Section 20409 of the Violent Crime Control Act of 1994 contains several provisions that appear to be designed to diminish the role of federal courts in prison and jail overcrowding cases. This article examines the likely impact of these provisions and concludes that they are not likely to bring about a substantial change in the present role of federal courts in these cases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Civil Liberties Union, National Prison Project (1995). Status report: State prisons and the courts. Washington, D.C.: Author.
2.
Bator, P. (1981). Congressional power over the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Villanova Law Review, 27, 1030-1041.
3.
Benjamin v. Malcolm, 564 F. Supp. 668 (S.D.N.Y. 1983), 646 F. Supp. 1550 (S.D.N.Y. 1986), 659 F. Supp. 1006 (S.D.N.Y. 1987).
4.
Berkman, H. (1994, October). Philly invokes new rule on jail crowding. National Law Journal, p. A12.
5.
Call, J. (1983). Recent case law on overcrowded conditions of confinement. Federal Probation, 46, 23-32.
6.
Call, J. (1988). Lower court treatment of jail and prison overcrowding cases: A second look. Federal Probation, 52, 34-41.
7.
Call, J. (1995). Prison overcrowding cases in the aftermath of Wilson v. Seiter. The Prison Journal, 75, 390-405.
8.
Cole, R. and Call, J. (1992). When courts find jail and prison overcrowding unconstitutional. Federal Probation, 56, 29-39.
9.
Crime bill includes many corrections issues—Will too many strings be tied to new federal funding? (1994). Correctional Law Reporter, 49, 56-62.
10.
DiIulio, J. (1995). How to stop federal judges from releasing violent criminals and gutting truth-in-sentencing laws. Heritage Foundation Backgrounder. Washington, D.C.: Heritage Foundation.
11.
Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d 292 (7th Cir. 1983), 760 F.2d 756 (7th Cir. 1985).
12.
Feeley, M. (1983). Court reform on trial. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Hart, H., & Wechsler, H. (1992). The federal courts and the federal system. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
14.
Hellerstein, W., & Shapiro, B. (1972). Prison crisis litigation: Problems and suggestions. In M. Haft & M. Hermann (Eds.), Prisoners' Rights (pp. 201-235). New York: Practising Law Institute.
15.
Helling v. McKinney, 113 S.Ct. 2475, 53 Cr.L. 2229 (1993).
16.
Hirschkop, P., & Millemann, M. (1972). How to litigate a prisoners' rights case. In M. Haft & M. Hermann (Eds.), Prisoners' Rights (pp. 237-264). New York: Practising Law Institute.
17.
Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Kearney, 734 f. Supp. 561 (D.Mass. 1990).
18.
Jensen v. Gunter, 807 F. Supp. 1463 (D.Neb. 1992).
19.
Jost, T. (1986). From Swift to Stotts and beyond: Modification of injunctions in the federal courts. Texas Law Review, 64, 1101-1162.
20.
Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 672 F. Supp. 627 (D.Puerto Rico 1987).
21.
Nelson v. Collins, 700 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. 1983).
22.
Note. (1986). The modification of consent decrees in institutional reform litigation. Harvard Law Review, 99, 1020-1039.
23.
Occoquan v. Barry, 650 F. Supp. 619 (D.D.C. 1986), 844 F.2d 828(D.C.Cir. 1988)
24.
Pawa, M. (1993). When the Supreme Court restricts constitutional rights, can Congress save us? An examination of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 141, 1029-1101.
25.
Plyler v. Evatt, 846 F.2d 208 (4th Cir. 1988).
26.
Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 112 S.Ct. 748, 51 Cr.L. 2038 (1992).
27.
Ruiz v. Lynaugh, 811 F.2d 856 (5th Cir. 1987).
28.
Tabech v. Gunter, 869 F. Supp. 1446 (D.Neb. 1994).
