This article describes the system of youth justice adopted in New Zealand in 1989, which introduced a number of radical and innovative features including the involvement of young people, families, and victims in deciding how best to deal with the offending. The principle mechanism for achieving this is the family group conference, which replaces or supplements the Youth Court as the principle decision-making forum in most of the more serious cases. Research data are presented that indicate that, to a large extent, this new process is working well and may be having an impact on reconviction figures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Hardin, M. (1996). Family group conferences in child abuse and neglect cases: Learning from the experience of New Zealand. Washington, DC: ABA Center on Children and the Law.
2.
Hudson, J., Morris, A., Maxwell, G., & Galaway, B. (Eds.). (1996). Family group conferences: Perspectives on policy and practice. Annandale, New South Wales: Federation Press.
3.
Maxwell, G. M., & Morris, A. (1993). Families, victims and culture: Youth justice in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Social Welfare and Institute of Criminology.
4.
Maxwell, G. M., & Morris, A. (1996). Research on family group conferences with young offenders in New Zealand. In J. Hudson, A. Morris, G. Maxwell, & B. Galaway (Eds.), Family group conferences: Perspectives on policy and practice. Annandale, New South Wales: Federation Press.
5.
Morris, A., & Maxwell, G. M. (1996a). Family group conferences and offending. Criminology, Aotearoa/New Zealand, 3, 12-13.
6.
Morris, A., & Maxwell, G. M. (1996b). Recidivism revisited. Criminology, Aotearoa/New Zealand, 5, 11-12.
7.
Roeger, L. (1994). The effectiveness of criminal justice sanctions for aboriginal offenders. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 27, 264-281.
