For three decades, American correctional policy has focused on “getting tough” with offenders, and recent innovations continue this trend. It is unclear, however, that the public desires such a singularly punitive approach to crime. This study reports results from a statewide, contemporary assessment of citizens' attitudes toward rehabilitation. The results indicate that the public still believes that rehabilitation should be an integral part of correctional policy. Furthermore, support for a treatment approach is fairly consistent across demographic groups and across different types of questions used to tap citizens' views. The policy implications of these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alabama to make prisoners break rocks. (1995, July 29). The New York Times, p. 5.
2.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
3.
Applegate, B. K. (1997). Specifying public support for rehabilitation: A factorial survey approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
4.
Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., Turner, M. G., & Sundt, J. L. (1996). Assessing public support for three-strikes-and-you're-out laws: Global versus specific attitudes. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 517-534.
5.
Barrum, J. A., Henningsen, R. J., & Young, J. P. (1983). Community based corrections. Huntsville, TX: Criminal Justice Center, Sam Houston State University.
6.
Bragg, R. (1995, March 26). Chain gangs to return to roads of Alabama: State hopes revival will deter crime. The New York Times, p. Y9.
7.
Brandl, S. G., Frank, J., Worden, R. E., & Bynum, T. S. (1994). Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship. Justice Quarterly, 11, 119-134.
8.
Brown, E. J., Flanagan, T. J., & McLeod, M. (Eds.). (1984). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1983. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
9.
Brown, M. P., & Elrod, P. (1995). Electronic house arrest: An examination of citizen attitudes. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 332-346.
10.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1996). Correctional populations in the United States, 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
Clear, T. R. (1994). Harm in American penology: Offenders, victims, and their communities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
Cohen, A. (1995, May 15). Back on the chain gang. Time, p. 26.
13.
Cullen, F. T. (1995). Assessing the penal harm movement. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 338-358.
14.
Cullen, F. T., & Gilbert, K. E. (1982). Reaffirming Rehablilitation. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
15.
Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., Cullen, J. B., & Mathers, R. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305-331.
16.
Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., & Wozniak, J. F. (1985). Explaining the get tough movement: Can the public be blamed?Federal Probation, 49, 16-24.
17.
Cullen, F. T., Cullen, J. B., & Wozniak, J. F. (1988). Is rehabilitation dead? The myth of the punitive public. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 303-317.
18.
Cullen, F. T., Golden, K. M., & Cullen, J. B. (1983). Is child saving dead? Attitudes toward juvenile rehabilitation in Illinois. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 1-13.
19.
Cullen, F. T., Skovron, S. E., Scott, J. E., & Burton, V. S., Jr. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 6-18.
20.
Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P., & Applegate, B. K. (1996). Control in the community: The limits of reform. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 69-116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Cumberland, J., & Zamble, E. (1992). General and specific measures of attitudes toward early release of criminal offenders. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 24, 442-455.
22.
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
23.
Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Farnworth, M., Bennett, K., & West, V. M. (1996). Mail vs. telephone surveys of criminal justice attitudes: A comparative analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 113-133.
25.
Flanagan, T. J., & Jamieson, K. M. (Eds.). (1988). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1987. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
26.
Flanagan, T. J., & Longmire, D. R. (Eds.). (1996). Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Garrett, C. J. (1985). Effects of residential treatment on adjudicated delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 287-308.
28.
Gavzer, B. (1995, August 13). Serving time in America. Parade Magazine, pp. 3-7.
29.
Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349-407.
30.
Gordon, D. R. (1991). The justice juggernaught: Fighting street crime, controlling citizens. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
31.
Gottfredson, S. D., & Taylor, R. B. (1984). Public policy and prison population: Measuring opinions about reform. Judicature, 68, 190-201.
32.
Gottfredson, S. D., Warner, B. D., & Taylor, R. B. (1988). Conflict and consensus about criminal justice in Maryland. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing: Surveys from five countries (pp. 16-55). Brookfield, VT: Gower.
33.
Halleck, S. L., & Witte, A. D. (1977). Is rehabilitation dead?Crime & Delinquency, 23, 372-382.
34.
Harris, L. (1968). Changing public attitudes toward crime and corrections. Federal Probation, 32(4), 9-16.
35.
Hindelang, M. J., Dunn, C. S., Aumick, A. L., & Sutton, L. P. (Eds.). (1975). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1974. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
36.
Hough, M., Lewis, H., & Walker, N. (1988). Factors associated with “punitiveness” in England and Wales. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing: Surveys from five countries (pp. 203-217). Brookfield, VT: Gower.
37.
Johnson, B. (1994). To rehabilitate or punish: Results of a public opinion poll. American Jails, 8, 41-43.
