This study examined the impact of legal, extralegal, and contextual variables on prison sentence lengths for violent felons sentenced in Georgia from 1981 to 1989. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted for all violent crimes and separately for four types of violent crime: murder and manslaughter, rape, aggravated assault, and robbery. Results indicated that the legally relevant factors—seriousness of the crime and number of convictions—had the strongest influence on sentence lengths. Across most violent crimes, male, older, and better-educated offenders received longer sentences than those without such characteristics. Political conservatism had a positive effect on sentence lengths for overall violent crime, robbery, and aggravated assault. Interaction effects for political conservatism and the number of convictions were significant, indicating that sentence length increased disproportionately as a court's conservatism and the felon's number of convictions increased. Findings suggest that political conservatism is an important contextual feature affecting prison sentence length.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, G. A. (1956). Comparative political systems. Journal of Politics, 18, 391-409.
2.
Almond, G., & Powell, G. B. (1978). Comparative politics (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
3.
Austin, T. L. (1981). The influence of court location on type of criminal sentence: The rural-urban factor. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9, 305-316.
4.
Austin, J., & Brown, M. (1989). Ranking the nation's most punitive and costly states. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
5.
Bailey, W. C. (1981). Inequality in the legal order: Some further analysis and commentary. Social Problems, 29, 51-60.
6.
Berry, W. D., & Feldman, S. (1985). Multiple regression in practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Biles, D. (1979). Crime and the use of prisons. Federal Probation, 9, 39-43.
8.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S., & Tonry, M. (Eds.). (1983). Research on sentencing: The search for reform. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
9.
Caldeira, G. A. (1991). Courts and public opinion. In J. B. Gates & C. A. Johnson (Eds.), The American courts: A critical assessment (pp. 303-334). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
10.
Carmines, R. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Carroll, L., & Doubet, M. B. (1983). U.S. social structure and imprisonment: A comment. Criminology, 21, 449-456.
12.
Chambliss, W. J. (1967, Summer). Types of deviance and the effectiveness of legal sanctions. Wisconsin Law Review, pp. 703-719.
13.
Cook, B. B. (1977). Public opinion and federal judicial policy. American Journal of Political Science, 21, 567-600.
14.
Eisenstein, J., Flemming, R. B., & Nardulli, P. F. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
15.
Eisenstein, J., & Jacob, H. (1977). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of criminal courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
16.
Frazier, C. E., Bishop, D. M., & Henretta, J. C. (1992). The social context of race differentials in juvenile justice dispositions. Sociological Quarterly, 33, 447-458.
17.
Gibson, J. L. (1978). Judges' role orientations, attitudes, and decisions: An interactive model. American Political Science Review, 72, 911-924.
18.
Goldkamp, J. (1980). The effects of detention status on judicial decisions: A closer look. Justice Systems Journal, 5, 234-257.
19.
Grossman, J. B., & Sarat, A. (1971). Political culture and judicial research. Washington University Law Quarterly, 2, 177-207.
20.
Hagan, J. (1977). Criminal justice in rural and urban communities: A study of the bureaucratization of justice. Social Forces, 55, 597-612.
21.
Inverarity, J., & McCarthy, D. (1988). Punishment and social structure revisited: Unemployment and imprisonment in the United States, 1948-1984. Sociological Quarterly, 29, 263-279.
22.
Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Joubert, P. E., Picou, J. S., & McIntosh, W. A. (1981). U.S. social structure, crime and punishment. Criminology, 19, 344-359.
24.
Kuklinski, J. H., & Stanga, J. E. (1979). Political participation and government responsiveness: The behavior of California superior courts. The American Political Science Review, 73, 1090-1099.
25.
Kritzer, H. M. (1979). Political cultures, trial courts, and criminal cases. In P. F. Nardulli (Ed.), The study of criminal courts: Political perspectives (pp. 131-169). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
26.
Levin, M. A. (1977). Urban politics and the criminal courts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
27.
McCarthy, B. R. (1990). A micro-level analysis of social structure and social control: Intrastate use of jail and prison confinement. Justice Quarterly, 7, 325-340.
28.
McGuire, W. J., & Sheehan, R. G. (1983). Relationship between crime rates and incarceration rates: Further analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 20, 73-85.
29.
Myers, M. A., & Talarico, S. M. (1986). The social context of racial discrimination in sentencing. Social Problems, 33, 236-251.
30.
Myers, M. A., & Talarico, S. M. (1987). The social context of criminal sentencing. New York: Springer-Verlag.
31.
Nardulli, P. F. (1978). The courtroom elite: An organizational perspective on criminal justice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
32.
Nardulli, P. F., Fleming, R. B., & Eisenstein, J. (1988). The tenor of justice: Criminal courts and the guilty plea process. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
33.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1989). Applied linear regression models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
34.
Parker, R. N., & Horowitz, A. V. (1986). Unemployment, crime and imprisonment: A panel approach. Criminology, 24, 751-773.
35.
Pepitone, A., & DiNubile, M. (1976). Contrast effects in judgments of crime severity and the punishment of criminal violators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 448-459.
36.
Pope, C. E. (1976). The influence of social and legal factors on sentencing dispositions: A preliminary analysis of offender based tracking statistics. Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 203-221.
37.
Pruet, G. W., & Glick, H. R. (1986). Social environment, public opinion, and judicial policy making: A search for judicial representation. American Politics Quarterly, 14, 5-33.
38.
Rutherford, A. (1977). Preliminary report to Congress: Vol. 1. Prison population and policy choices. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
39.
Selke, W. L., & Andersson, S. A. (1992). A model for ranking the punitiveness of states. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 8, 217-232.
40.
Spohn, C., & Cederblom, J. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 8, 305-326.
41.
Spohn, C., Gruhl, J., & Welch, S. (1981). The effect of race on sentencing: Re-examination of an unsettled question. Law and Society Review, 16, 71-88.
42.
Unnever, J., & Hembroff, L. A. (1988). The prediction of racial/ethnic sentencing disparities: An expectation states approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 53-82.
43.
Vines, K., & Jacob, H. (1971). State courts. In H. Jacob & K. N. Vines (Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.
44.
Walker, J. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880-899.
45.
Walsh, A. (1991). Race and discretionary sentencing: An analysis of “obvious” and “non-obvious” cases. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35, 7-19.
46.
Waltman, J. L., & Bowers, D. A. (1993). Do more conservative states impose harsher felony sentences? An exploratory analysis of 32 states. Criminal Justice Review, 18, 61-70.
47.
Wright, G. C., Erikson, R. S., & McIver, J. P. (1987). Public opinion and policy liberalism in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 980-1001.
