higher number of minor misconduct reports than officers who preferred low SD. Neither dimension predicted the filing of major misconduct reports. Race and gender did not predict rule violation reporting. The relationship between officer education and preference for SD was unexpected, as was the relationship between years of service and SD. Inmate responses to discretionary rule enforcement might be negative. The influence of SD in rule violation reporting should be included in correctional training curricula.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Bar Association. (1974). Survey of prison disciplinary practices and procedures. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.

Crouch, B. M., & Alpert, P. (1982). Sex and occupational socialization among prison guards: A longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 316-329.

Cullen, F. T., Link, B. G., Wolfe, N. T., & Frank, J. (1985). The social dimensions of correctional officer stress. Justice Quarterly, 2, 505-533.

Farmer, R. E. (1977). Cynicism: A factor in corrections work. Journal of Criminal Justice, 5, 237-246.

Festinger, L. A. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Harper & Row.

Flanagan, T.J. (1983). Correlates of institutional misconduct among state prisoners: A research note. Criminology, 21, 29-40.

Flanagan, T.J. (1996). Discipline. In M. D. McShane & F. P. Williams, III (Eds.), Encyclopedia of American prisons (pp. 161-164). New York: Garland.

Harvard Center for Criminal Justice. (1972). Judicial intervention in prison discipline. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 63, 200-228.

Hawkins, D. (1986). Race, crime type and imprisonment. Justice Quarterly, 3, 251-269.

10.

Held, B. S., Levine, D., & Swartz, V. D. (1979, March). Interpersonal aspects of dangerousness. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 6(1), 49-58.

11.

Hewitt, J. D., Poole, E. D., & Regoli, R. M. (1984). Self-reported and observed rule-breaking in prison: A look at disciplinary response. Justice Quarterly, 3, 437-448.

12.

Jenne, D. L., & Kersting, R. C. (1998). Gender, power, and reciprocity in the correctional setting. Prison Journal, 2(78), 166-185.

13.

Jurik, N. C. (1985). Individual and organizational determinants of correctional officer attitudes toward inmates. Criminology, 23, 523-539.

14.

Klein, S., Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1990). Race and imprisonment decisions in California. Science, 247, 812-816.

15.

Klofas, J. M., & Toch, H. (1982, July). The guard subculture myth. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19(2), 23.

16.

Lindquist, C. A., & Whitehead, J. T. (1986, Summer). Burnout, job stress and job satisfaction among Southern correctional officers: Perceptions and causal factors. Journal of Offender Counseling, 10(4).

17.

Marquart, J. W. (1986). Prison guards and the use of physical coercion as a mechanism of prisoner control. Criminology, 24, 347-366.

18.

McClellan, D. S. (1994). Disparity in the discipline of male and female inmates in Texas prisons. Women and Criminal Justice, 5(2), 71-97.

19.

Melvin, K. B., Gramling, L., & Gardner, W. (1985). A scale to measure attitudes toward prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(2), 241-253.

20.

Petersen, D., & Friday, P. (1975). Early release from incarceration: Race as a factor in the use of shock probation. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 66, 79.

21.

Pollock, J. M. (1986). Sex and supervision: Guarding male and female inmates. New York: Greenwood Press.

22.

Pollock-Byrne (1990). Women, prison, and crime. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

23.

Poole, E. D., & Regoli, R. M. (1980). Race, institutional rule breaking, and disciplinary response: A study of discretionary decision making in prison. Law and Society Review, 14(4), 931-945.

24.

Pound, R. (1960). Discretion, dispensation, and mitigation: The problem of the individual special case. New York University Law Review, 35, 9-25.

25.

Stephan, J. (1989, December). Prison rule violators. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

26.

Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

27.

Toch, H. (1978, Fall). Is a “correctional officer,” by any other name, a “screw?”Criminal Justice Review, 3(2), 199-235.

28.

Whitehead, J. T., & Lindquist, C. A. (1986, February). Correctional officers' job burnout: A path model. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23(1), 23-42.

29.

Whitehead, J., Linquist, C., & Klofas, J. (1987, December). Correctional officer professional orientation: A replication of the Klofas-Toch measure. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14(4), 468-486.

30.

Whitehead, J. T., & Lindquist, C. A. (1989, March). Determinants of correctional officers professional orientation. Justice Quarterly, 6(1), 69-87.

31.

Wilbanks, W. (1987). The myth of a racist criminal justice System. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

32.

Wright, K. N., & Saylor, W. G. (1991). Male and female employee perceptions of prison work: Is there a difference?Justice Quarterly, 8, 505-524.

33.

Zimmer, L. E. (1987). How women reshape the prison guard role. Gender and Society, 35, 64-77.

34.

Zimring, F. (1981). Making the punishment fit the crime. In R. Culbertson & M. Tezak (Eds.), Order under law (pp. 180-190). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

35.

Zupan, L. (1986). Gender-related differences in correctional officers' perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 349-361.

Social Distance and Discretionary Rule Enforcement in a Women's Prison

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References