38.
Johnson, B., & Huff, C. R. (1987). Public opinion and criminal justice policy formulation. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2, 118-132.
39.
Johnson, W. W., Bennett, K., & Flanagan, T. J. (1997). Getting tough on prisoners: Results from the National Corrections Executive Survey, 1995. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 24-41.
40.
Kaminski, R. J., & Jefferis, E. (1997, March). The effect of a violent televised arrest on public perceptions of the police: A partial test of Easton's theoretical framework. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Louisville, KY.
41.
Knowles, J. J. (1987). Ohio citizen attitudes concerning crime and criminal justice. Columbus, OH: Governor's Office of Criminal Justice Services.
42.
Langworthy, R. H., & Whitehead, J. T. (1986). Liberalism and fear as explanations of punitiveness. Criminology, 24, 575-591.
43.
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Heges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage.
44.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1997). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
45.
Little, T. A. (1992). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of punishment programs for offenders: A preliminary assessment. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada.
46.
Maguire, K., & Flanagan, T. J. (Eds.). (1991). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1990. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
47.
Martinson, R. (1974, Spring). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, pp. 22-54.
48.
McCorkle, R. C. (1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes toward six common crimes. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 240-252.
49.
McGarrell, E. F., & Flanagan, T. J. (Eds.). (1985). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1984. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
50.
Moore, D. W. (1995, June). Americans firmly support death penalty. Gallup Poll Monthly, pp. 23-25.
51.
Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
Palmer, T. (1992). The re-emergence of correctional intervention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173-217.
54.
Pettinico, G. (1994). Crime and punishment: America changes its mind. Public Perspective, 5(6), 29-32.
55.
Reichel, P. L., & Gauthier, A. K. (1990). Boot camp corrections: A public reaction. In R. Muraskin (Ed.), Issues in justice: Exploring policy issues in the criminal justice system (pp. 73-96). Bristol, IN: Wyndham Hall.
56.
Riley, P. J., & Rose, V. M. (1980). Public vs. elite opinion on correctional reform: Implications for social policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 345-356.
57.
Roberts, J. V. (1992). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 16, pp. 99-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Roberts, J. V., & Edwards, D. (1989). Contextual effects in judgment of crimes, criminals, and the purposes of sentencing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 902-917.
59.
Roberts, J. V., & Gebotys, R. J. (1989). The purposes of sentencing: Public support for competing aims. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 387-402.
60.
Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (Eds.). (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
Sandys, M., & McGarrell, E. F. (1995). Attitudes toward capital punishment: Preference for the penalty or mere acceptance?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 191-213.
62.
Senese, J. D. (1992). Intensive supervision probation and public opinion: Perceptions of community correctional policy and practice. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 33-56.
63.
Serrill, M. S. (1975, May-June). Is rehabilitation dead?Corrections Magazine, pp. 3-12, 21-32.
64.
Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—1995, at URL: http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/.
65.
Steinhart, D. (1988). California opinion poll: Public attitudes on youth crime. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
66.
Sundt, J. L., Cullen, F. T., Applegate, B. K., & Turner, M. G. (1997, March). The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology revisited. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Louisville, KY.
67.
Thomson, D. R., & Ragona, A. J. (1987). Popular moderation versus governmental authoritarianism: An interactionist view of public sentiments toward criminal sanctions. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 337-357.
68.
Tuchfarber, A. J. (1988). Ohio: Presidential politics in “the heart of it all.”Election Politics, 5(1), 15-18.
69.
Turner, M. G., Sundt, J. L., Applegate, B. K., & Cullen, F. T. (1995). “Three strikes and you're out” legislation: A national assessment. Federal Probation, 59, 16-35.
70.
U. S. Bureau of the Census. (1994). County and city databook: 1994. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
71.
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1580-1607.
72.
Visher, C. A. (1987). Incapacitation and crime control: Does a lock'em up strategy reduce crime?Justice Quarterly, 4, 513-543.
73.
Warr, M., & Stafford, M. (1984). Public goals of punishment and support for the death penalty. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 95-111.
74.
White, M. F., & Menke, B. A. (1982). On assessing the mood of the public toward the police: Some conceptual issues. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10, 211-230.
75.
Wunder, A. (1995). The extinction of inmate privileges. Corrections Compendium, 20(6), 5-20.
76.
Zamble, E. (1990). Public support for criminal justice policies: Some specific findings. Forum on Corrections Research, 2(1), 14-19.
77.
Zamble, E., & Kalm, K. (1990). General and specific measures of public attitudes toward sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 22, 327-337.
78.
Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1995). Incapacitation: Penal confinement and the restraint of crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
