This article examines inmates' perceptions of sentencing intents (e.g., deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, and retribution). Two prison populations are sampled: 114 minimum security and 111 maximum security federal prisoners. Four months following admission, subjects were surveyed about their perceptions of their prison experience. The authors examine (a) inmates' identification with sentencing intents; (b) the interrelationships among these orientations; and (c) factors associated with the orientations. Results find inmates in both samples either adhered to several orientations, accepting notions of rehabilitation while also finding prison to be a deterrent, deserved, and a reparation, or they saw no purpose to the prison sanction. Multivariate analyses, for penitentiary inmates, found that inmates most likely to focus on rehabilitation were non-White, young, unemployed at the time of their arrest, and not entrenched in crime as a lifestyle. Older, White, inmates, and those employed at arrest, were more likely to observe that no purpose was served. Models were less conclusive for minimum security inmates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Correctional Association. (1994). ACA issues positions on crime bill. ACA On the Line, 17(2), 1.
2.
American Friends Service Committee. (1971). Struggle for justice. New York: Hill and Wang.
3.
Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.
5.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Nagin, D. (1978). Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
6.
Bonta, J., & Gendreau, P. (1990). Re-examining the cruel and unusual punishment of prison life. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 347-372.
7.
Bukstel, L., & Kilmann, P. (1980). Psychological effects of imprisonment on confined individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 88 (3): 469-493.
8.
Caspi, A., Moffit, T., Silva, P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Krueger, R., & Schmutte, P. (1994). Are some people crime prone? Replications of the personality-crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology, 32(2), 163-195.
9.
Corrections 2000. (1994). Federal crime bill in final stages. Corrections Alert, 1(1), 1-2.
10.
Crouch, B. (1993). Is incarceration really worse? Analysis of offenders' preferences for prison over probation. Justice Quarterly, 10(1), 67-88.
Cullen, F., Skovron, S., Scott, J., & Burton, V. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 6-18.
13.
Cullen, F., Wright, J., & Applegate, B. (1993, November). Control in the community. Paper presented at a conference of the International Association of Residential and Community Alternatives, Philadelphia, PA.
14.
Currie, E. (1985). Confronting crime: An American challenge. New York: Pantheon.
15.
Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy. New York: Julian.
16.
Eysenck, H. (1977). Crime and personality. London: Granada.
17.
Flanagan, T. (1983). Correlates of institutional misconduct among state prisoners. Criminology, 21, 29-39.
18.
Fogel, D. (1979). “We are the living proof:” The justice model for corrections (Vol. 2). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
19.
Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4(3), 349-407.
20.
Gibbs, J. (1975). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. New York: Elsevier.
21.
Hart, H.L.A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Hawkins, G. (1976). The prison: Policy and practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Hawkins, R., & Alpert, G. (1989). American prison systems: Punishment and justice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Irwin, J. (1970). The felon. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Jesness, C., & Wedge, R. (1983). Classifying offenders: The Jesness Inventory Classification System. Sacramento, CA: California Youth Authority.
26.
Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. (1989). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology, 27(4), 721-746.
27.
Mauer, M. (1990). Young, Black men and the criminal justice system: A growing national problem. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
28.
Mauer, M., & Hurling, T. (1995). Young, Black Americans and the criminal justice system: Five years later. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
29.
McClelland, K., & Alpert, G. (1985). Factor analysis applied to magnitude estimates of punishment seriousness: Patterns of individual differences. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1(3), 307-318.
30.
McCorkle, R. (1993). Research note: Punish or rehabilitate. Crime and Delinquency, 39(2), 240-252.
31.
Megargee, E., & Bohn, M. (1979). Classifying criminal offenders: A new system based on the MMPI. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
Menninger, K. (1966). The crime of punishment. New York: Vintage.
33.
Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavioral modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum.
34.
Mitford, J. (1973). Kind and unusual punishment: The prison business. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
35.
Morris, N. (1974). The future of imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Myers, L., & Levy, G. (1978). Description and prediction of the intractable inmate. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 15, 214-228.
37.
Newman, G. (1978). The punishment response. New York: Lippincott.
38.
Palmer, T. (1983). The “effectiveness” issue today: An overview. Federal Probation, 46, 3-10.
39.
Palmer, T. (1992). The re-emergence of correctional intervention: Developments through the 1980s and prospects for the future. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4(2), 173-217.
41.
Petersilia, J. (1990). When probation becomes more dreaded than prison. Federal Probation, 54(1), 23-27.
42.
Petersilia, J., &. Piper-Deschenes, E. (1994). What punishes? Inmates rank the severity of prison vs. intermediate sanctions. Federal Probation, 58(1), 3-8.
43.
Public Agenda Foundation. (1987). Crime and punishment: The public's view. New York: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
44.
Quay, H. (1965). Psychopathic personality: Pathological stimulation-seeking. American Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 180-183.
45.
Quay, H. (1983). Technical manual for the behavioral classifications system for adult offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
46.
Sherman, M., & Hawkins, G. (1982). Imprisonment in America: Choosing the future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Shipley, W. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 371-377.
48.
Thurston, L. (1993). A call to action: An analysis and overview of the United States criminal justice system, with recommendations. Chicago, IL: Third World Press.
49.
Toch, H. (1977). Living in prison. New York: Free Press.
50.
Toch, H., & Adams, K. (1989). Coping: Maladaptation in prisons. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
51.
Tonry, M. (1995). Malign neglect: Race, crime and punishment in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Van Voorhis, P. (1983). Theoretical perspectives on moral development and restitution. In W. Lauffer & J. Day (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development, and criminal behavior. Lexington: D.C. Heath.
53.
Van Voorhis, P. (1985). Restitution outcome and probationers' assessments of restitution: The effects of moral development. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(3), 259-287.
54.
Van Voorhis, P. (1994). Psychological classification of the adult, male, prison inmate. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
55.
Van Voorhis, P. (1995, November). Personality and the crime paradigm: Directions from the classification research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Boston, MA.
56.
von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice. New York: Hill and Wang.
57.
Warren, M. (1983). Applications of interpersonal maturity to offender populations. In W. Lauffer & J. Day (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development, and criminal behavior. Lexington: D.C. Heath.
58.
Wilson, J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Wilson, J., & Herrnstein, R. (1985). Crime and human nature. New York: Simon and Schuster.
60.
Wright, K. (1989). Race and economic marginality in explaining prison adjustment. Journal of Research in Crime and Justice, 26(1), 67-89.
61.
Zachary, R., Crumpton, E., & Spiegel, D. (1985). Estimating WAIS IQ from the Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(4), 532-540.
62.
Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1991). The scale of imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1995). Incapacitation: Penal confinement and the restraint of crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
