Offenders incarcerated in jails in Hillsborough County, Florida, had the opportunity to participate in an education program using computer-assisted instruction for basic literacy education and GED preparation. Although literacy levels were low with a tested mean of sixth grade prior to entering the program, participants made statistically significant gains in knowledge during 6 weeks of instruction. Overall, participants gained 2.40 grades during this period. Significance tests based on gender, race, and age were conducted with males, Blacks, and juveniles showing significantly higher gains in knowledge within these groups. However, when a logistic regression model was created using low/high gains as the dependent variable, only age remained significant indicating an interaction effect with gender and race. Participants in the program showed high levels of satisfaction with the program, and 90% had plans to continue their education upon release from incarceration. Based on the research conducted thus far, the program is operating successfully.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, D., Zinger, I., Hogue, R., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, S. (1990). Does correction treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
2.
Austin, M. (1987). Inmate education: A wise use of correctional funds. Corrections Today, 49, 42-45.
3.
Askov, E., & Turner, T. (1990). The role of instructional technology in correctional education. Journal of Correctional Education, 41, 82-85.
4.
Bell, R., Conard, E., & Suppa, R. (1984). The findings and recommendations of the national study on learning deficiencies in adult inmates. Journal of Correctional Education, 35, 129-136.
5.
Bozeman, W. (1987). Computer support for corrections education programs. Journal of Correctional Education, 38, 144-147.
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1990, June). Jail inmates 1989. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin No. NCJ-123264. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1991). Special report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
8.
Buser, C., Leone, P., & Bannon, M. (1987). Educating the handicapped. Corrections Today, 49, 17-18.
9.
Byrne, J. (1990). The future of intensive probation supervision and the new intermediate sanctions. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 6-41.
10.
Coffey, O. (1987). Book'em: No read, no release. Corrections Today, 49(3), 116-118.
11.
Cullen, F., Skovron, S., Scott, J., & Burton, V. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 6-18.
12.
DeGraw, D. (1987). A study of correctional educators in adult correctional institutions. Journal of Correctional Education, 38, 18-20.
13.
Farkas, G., & Hambrick, M. (1987). New partnership. Corrections Today, 49, 52-54.
14.
Foshay, W. (1990). Problems in implementing competency-based, mastery-model CBT. Journal of Correctional Education, 41, 68-70.
15.
Gehring, T. (1990). Journey without purpose: The technical revolution in correctional education. Journal of Correctional Education, 41, 50-56.
16.
Greenwood, P., & Zimring, F. (1985). One more chance: The pursuit of promising strategies for chronic and juvenile offenders. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
17.
Hassell, L. (1988). Keeping them from coming back to prison. Vocational Education Journal, 63(6), 28-30.
18.
Henerson, M., Morrison, L., & Fitzgibbons, C. (1988). How to measure attitudes (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Hudson, W. (1982). The clinical measurement package: A field manual. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
20.
Jostens Learning Corporation. (1993). The INVEST program introduction guide. San Diego: Author.
21.
Lewis, C., & Dunlop, C. (1991). Successful and unsuccessful adult education programs: Perceptions, explanations, and implications. Journal of Continuing Education, 49, 15-28.
22.
Long, H. (1983). Adult learning: Research and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Love, G. (1991). Consideration of the inmate student's locus of control for effective instructional leadership. Journal of Correctional Education, 42, 36-41.
24.
Project Literacy U.S. and Correctional Education Association. (1989). Learning behind bars: Selected educational programs from juvenile, jail and prison facilities. Pittsburgh, PA: WQED Pittsburgh for the National Outreach Center.
25.
Regnery, A. (1985). Getting away with murder. Policy Review, 34, 1-4.
26.
Romero, F. (1990). Aspects of adult development. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 45, 3-11.
27.
Schwartz, G., & Lewis, K. (1987). Effective prison education: Information exchange is critical. Corrections Today, 49, 26-29.
28.
Smith, L., & Bates, J. (1994). Annual report on the Hillsborough County Jail Literacy Project. First year's report to the U.S. Department of Education (Grant No. V255A30008).
29.
Sork, T. (1991). Tools for planning better programs. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 49, 89-95.
30.
Staff. (1990). Florida Rules of Court. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
31.
Stern, B. (1990). Baseline study of jail education programs. Sacramento: California State Library Foundation.
32.
Steurer, S. (1987). Correctional education: Testing new ideas. Corrections Today, 49, 6-18.
33.
Steurer, S., & Woodwell, M. (1989). Learning behind bars: Selected educational programs from juvenile, jail and prison populations. Laurel, MD: Correctional Education Association/QED Communications.
34.
Toch, H. (1982). The pains of imprisonment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Toch, H. (1987). Regenerating prisoners through education. Federal Probation, 51(3), 61-66.
36.
Tough, A. (1979). The adult's learning projects: A fresh approach to theory and practice in adult education. Austin, TX: Learning Concepts.
37.
Trites, R., & Fiedorowicz, C. (1991). An effective reading program for inmates. American Jails, 5(3), 73-78.
38.
Van den Haag, E. (1975). Punishing criminals: Concerning a very old and painful question. New York: Basic Books.
39.
Van Voorhis, P. (1987). Correctional effectiveness: The high cost of ignoring success. Federal Probation, 51, 56-62.
40.
Wexler, H., Faulkner, G., & Lipton, D. (1990). A modern prison rehabilitation program: An evaluation of the “stay 'n out” therapeutic community (final report to the National Institute on Drug Abuse). New York: Narcotic and Drug Research, Inc.
41.
Wilson, J. (1975). Thinking about crime. New York: Vintage.
